females supervising male nude swimmin...
Bob

Trois-rivières, Canada

#545 Aug 3, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> If I didn't have a son, you sick pederast, how in the world would admitting that you'd fucked him in the ass when he was twelve be taunting me? And how is that indelible online admission, along with a graphic description of that appalling criminal sexual assault of an innocent child, on any way funny?
It's taunting you, because I am admitting to something totally fictitious and outrageous. It's my way of saying: "this is what I think of both you and your concocted story, moron."

But hey, I wouldn't expect a moron to figure that one out!

So mange la marde!

Hahahahahaha!
Bob

Trois-rivières, Canada

#546 Aug 3, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
You are correct about one thing: you acknowledge in that latest post that you have, indeed, admitted online to raping a twelve year-old boy, and that the 12 y/o whom you've admitted to raping was my son. To say he doesn't exist, when you know that he does, won't absolve you when your lame-ass authorities in Canada finally find the aggits to charge and prosecute you. Admittedly, had you raped my son on New York, you'd never be prosecuted. My son's account would have come more than two years too late to meet the Statute of Limitations. That wouldn't mean, of course, that you didn't do it. The question I have is: Why do you think that admitting online that you DID rape my son will somehow prove that you DID NOT do it? Why say anything besides, "I never raped anybody"? Your words and actions are not those of an innocent man.
My words and actions are those of an innocent man who has been falsely accused by an obnoxious, ignorant moron, of a crime he did not commit.
I continually challenge you to 'show me the money','put your money where your mouth is', and 'where's the beef', but you never do. Even though I have proved, through logic, that all of your accusations are false and outrageous, you continue to maintain that you are telling the truth.
Baseline, if I had raped anybody's son, and the police knew about it, I would have been arrested long ago. I haven't, so that flushes your whole story down the toilet, along with your non-existent son.

Moron.
Bob

Trois-rivières, Canada

#547 Aug 3, 2013
"won't absolve you when your lame-ass authorities in Canada finally find the aggits to charge and prosecute you."
Stop trying to claim Canadian law is behind my not being arrested. You know that's not true.

I have posted plenty examples of pedophiles who were arrested for only ATTEMPTING to lure or seduce a child, so the Canadian police act quickly when a complaint is made.

The reason I have not been arrested is because I did not rape anybody.

( And the fact that it is impossible for you to have made a complaint to ANY police force that ANYBODY raped your son, because you do not have a son.)

So bite a fart, moron,
MaltaMon

Woodstown, NJ

#548 Aug 8, 2013
Bob wrote:
"won't absolve you when your lame-ass authorities in Canada finally find the aggits to charge and prosecute you."
Stop trying to claim Canadian law is behind my not being arrested. You know that's not true.
I have posted plenty examples of pedophiles who were arrested for only ATTEMPTING to lure or seduce a child, so the Canadian police act quickly when a complaint is made.
The reason I have not been arrested is because I did not rape anybody.
( And the fact that it is impossible for you to have made a complaint to ANY police force that ANYBODY raped your son, because you do not have a son.)
So bite a fart, moron,
You, of all people, know that my son is flesh and blood. Perhaps you still don't know that I am his father. But you met him when he was 12 in October 2004, lured him home after soccer practice, forced him to undress, fucckd him in the ass, then, by your own admission, tracked him down in 2012, after he went public with his charge against you, and stalked him on his university's campus. But all yoi're saying is that you don't know who I am--or, more accurately, whose father I am,which of your many child rape victims is my son. It's easy for you to dismiss me as having no relation whatsoever to any of the boys you've assaulted sexually.
djw

Bath, UK

#549 Aug 9, 2013
. As far as how sports physicals should only evaluate cardiovascular and motor systems, the NP did say something in the lines of, "These sports physicals are the only physicals many of these boys get." I guess that's part of the reason why she is particularly thorough.

Although I do agree that for sports physicals, genital area doesn't matter (except hernia), I have seen several school sports medical forms where they are biased towards males. For instance, I've seen several where one of the exam criteria said, "Genitalia and anus"
"

Yes, it may be the only physical boys get, but it is also the only physical that many of the girls get. There is still an irrational double standard at play. Why does everyone assume that a male hernia exam is so vital? There is little evidence for that either. Significant hernias are symptomatic and the boy will know if there's a problem. Or is the theory that you can't trust the kid to tell you if he has an inguinal bulge? American medicine likes routine check ups, such as the recent ACOG recommendation that adolescent girls get yearly pelvic exams. There's no evidence that annual pelvic exams in asymptomatic girls accomplish anything except embarrassing girls. Hopefully most parents ignore that recommendation.

