females supervising male nude swimmin...
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#351 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
RJP, May I ask how old you are?
Its a bit strange. What is RJ(?) perhaps doing on this thread? Perhaps he is just new and is only wanting to contribute to whatever conversion he thinks is going on(No offense to him).

Although I could be wrong, and he might just happen to be yet another sexual predator.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#352 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Much better than I might have worded it, and absolutely on target. His arrogance, which is impossible to justify, impels him toward the delusion that he is the most intelligent guy in the room. And the most clever. Pedo Bob and ZuikiSomething suffer from the same mistaken self-perception. It is at least somewhat entertaining to watch, and even funny on occasion, although coyote isn't terribly funny when he tries to be. It is clear, however, that he regards himself as very witty. Phil, who seems to be suffering from pangs of candor lately, perhaps should be the one to tell Tinkerbell that he's actually a witless bore and should forget about any plans he has to spend his retirement as a stand-up comedian or a published humorist.
Phil doesn't seem to be that much of an idiot, and he does seem to have at least a brain cell to function on.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#353 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Much better than I might have worded it, and absolutely on target. His arrogance, which is impossible to justify, impels him toward the delusion that he is the most intelligent guy in the room. And the most clever. Pedo Bob and ZuikiSomething suffer from the same mistaken self-perception. It is at least somewhat entertaining to watch, and even funny on occasion, although coyote isn't terribly funny when he tries to be. It is clear, however, that he regards himself as very witty. Phil, who seems to be suffering from pangs of candor lately, perhaps should be the one to tell Tinkerbell that he's actually a witless bore and should forget about any plans he has to spend his retirement as a stand-up comedian or a published humorist.
Thank you by the way.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#354 Apr 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Phil doesn't seem to be that much of an idiot, and he does seem to have at least a brain cell to function on.
You are too kind.
I am overcome with emulsion.
Largelanguage

Wem, UK

#355 Apr 2, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
You are too kind.
I am overcome with emulsion.
Perhaps I am being too kind, to you that is. Perhaps you are more dumb than I suspected.
RJP

Lockport, NY

#356 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
RJP, May I ask how old you are?
I'm 48.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#357 Apr 2, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps I am being too kind, to you that is. Perhaps you are more dumb than I suspected.
From one who admits on a public forum that Maltamon would have us believe is being monitored by the the police to wanting to spank (sorry, honour) nude 13 year old girls I would be careful who you call dumb.
Pot. Kettle. Black?
Who knows who might now be monitoring your internet traffic, ie, what websites you go to, what you post!
D-J-W

Scunthorpe, UK

#358 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> Much better than I might have worded it, and absolutely on target. His arrogance, which is impossible to justify, impels him toward the delusion that he is the most intelligent guy in the room. And the most clever. Pedo Bob and ZuikiSomething suffer from the same mistaken self-perception. It is at least somewhat entertaining to watch, and even funny on occasion, although coyote isn't terribly funny when he tries to be. It is clear, however, that he regards himself as very witty. Phil, who seems to be suffering from pangs of candor lately, perhaps should be the one to tell Tinkerbell that he's actually a witless bore and should forget about any plans he has to spend his retirement as a stand-up comedian or a published humorist.
Maltamon has no answer to the travesty of females supervising male nude swimming programs in 50's, 60's 70's. He is a self hating mysandrist promoting CFNM forced nudity. Only I stand for justice I will take Pennsylvania back. The minutemen have failed!
MaltaMon

Lansdale, PA

#359 Apr 2, 2013
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
From one who admits on a public forum that Maltamon would have us believe is being monitored by the the police to wanting to spank (sorry, honour) nude 13 year old girls I would be careful who you call dumb.
Pot. Kettle. Black?
Who knows who might now be monitoring your internet traffic, ie, what websites you go to, what you post!
In fact, they are. But if they find no criminal activity in his history, so what? To say,what he said is , not criminal. Meanwhile, the monitors are Canadian.Should the find anything, they don't have jurisdiction. Are you suggesting that they will find child pornography or evidence that he has sexually abused a minor? My hunch--my certainty--is that with respect to Large, they will find neither.
D-J-W

Scunthorpe, UK

#360 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> In fact, they are. But if they find no criminal activity in his history, so what? To say,what he said is , not criminal. Meanwhile, the monitors are Canadian.Should the find anything, they don't have jurisdiction. Are you suggesting that they will find child pornography or evidence that he has sexually abused a minor? My hunch--my certainty--is that with respect to Large, they will find neither.
Back to the plantation y'all. Red Injuns to the reservation. Mexi-guns to the border camps, Maltamom is honour bound to defend forced nudity.

Goodnight America where-ever you are?
MaltaMon

Lansdale, PA

#361 Apr 2, 2013
D-J-W wrote:
<quoted text>
Back to the plantation y'all. Red Injuns to the reservation. Mexi-guns to the border camps, Maltamom is honour bound to defend forced nudity.
Goodnight America where-ever you are?
The criminally hypocritical DJW who, having posted a child porn site here that contains literally hundreds of photos of young boys entirely nude, and dozens of even younger boys forcibly stripped to underwear briefs and forced to pose erotically, dares to speak out, with all the sincerity of the child-abusing, child-porn-distributing, boy-loving sociopath he is.
MaltaMon

Lansdale, PA

#362 Apr 2, 2013
He must be barred from access to Topix.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#363 Apr 2, 2013
D-J-W wrote:
<quoted text>
Maltamon has no answer to the travesty of females supervising male nude swimming programs in 50's, 60's 70's. He is a self hating mysandrist promoting CFNM forced nudity. Only I stand for justice I will take Pennsylvania back. The minutemen have failed!
"....no answer to the travesty of females supervising male nude swimming programs in 50's, 60's 70's"

