Tell the good news about home schools

Tell the good news about home schools

There are 298 comments on the Des Moines Register story from Jan 24, 2010, titled Tell the good news about home schools. In it, Des Moines Register reports that:

Does the Register not realize the $8 million the state spends for home schooling is a bargain to taxpayers? School districts receive 30 percent of the regular funding per child for home-schooled children, or 40 percent if dual-enrolled in order to cover costs associated with the home-schooled student participating in selected public school ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Des Moines Register.

MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#204 May 5, 2013
It wouldn't interest you, of course, Pedo Bob. It has nothing to do with naked young boys, and mentions you only incidentally. Your dismissal of it, therefore, is unsurprising.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#205 May 5, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Given he seriousness of your charges against Bob, the fact that you have thus far failed to have him arrested by the authorities in Ontario or the RCMP seems to indicate that you have no case. I haven't kept count of the number of comments on multiple threads on this forum in which you have made accusations against Bob that, if untrue, are libelous and slanderous but they must be in the hundreds. Furthermore, your gay bashing, reminiscent of Largelanguage, does not lend credibility to your accusations. May I respectively suggest that it is time to make it or get off the pot. Either file a complaint with the authorities in Canada, assuming that the abuse took place there, or STFU.
Once again, just to make it perfectly clear so that there be no misunderstanding, I have nothing against moderate religious followers, such as John Jones III, Ken Miller, Francis Collins, or even less moderate religious followers such as my thesis adviser. I do have a lot against criminals like RCC Cardinal Law, Cardinal Mahoney, Cardinal Egan, former Pope Benedict XVI, and the various high officials in other countries such as Ireland in that church that covered up the child abuse and protected the perpetrators of those crimes. Those miscreants belong in jail along with the actual abusers how have been tried and convicted. The fact is that, as we sit here today the RCC is a criminal conspiracy, no better then the Mafia, and should be treated as such.
As I said, my pissing contestcwith Pedo Bob doesn't concern you. You are woefully uninformed on the investigation, the exact nature of the charges, who is involved in the case, and the number and identity of other (alleged) victims to be telling me, the father of one of those victims, how it all seems to you..
Bob

Ch√Ęteauguay, Canada

#206 May 5, 2013
I'm copying from a post above because it seems worth repeating:
"Given he seriousness of your charges against Bob, the fact that you have thus far failed to have him arrested by the authorities in Ontario or the RCMP seems to indicate that you have no case. I haven't kept count of the number of comments on multiple threads on this forum in which you have made accusations against Bob that, if untrue, are libelous and slanderous but they must be in the hundreds. Furthermore, your gay bashing, reminiscent of Largelanguage, does not lend credibility to your accusations. May I respectively suggest that it is time to make it or get off the pot. Either file a complaint with the authorities in Canada, assuming that the abuse took place there, or STFU."

Yes, MaltaMon, either sh*t or get off the pot. Or STFU.

(Of course, SLC can now expect a vile, obnoxious stream of abuse for having DARED to point out what a liar MaltaMoron is.)

Hahahahahaha!
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#207 May 5, 2013
Bob wrote:
I'm copying from a post above because it seems worth repeating:
"Given he seriousness of your charges against Bob, the fact that you have thus far failed to have him arrested by the authorities in Ontario or the RCMP seems to indicate that you have no case. I haven't kept count of the number of comments on multiple threads on this forum in which you have made accusations against Bob that, if untrue, are libelous and slanderous but they must be in the hundreds. Furthermore, your gay bashing, reminiscent of Largelanguage, does not lend credibility to your accusations. May I respectively suggest that it is time to make it or get off the pot. Either file a complaint with the authorities in Canada, assuming that the abuse took place there, or STFU."
Yes, MaltaMon, either sh*t or get off the pot. Or STFU.
(Of course, SLC can now expect a vile, obnoxious stream of abuse for having DARED to point out what a liar MaltaMoron is.)
Hahahahahaha!
It's an opinion from an uninformed busy-body. If you agree with that kind of heft, it's find with me.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#208 May 5, 2013
** fine
Bob

Ch√Ęteauguay, Canada

#209 May 5, 2013
Sorry, but it's not an opinion, they are well-stated facts.
Unlike the blabbery that you post.
Moron.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#210 May 5, 2013
Bob wrote:
Sorry, but it's not an opinion, they are well-stated facts.
Unlike the blabbery that you post.
Moron.
Nah. He's not informed. But if his words bring you a measure od aid and comfort, that's fine with me.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#211 May 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Nah. He's not informed. But if his words bring you a measure od aid and comfort, that's fine with me.
By the way, apparently the authorities in California, particularly San Diego, not to mention the Google legal team, are as unimpressed with your accusations against Brad as, apparently, the RCMP is with your accusations against Bob.