My first question for the OP would be, are u present in the room during the actual exam? The reason I ask is perhaps the NP examines the young females, undrapes as necessary, then she covers again. Perhaps its a modesty issue? Usually when an adolescent comes in for an annual sports exam..it is his/her annual physical exam. Insurance wise, the physicians office cannot bill get reimbursed 2x for another physical. I'm sure the NP at least visualises the females genitalia for Tanner scale purposes. Ideally the NP should do a breast exam, and either her or an RN teach the girl how to do a self breast exam. One can do a scoliosis check by lifting a shirt up. Ideally a gown should be offered, but alot of offices would rather spare the expense. Just my .

Molly says"'I am a nurse for a np also she preforms physical on all types of ages and all males are completely nude . As a woman it brothered me at first I have to be in their. But now it ok I know I have a job to observe . But it has to be don,e.'

This response is disturbing on at least two levels. First, the way the procedure itself is done, only with males. Second, the fact that the you didn't let your intuition or conscience guide you. You felt something was wrong but you rationalized it. You convinced yourself that you've got a job to do, the job comes first, it has to be done, somebody's got to do it, if I don't do it someone else will...etc. What about the sensibilities of these young men? How about respecting their dignity? How do you think they feel not only being completely naked but having two women staring at them? How does that fit into your ethic. Anyway, that's how I read your comment. If I'm wrong, let me know. Explain to me why you think boys should treated this way and not girls.

first off there is no reason for the males to be nude during the exam. If a female patient was to be nude, would she not be provided a gown, my Dr. does an excellent exam and I go through the majority in my boxers, lowering them when needed. I went for an insurance exam and was provided disposable exam shorts. And as while Cul2 points out, while you say you have become comfortable with it, what about the patients. One has to know a second female only makes the discomfort greater for at least some of the patients. An observer is for the benefit of the NP not the patient so the least they could do was take what ever steps they could to minimize the impact on the patient. I am not blaming you for doing what you are told to as part of your job, we all do things we don't want to so we can put food on the table. While I do not blame you, I do blame the NP, and it still doesn't make it right.
djw

Bath, UK

#550 Aug 9, 2013
. As far as how sports physicals should only evaluate cardiovascular and motor systems, the NP did say something in the lines of, "These sports physicals are the only physicals many of these boys get." I guess that's part of the reason why she is particularly thorough.

Although I do agree that for sports physicals, genital area doesn't matter (except hernia), I have seen several school sports medical forms where they are biased towards males. For instance, I've seen several where one of the exam criteria said, "Genitalia and anus"

Yes, it may be the only physical boys get, but it is also the only physical that many of the girls get. There is still an irrational double standard at play. Why does everyone assume that a male hernia exam is so vital? There is little evidence for that either. Significant hernias are symptomatic and the boy will know if there's a problem. Or is the theory that you can't trust the kid to tell you if he has an inguinal bulge? American medicine likes routine check ups, such as the recent ACOG recommendation that adolescent girls get yearly pelvic exams. There's no evidence that annual pelvic exams in asymptomatic girls accomplish anything except embarrassing girls. Hopefully most parents ignore that recommendation.

Molly says'I am a nurse for a np also she preforms physical on all types of ages and all males are completely nude . As a woman it brothered me at first I have to be in their. But now it ok I know I have a job to observe . But it has to be don,e.'

This response is disturbing on at least two levels. First, the way the procedure itself is done, only with males. Second, the fact that the you didn't let your intuition or conscience guide you. You felt something was wrong but you rationalized it. You convinced yourself that you've got a job to do, the job comes first, it has to be done, somebody's got to do it, if I don't do it someone else will...etc. What about the sensibilities of these young men? How about respecting their dignity? How do you think they feel not only being completely naked but having two women staring at them? How does that fit into your ethic. Anyway, that's how I read your comment. If I'm wrong, let me know. Explain to me why you think boys should treated this way and not girls.

first off there is no reason for the males to be nude during the exam. If a female patient was to be nude, would she not be provided a gown, my Dr. does an excellent exam and I go through the majority in my boxers, lowering them when needed. I went for an insurance exam and was provided disposable exam shorts. And as while Cul2 points out, while you say you have become comfortable with it, what about the patients. One has to know a second female only makes the discomfort greater for at least some of the patients. An observer is for the benefit of the NP not the patient so the least they could do was take what ever steps they could to minimize the impact on the patient. I am not blaming you for doing what you are told to as part of your job, we all do things we don't want to so we can put food on the table. While I do not blame you, I do blame the NP, and it still doesn't make it right. I hope you will at least discuss this and advocate for your patients, male or female.