Apparently Maltamon, all this was your fault.
What have you to say for yourself?
Shame on you.
Phil

Dunfermline, UK

#364 Apr 2, 2013
MaltaMon wrote:
<quoted text> In fact, they are. But if they find no criminal activity in his history, so what? To say,what he said is , not criminal. Meanwhile, the monitors are Canadian.Should the find anything, they don't have jurisdiction. Are you suggesting that they will find child pornography or evidence that he has sexually abused a minor? My hunch--my certainty--is that with respect to Large, they will find neither.
Maybe but such activity is not bound by or restricted to borders where investigations are concerned.
One countries police force will pass on their findings to that of the perpetrators.
coyote

Halifax, Canada

#365 Apr 2, 2013
I ck'ed with K-car who called the`school. The response is all their resources are involved with locating execs. of Sears, Eaton's, K-Mart etc plus ad agencies for the millions of photos published in the said cos. yearly catalogs over dozens of years depicting exactly what MM describes. Heck-it is a "biggie" as lo and behold there are ads with young girls, adult men & women as well as boys. Damn- underwear, bathing suits, shorts, halters- "major" sting being conducted all over North America. Yes indeedy- that 'ol Molly has reallum "nailed it"! Understand , in her household they did not look at the pictures, they only used the pages in their outhouse--- here we mere mortals have been jesting with Molly the magnificent !!!!
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#366 Apr 2, 2013
coyote wrote:
I ck'ed with K-car who called the`school. The response is all their resources are involved with locating execs. of Sears, Eaton's, K-Mart etc plus ad agencies for the millions of photos published in the said cos. yearly catalogs over dozens of years depicting exactly what MM describes. Heck-it is a "biggie" as lo and behold there are ads with young girls, adult men & women as well as boys. Damn- underwear, bathing suits, shorts, halters- "major" sting being conducted all over North America. Yes indeedy- that 'ol Molly has reallum "nailed it"! Understand , in her household they did not look at the pictures, they only used the pages in their outhouse--- here we mere mortals have been jesting with Molly the magnificent !!!!
Gee, I don't know why the police in Montreal and the RCMP wouldn't come right out and tell you whom they are investigating and for what reasons. After all, ongoing investigations to track the online activities of certain individuals are what those in law enforcement prefer to reveal indiscriminately to the public and to discuss openly, without restraint, and in detail. Damnit, coyote, your brilliance has foiled me again. If you feel empowered by having exposed my lie and my son's, well, you deserve it. Now, the reality is this: My son, as an alleged victim, has been in touch with these good public servants since he learned on Topix exactly a year ago--oddly in a post by Pedo Bob directed to your attention--that,Bob had moved from Toronto to Montreal. He has reported Bob's posted admission of his rape of my son, which you and he claimed was a joke, as well as several threads which Bob created in recent months, the titles of which refer to my son. Those are the threads that they are monitoring. There is no way that any of that would be confirmed by either agency upon request. Unleds and until thete is an indictment. Moreover, the privacy laws at the federal and the provincial level would render even less likely any candid reply to your inquiry.
MaltaMon

New Castle, DE

#367 Apr 2, 2013
But that diminishes neither your brilliance nor your omniscience, Tinkerbell. Indeed, it does not disprove anything that you have learned from cable television movies and other made-for-TV docudramas about actual procedure and protocol of online-predator investigations. Reality has nothing on your body of knowledge. I'm sure that you regard ARGO as one hundred percent accurate.
MaltaMon

Kunkletown, PA

#368 Apr 2, 2013
THE FOLLOWING IS THE INAUGURAL POST ON A THREAD ENTITLED, "WE SHOULD MANDATE THAT BOYS SWIM NAKED ALWAYS". AND THAT WAS "Sir Arthur"--better known to us these days as "Zuiko"

HERE IT IS IN ITS ENTIRETY:

Dec 1, 2010
Judged:
8
6
5
You are right, boys should be made to swim nude everywhere. Swimming trunks look ridiculous and out of place on boys up to teen age.
That's how it was done in the old days, and this custom should be brought back for boys.
MaltaMon

Kunkletown, PA

#369 Apr 2, 2013
And here is the link to that thread if you want to read all of Zuiko/Sir Arthur's posts about boys swimming nude:

http://www.topix.com/forum/education/TVJPLQJQ...
MaltaMon

Kunkletown, PA

#370 Apr 2, 2013
(ONE OF MY FAVORITES OF ZUIKO/SIR ARTHUR'S FROM THE SAME THREAD, P. 1:

Dec 2, 2010
Judged:
4
1
Aaron Weaver wrote:
Even though you are being sarcastic, boys and men should be aloud to swim in the nude, provided that there isn't anyone around of the same gender (devision of opposite genders) and they have the right not to swim naked. Oh....and allowing nude swimming has nothing to do with homosexuality. Homosexuality should not be taught in public schools as being normal and saving sex for marriage (between a man and a woman) should be encouraged in our school education.

Sir Arthur:
http://gasguys.wordpress.com
Isn't that a bit conservative? And why should the genders be separated for swimming, if there are responsible adults to oversee them?
Admittedly girls should keep a bit of modesty while boys should be totally nude. It also makes boys behave better and not be so rowdy at pools if they are nude.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Education Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News College student says she was verbally assaulted... 16 min Geezer 2
Certified System Architect PEGACSA71V1 practice... 19 min latestexams 1
News 13-year-old earns full ride offer after perfect... 27 min Wet Nebraska Cloud 1
77-882 Excel 2010 28 min latestexams 1
News Sex sting 29 min Pennstate Has Its... 1
Microsoft MCSE 70-342 latest dumps 1 hr latest exams 1
News Trump plagued with the sniffles during debate 3 hr Geezer 17
More from around the web