Now just to make it perfectly clear so that there be no misunderstanding, I have no opinion relative to the dispute between you and Bob. As you say, I don't have all the facts; all I have is the pissing contest between the two of you. Pissing contests are not evidence in a court of law, either in the US or Canada. As they say, action talks and bullsh*t walks.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#212 May 6, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way, apparently the authorities in California, particularly San Diego, not to mention the Google legal team, are as unimpressed with your accusations against Brad as, apparently, the RCMP is with your accusations against Bob.
Now just to make it perfectly clear so that there be no misunderstanding, I have no opinion relative to the dispute between you and Bob. As you say, I don't have all the facts; all I have is the pissing contest between the two of you. Pissing contests are not evidence in a court of law, either in the US or Canada. As they say, action talks and bullsh*t walks.
My "accusations against Brad"? What are you talking about? And why say that the Mounties are "unimpressed"? How the hell would you know?
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#213 May 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> My "accusations against Brad"? What are you talking about? And why say that the Mounties are "unimpressed"? How the hell would you know?
Sgt. King of the Yukon has made those views quite well known ! sgd...your pal tinkerbell
SLC

Arlington, VA

#214 May 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> My "accusations against Brad"? What are you talking about? And why say that the Mounties are "unimpressed"? How the hell would you know?
I know because bob has not been arrested. If there is substance behind your accusations why haven't the authorities in Canada taken action as of yet?
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#215 May 6, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
I know because bob has not been arrested. If there is substance behind your accusations why haven't the authorities in Canada taken action as of yet?
You should know better than to say you"know" anything about this case. By your own admission, you are uninformed about it. You know nothing of the investigation, the other alleged victims, the lawyers involved, the prosecution's case. As an allegedly trained and experienced scientific researcher, which I'm beginning to doubt given your very amateurish non-scientific reasoning and standards for evidence, you would understand that any "knowledge" that you claim to possess is in fact pure speculation. Moreover, you claim to have proven a negative. And with no evidence whatsoever. Stay in the gutter, which is apparently where you feel most comfortable. And please--stay out of my affairs.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#216 May 6, 2013
I'm disappointed, Mr. SLC. I actually had believed your tale of having earned a Ph.D. In Physics. But no researcher with that level of achievement would ever claim to "know" anything about a situation without any information, much less, in a case such as this with multiple victims across hundreds of miles and more than a decade's worth of alleged criminal behavior, involving an ongoing investigation by several law-enforcement agencies in a foreign country which includes legal counsel for each alleged victim, the disposition of one of the investigating authorities. It's simply preposterous. No, yours is not the mind of a researching scholar. It is that of a self-important, nosy busy body who has made up his mind about a matter that does not involve him based upon the angry protestations of a guy who finds humor in the sexual abuse of children, and upon other hearsay. And who the hell is this "Brad"? You're talking out of an orifice other than your mouth, Sir.
SLC

Arlington, VA

#217 May 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
I'm disappointed, Mr. SLC. I actually had believed your tale of having earned a Ph.D. In Physics. But no researcher with that level of achievement would ever claim to "know" anything about a situation without any information, much less, in a case such as this with multiple victims across hundreds of miles and more than a decade's worth of alleged criminal behavior, involving an ongoing investigation by several law-enforcement agencies in a foreign country which includes legal counsel for each alleged victim, the disposition of one of the investigating authorities. It's simply preposterous. No, yours is not the mind of a researching scholar. It is that of a self-important, nosy busy body who has made up his mind about a matter that does not involve him based upon the angry protestations of a guy who finds humor in the sexual abuse of children, and upon other hearsay. And who the hell is this "Brad"? You're talking out of an orifice other than your mouth, Sir.
1. Brad is the gentleman running the web site that you have claimed is portraying child pornography.

2. I don't have the time to go back into the indefinite past but MaltaMon started a thread by posting a diatribe agains Bob on 10/1 of last year. That's seven months ago. Thus, I infer that the "investigation" of Bob has been going on for at least 7 months and he, apparently, has not yet been arrested, charged, or indited. That seems a long time for an investigation of whether or not Bob is a pedophile who has raped underage children, including, allegedly, MaltaMon's son. Has there been any coverage in the media of this so-called investigation? I'm getting the impression that this entire story is a figment of MaltaMon's imagination.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#218 May 6, 2013
You said you were speaking of what you KNOW. Now you say you "infer". An inference does not refer to knowledge, does it, Doctor? The terms are not at all synonymous. And if, as you protest, you have not had "the time" to look into the case (I would suggest that you also don't have the legal standing to obtain the pertinent information required to make any worthwhile inference--yours, as I said, is no better than pure speculation) why weigh in at all with the disposition of certainty you attempted to convey ("I know...")? What on earth would be your interest or motivation?
SLC

