females supervising male nude swimmin...
MaltaMon

Kunkletown, PA

#371 Apr 2, 2013
(OH, AND BACK WHEN coyote AND Zuiko WEREN'T SUCH GREAT FRIENDS, FROM THE SAME THREAD, P. 1):

Judged:
2
1
1
coyote wrote:
Erica'-- male or female-- you only refer to boys! That is an escalation to females being primarily a sexual object------- DUMB ! Sir Arthur- grow up !!
Could you explain yourself instead of being offensive? Why do you think of it in sexual terms instead of practical terms? That only means you have a dirty mind.

Sir Arthur:
You are constantly boasting on these forums that you go to nudist and clothing optional beaches so that you can display yourself naked and see other men and women naked. So aren't you being a bit hypocritical and contradictory?
MaltaMon

Kunkletown, PA

#372 Apr 2, 2013
Ironic, isn't it, coming from a "man" who used to remove his clothing while on stage at a gay leather bar, dance for the old beleathered men, then do lap dances and sit bare-bottomed on the faces of the biggest tippers at their tables or in the men's room stall.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#373 Apr 2, 2013
Wow- just watched the game 1 of Women's World Hockey tournament 'tween Cda. & USA--guess that means, in maltaculta cult, coyote is perverted. Fine with coyote.. To end off the evening I figured that since I was so evil to watch said game I should punish myself to see if you had retorted to any posts from the coyote- not disappointed in that you responded but disappointed with the depth you stoop to try and justify your BS. You scrounge around to repro posts made in an arena of joking and twist the context to satisfy your cowardly character. Lookit friend- I for one do not think your son is as you present and that being my opinion I frankly find your cowardly manner in self serving your "pity me" attitude rather revolting in the 15 sec. I may spend giving any consideration whatsoever to your crude, rude mannerism. lol... Stick around tho good buddy for you allow some of we less gifted to realize there is someone even further hampered-Ace...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#374 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
Ironic, isn't it, coming from a "man" who used to remove his clothing while on stage at a gay leather bar, dance for the old beleathered men, then do lap dances and sit bare-bottomed on the faces of the biggest tippers at their tables or in the men's room stall.
Trying to put your depravities on me, and on others, makes you look more ridiculous, and reveals more about you.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#375 Apr 2, 2013
Dear double-face Maltamon pervert, here is another example of you defending Large in his Fathers bathing daughters thread.

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T1B30UU8...
Phil

UK

#376 Apr 3, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
Dear double-face Maltamon pervert, here is another example of you defending Large in his Fathers bathing daughters thread.
http://www.topix.com/forum/education/T1B30UU8...
Where on that thread does Maltamon 'defend' Large?
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#377 Apr 3, 2013
Zuiko wrote:
<quoted text>
Trying to put your depravities on me, and on others, makes you look more ridiculous, and reveals more about you.
Those are your own depraved postings, your own depraved thoughts, your own depraved words. Phil's criticism of you is what inspired me to look into your recent past. Found these comments in two minutes. Proof of your nude-boy obsession. They go hand-in-hand with the child pornography you posted. Do you deny having said ANY of it? God, you're a lying jackass sleazebag and a damned fool.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#378 Apr 3, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Where on that thread does Maltamon 'defend' Large?
Phil, you at once defined this man and identified his fundamental character flaw with great precision when you called him "a liar".

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#379 Apr 3, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Where on that thread does Maltamon 'defend' Large?
In post #15 where he fails to condemn Large for starting a thread about fathers bathing teenage daughters. He defends Large by turning his attacks against me to deflect and encouraging Large. If you can't see this you are dumber than I thought.
Largelanguage

Ruthin, UK

#380 Apr 3, 2013
RJP wrote:
<quoted text> I'm 48.
OK, don't feel invaded or anything, but just to clarify, why are you posting on this site? For what purpose?
Largelanguage

Ruthin, UK

#381 Apr 3, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Where on that thread does Maltamon 'defend' Large?
Even the paedophilic Phil is starting to find Zuiko unreasonable.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#382 Apr 3, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Even the paedophilic Phil is starting to find Zuiko unreasonable.
I should think most pedos would find Zuiko unreasonable as he does not support their sick lifestyles--but you may be incorrect to try and group Phil in with your cult---let Phil decide little Large... thts fair eh !!Really no one else's concern methinks !
Largelanguage

Ruthin, UK

#383 Apr 3, 2013
coyote wrote:
<quoted text> I should think most pedos would find Zuiko unreasonable as he does not support their sick lifestyles--but you may be incorrect to try and group Phil in with your cult---let Phil decide little Large... thts fair eh !!Really no one else's concern methinks !
Zuiko advocated sexual abuse of male children, and he also posted images of nude boys.
We all have a right to be concerned when it comes to such a sick person, who has no rights in himself. You are unrealistic.
Phil

UK

#384 Apr 3, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Even the paedophilic Phil is starting to find Zuiko unreasonable.
For you to refer to anybody as a pedo is a bit rich.
Look in the mirror, sunshine.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#385 Apr 3, 2013
PROJECTION ! Forget Z and assist Molly scrounging old Sears Roebuck etc catalogs to get the "real" culprits in court !! Move it Kip !