End this Penisylvanian Mysandry now. No more CFNM!
Bob in Toronto

Toronto, Canada

#552 Aug 11, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> You, of all people, know that my son is flesh and blood. Perhaps you still don't know that I am his father. But you met him when he was 12 in October 2004, lured him home after soccer practice, forced him to undress, fucckd him in the ass, then, by your own admission, tracked him down in 2012, after he went public with his charge against you, and stalked him on his university's campus. But all yoi're saying is that you don't know who I am--or, more accurately, whose father I am,which of your many child rape victims is my son. It's easy for you to dismiss me as having no relation whatsoever to any of the boys you've assaulted sexually.
IF I had raped your son in 2004, and IF I had stalked him in 2012, and IF there were other victims, and IF the police are tracking me, and IF a complaint had been made, I would have been arrested long ago. But I haven't, because I haven't raped ANYBODY, you DON'T have a son for anyone to rape, and NO ONE has made a complaint, and NO grand jury has indicted me, and NO police agency is tracking me.

Nuff said.

You have been making the same TIRED OLD CLAIMS for 18 months now, and they have come to naught.

So get stuffed.

Hahahahahahaha!
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#553 Aug 11, 2013
Bob in Toronto wrote:
<quoted text>
IF I had raped your son in 2004, and IF I had stalked him in 2012, and IF there were other victims, and IF the police are tracking me, and IF a complaint had been made, I would have been arrested long ago. But I haven't, because I haven't raped ANYBODY, you DON'T have a son for anyone to rape, and NO ONE has made a complaint, and NO grand jury has indicted me, and NO police agency is tracking me.
Nuff said.
You have been making the same TIRED OLD CLAIMS for 18 months now, and they have come to naught.
So get stuffed.
Hahahahahahaha!
But you have admitted ALL of it. Unfortunately, the police want more evidence of a crime that occurred nine years ago. Your admissions will help, but apparently, although they come from your computer, that isn't proof that YOU wrote and posted them. I'm fed up. In this state, if not everywhere in this country, you'd be gone. Charged, tried and convicted on the evidence already available. But not in Canada. Now, what's with the "in Toronto"? Have they sent you back? Or was it time to leave Quebec--maybe the risk of arrest led you to flee jurisdiction?
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#554 Aug 11, 2013
As for LineDazzle, you will have noticed that he's not visited these threads at all in weeks, PedoBIT. If he's not reading the stuff, how can he post in favor of it? Besides, who posts in support of you other than your two Faggy Lackeys? Nobody, Pedo Dear. Not a single boy or man.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#555 Aug 11, 2013
Now, I've noticed that to inaugurate your new life of a fugitive from justice, your life of exile in Ontario, you have chosen to honor me, to make this my special evening of tribute from Pedo Bob, by posting about me on all the "Bob/Nude Boys" threads, but after just three, I'll forego reading all your other touching remarks. I hasten to add, however, that I'm simply thrilled to be the topic of literally ALL your posts tonight. Obviously, you've got me under your skin. And that can't be fun for you to have allowed me to get there. Enjoy "Tarana", Pedo Baby. But, please, keep your hands off the young boys you'd like to take back to your dark little room, force to disrobe completely, and fukk in the ass..
Bob in Dorval

Trois-rivières, Canada

#556 Aug 12, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
As for LineDazzle, you will have noticed that he's not visited these threads at all in weeks, PedoBIT. If he's not reading the stuff, how can he post in favor of it? Besides, who posts in support of you other than your two Faggy Lackeys? Nobody, Pedo Dear. Not a single boy or man.
I suspect that LineDazzle has been arrested for re-posting child-pornography by the UK authorites, as you will soon be, MaltaMon, for the same reason.
How ironic would it be if it turned out to be true that the "local and federal are closing in", but it was MaltaMon that they were closing in on?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#557 Aug 13, 2013
Maltomon must have been investigated by the Philadelphia authorities ever since he posted that the law should allow people to take nude photos of children.
Also making false claims and accusations about a raped son is a crime which carries a prison sentence.
Sooner or later he will be arrested when the PA authorities find out his identity.
MaltaMon