Arlington, VA

#220 May 6, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
You said you were speaking of what you KNOW. Now you say you "infer". An inference does not refer to knowledge, does it, Doctor? The terms are not at all synonymous. And if, as you protest, you have not had "the time" to look into the case (I would suggest that you also don't have the legal standing to obtain the pertinent information required to make any worthwhile inference--yours, as I said, is no better than pure speculation) why weigh in at all with the disposition of certainty you attempted to convey ("I know...")? What on earth would be your interest or motivation?
Given MaltaMon's 10/1/2012 post attacking Bob, I know that the "investigation", if any, has been going on for at least that time. That's 8 months. Since Bob hasn't been arrested as yet, IMHO, it is a fair inference that the "investigation" is a figment of MaltaMon's fevered imagination. Either that or the authorities in Canada has concluded that there is nothing to the allegations.

I asked MaltaMon if there were any newspaper stories concerning the "investigation". In all his rantings and smears on multiple threads on the Education Forum, comprising at least a hundred comments, MaltaMon has yet to provide a single citation showing that there was/is such an investigation. So far, we have only MaltaMon's word that there is/was such an investigation. Sorry MaltaMon, not good enough.
MaltataMon

New Castle, DE

#221 May 6, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Given MaltaMon's 10/1/2012 post attacking Bob, I know that the "investigation", if any, has been going on for at least that time. That's 8 months. Since Bob hasn't been arrested as yet, IMHO, it is a fair inference that the "investigation" is a figment of MaltaMon's fevered imagination. Either that or the authorities in Canada has concluded that there is nothing to the allegations.
I asked MaltaMon if there were any newspaper stories concerning the "investigation". In all his rantings and smears on multiple threads on the Education Forum, comprising at least a hundred comments, MaltaMon has yet to provide a single citation showing that there was/is such an investigation. So far, we have only MaltaMon's word that there is/was such an investigation. Sorry MaltaMon, not good enough.
You "know" nothing. And if you suspect the veracity of what I say, why use me,as your only source? I would never rely upon the words of one whom I don't believe. Why, thetefore, do you, an alleged research scientist? Answer: It's convenient. Was your scientific reasoning and use of evidence so suspect? And why this obsession with my son? Please tell me that you're not also a sexual pervert. I can infer no other apparent reason for your disturbingly intensive interest.
MaltataMon I

New Castle, DE

#222 May 6, 2013
SLC wrote:
<quoted text>
Given MaltaMon's 10/1/2012 post attacking Bob, I know that the "investigation", if any, has been going on for at least that time. That's 8 months. Since Bob hasn't been arrested as yet, IMHO, it is a fair inference that the "investigation" is a figment of MaltaMon's fevered imagination. Either that or the authorities in Canada has concluded that there is nothing to the allegations.
I asked MaltaMon if there were any newspaper stories concerning the "investigation". In all his rantings and smears on multiple threads on the Education Forum, comprising at least a hundred comments, MaltaMon has yet to provide a single citation showing that there was/is such an investigation. So far, we have only MaltaMon's word that there is/was such an investigation. Sorry MaltaMon, not good enough.
If there are any newspaper stories, I wouldn't direct anyone s attention to them on this forum. They would contain names, which I would not ever reveal here, of course. You know, Mr. SLC, I seriously doubt that you can possibly be the scholar that you claim to be. Your interests tend more toward the psych-sexual. And gossip. You requested serious discussion on a controversial topic. Then, after unloading a bellicose barrage of barroom invective on whoever might disagree with you, even though nobody had at that point, you quickly segued to Pedo Bob and his "pissing contest" with me. Very curious. What you are is (1) a religious bigot,(2) a nosy busy body, and (3) a fraud. And a nasty piece of work. Intelligent discussion was never your interest or objective. Now, I'm done, Mr. SLC.. You stay in the gutter. All the best to you.
MaltataMon I

New Castle, DE

#223 May 6, 2013
*psycho
MaltataMon I

New Castle, DE

#224 May 6, 2013
BTW. Don't bother to tell me that you aren't a pervert, even though I've asked. I wouldn't have any confidence in your ability to reply with candor. Second, frauds are a dime a dozen on anonymous chat lines. So in that regard, if not in the hallowed halls of academe, you have plenty of company.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
PE lessons (Feb '13) 13 hr Conservative Nudist 125
PE kit shirtless (Apr '14) 14 hr Conservative Nudist 167
Does Your School Still Have A Mandated Shower R... (Apr '14) 15 hr Conservative Nudist 177
Any Updates For 70-354 Exam Quetions - Universa... 15 hr LineDazzle 3
MAPOLY 1st Batch Admission list 2016/2017 Out. ... 15 hr Phil 10
All 'practice exams' threads a scam! 16 hr prostate exams 1
News Paddling teacher under fire (Aug '14) 20 hr Maltamon Academy 45
More from around the web