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#387 Apr 3, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Zuiko advocated sexual abuse of male children, and he also posted images of nude boys.
We all have a right to be concerned when it comes to such a sick person, who has no rights in himself. You are unrealistic.
Sorry boy, but I never advocated any sexual abuse, as you have, and I never posted any images. You are really confused.
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#388 Apr 3, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe but such activity is not bound by or restricted to borders where investigations are concerned.
One countries police force will pass on their findings to that of the perpetrators.
My hunch, as I said, is that they won't find any criminal or otherwise suspicious activity in his online postings or history. Large won't be of any interest to the authorities even in his own country. And what you suggest about sharing is much less common than you think. First, they have to decide to investigate someone in another country, and if they find anything, share it with that nation's authorities. To do that takes up time, manpower, technology and allotted funding. They can't simply follow foreigners Online from every other country; they have to leave each to identify its own. And they don't send lists of accounts to check on because of a nasty-ass posting. I would love for the autgorities here to monitor Bob, especially since my son is a US citizen (as well as Canadian) and his domicile is Pennsylvania. But the sexual assault upon him took place in Canada, and his accused predator is Canadian, lives in Canada, and has no activity traced to these parts. They're sympathetic, but their hands are tied. They'll do nothing unless he begins to post from here. Taxpayers don't want sexual predators on the loose, but theydon't want to bear the cost of identifying them beyond our borders. It's slightly different among states in this country, but still the limitations on how far one state will devote resources toward identifying predators in another are very limited, if discretionary in some cases. I know this from volunteering with a private org that helps to track down online predators.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#389 Apr 3, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> My hunch, as I said, is that they won't find any criminal or otherwise suspicious activity in his online postings or history. Large won't be of any interest to the authorities even in his own country. And what you suggest about sharing is much less common than you think. First, they have to decide to investigate someone in another country, and if they find anything, share it with that nation's authorities. To do that takes up time, manpower, technology and allotted funding. They can't simply follow foreigners Online from every other country; they have to leave each to identify its own. And they don't send lists of accounts to check on because of a nasty-ass posting. I would love for the autgorities here to monitor Bob, especially since my son is a US citizen (as well as Canadian) and his domicile is Pennsylvania. But the sexual assault upon him took place in Canada, and his accused predator is Canadian, lives in Canada, and has no activity traced to these parts. They're sympathetic, but their hands are tied. They'll do nothing unless he begins to post from here. Taxpayers don't want sexual predators on the loose, but theydon't want to bear the cost of identifying them beyond our borders. It's slightly different among states in this country, but still the limitations on how far one state will devote resources toward identifying predators in another are very limited, if discretionary in some cases. I know this from volunteering with a private org that helps to track down online predators.
So you do not consider your friend Large, who has promoted the sexual abuse of underage girls, as a sexual predator?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#390 Apr 4, 2013
Do you STILL refuse to acknowledge what I have said about that and which you have read? And has Large posted child pornography, as you have? Has he called for requiring "all boys to their teens" to swim completely nude in every situation--school swim classes, recreation, private lessons--even, and especially, when females are present, as you have? Did he create a thread openly demanding that all underaged boys to be forced to swim completely nude all the time, as you did? Did he state unequivocally that graphic depictions of the brutal rape of young boys are "funny", as you have? Does he support without hesitation a man accused of raping another man's son, as you do? Kind of takes the punch out of your phony-baloney self-righteous challenge to me, doesn't it?
MaltaMon

Blackwood, NJ

#391 Apr 4, 2013
Finally, ZuikiFaerie, did Large download photos of completely naked young boys and post them on Topix, as YOU DID!!??? The answer to ALL of these questions is, unequivocally, "no". Yet YOU, Zuikomam, are guilty of ALL of that and more.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Punishment (Nov '14) 6 min Singapore Sling Phil 58
Barefoot PE (Mar '14) 10 min Bishop MichaelN 125
PE lessons (Feb '13) 13 min Bishop MichaelN 58
News Bishop Morin 'graduating' with St. Stanislaus' ... 16 min Bishop MichaelN 1
News Prince Harry nude photos: A reminder we're all ... (Aug '12) 18 min Major MoN 22
testschamp full of viruses, don't touch them! 21 min Line Dazzle 2
nudity in co-ed contexts (May '14) 22 min Line Dazzle 54
More from around the web