Lansdale, PA

#558 Aug 13, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Maltomon must have been investigated by the Philadelphia authorities ever since he posted that the law should allow people to take nude photos of children.
Also making false claims and accusations about a raped son is a crime which carries a prison sentence.
Sooner or later he will be arrested when the PA authorities find out his identity.
That's not what I said. I said that a couple who photographed their daughters wrapped in bath towels should not have been charged with creating and trafficking in child pornography. Of course, you know that's what I said, but that doesn't stop you from lying about it, would you have done at least a dozen times. And, indeed, if intentionally misquoting me is the the most formidable retort that you can muster to all of the direct verbatim quotes I have posted of your own statements, you are only proving that you have nothing that's true that you can use against me. Whereas, Zwacko, my many citations of your many sick pedophila-themed postings are incontrovertible
LineDazzle

Chester, UK

#559 Aug 14, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> That's not what I said. I said that a couple who photographed their daughters wrapped in bath towels should not have been charged with creating and trafficking in child pornography. Of course, you know that's what I said, but that doesn't stop you from lying about it, would you have done at least a dozen times. And, indeed, if intentionally misquoting me is the the most formidable retort that you can muster to all of the direct verbatim quotes I have posted of your own statements, you are only proving that you have nothing that's true that you can use against me. Whereas, Zwacko, my many citations of your many sick pedophila-themed postings are incontrovertible
I'm back again.
Djw

Cannock, UK

#560 Aug 14, 2013
Why dont you consummate your online relationshit with Molly, Line?
The Police

Montréal, Canada

#561 Aug 15, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> But you have admitted ALL of it. Unfortunately, the police want more evidence of a crime that occurred nine years ago. Your admissions will help, but apparently, although they come from your computer, that isn't proof that YOU wrote and posted them. I'm fed up. In this state, if not everywhere in this country, you'd be gone. Charged, tried and convicted on the evidence already available. But not in Canada. Now, what's with the "in Toronto"? Have they sent you back? Or was it time to leave Quebec--maybe the risk of arrest led you to flee jurisdiction?
"The police want more evidence"

No, we don't want MORE evidence, we want ANY evidence. So far MaltaMon has provided no evidence, and readers have refuted every one of his silly claims.

If MaltaMon or his alleged son have any evidence, they should provide it, along with a complaint to ANY local, state, or federal police agency, and steps will be taken. Until that time, we have no intention of investigating, monitoring, tracking, watching, or arresting Mr. Bob.
MaltaMon

Wilmington, DE

#562 Aug 15, 2013
The Police wrote:
<quoted text>
"The police want more evidence"
No, we don't want MORE evidence, we want ANY evidence. So far MaltaMon has provided no evidence, and readers have refuted every one of his silly claims.
If MaltaMon or his alleged son have any evidence, they should provide it, along with a complaint to ANY local, state, or federal police agency, and steps will be taken. Until that time, we have no intention of investigating, monitoring, tracking, watching, or arresting Mr. Bob.
Oh, poor, dumb Pedo Bob, why bother if you are innocent as you keep insisting? Because you're not.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#563 Aug 16, 2013
LineDazzle wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm back again.
Good boy! Molly thought you were lost.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#564 Aug 16, 2013
likely phil got tired of taking limefizzle for walks so turned him back over to molly---NOW she may get a vote !!
MaltaMon

Emmaus, PA

#565 Aug 16, 2013
coyote wrote:
likely phil got tired of taking limefizzle for walks so turned him back over to molly---NOW she may get a vote !!
"She". You old Fa**ggot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
All TestDumps fake! 15 hr Elena 2
News Jaguar shot 21 hr Panther Had Its Life 4
Summer a bummer 21 hr Pastel Has Its Li... 5
News Consider Homeschooling with ADD (Jan '13) Sat Paddling has its ... 10
News Florida teens still behind national average on ... (Aug '08) Sat Paddling has its ... 20
Spankings and forced nude swim classes should b... Sat Paddling has its ... 5
News In the fight against sexual assault, this schoo... Sat Paddling has its ... 4
More from around the web