House Republicans pass "No More Solyn...

House Republicans pass "No More Solyndras" bill

There are 109 comments on the Reuters story from Sep 14, 2012, titled House Republicans pass "No More Solyndras" bill. In it, Reuters reports that:

The Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed a bill on Friday that would phase out a program for energy loans after a lengthy investigation into why a now-bankrupt California solar panel maker got a $535 million government loan.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

xnutmegger

Phoenix, AZ

#64 Sep 14, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't care WHAT they are for, the oil companies make BILLIONS upon BILLIONS in profit. They can certainly pay for their own R&D.
NO TAXPAYER SUBSIDIES FOR OIL COMPANIES!!!!
LEFTY CRONY CAPITALIST at work.

Do not disturb.

So do the drug companies but Obama played CRONY CAPITALISM with them( as did Bush) so you aren't ALLOWED to bad mouth them.

Typical LEFTY.
serfs up

Melbourne, FL

#65 Sep 14, 2012
twostroketerror wrote:
Another waste of time and money by the "fiscal conservatives" let's see if they vote on it 32 more times like health care and waste another $30 million doing ~ nothing~...
Moody's predicts an other downgrade at the hands of the obstructionist GOP. Hooray.
After controlling Washington for six years with two of them total, come January if you are fortunate, you will have one side of congress. Then of course we will see how great you work with the other side and the new president. We know there will be no obstruction at all.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#66 Sep 14, 2012
JohnInLa wrote:
<quoted text>Attention youtheturd!!! Quit your mealy mouth whining about oil, twit. If you are so down on oil I suggest you immediately remove from your surroundings any and all products and services that are oil related. Only thing remaining would be you sitting butt naked on a pile of dirt and your neighbors would be laughing their behinds off...Put a sock in it, bozo.
Nope, I think instead I'll just keep pointing out the oil barons don't deserve taxpayer welfare.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#67 Sep 14, 2012
xnutmegger wrote:
<quoted text>
LEFTY CRONY CAPITALIST at work.
Do not disturb.
So do the drug companies but Obama played CRONY CAPITALISM with them( as did Bush) so you aren't ALLOWED to bad mouth them.
Typical LEFTY.
So you support taxpayer funded welfare for the oil barons. Good to know.

Btw, I oppose welfare for the drug companies as well.
Bob Lewis

AOL

#68 Sep 14, 2012
Yeah OK wrote:
How about pass a NO MORE OBAMA bill? That f****d up sack of doo dogoo has got to go!!!
We still have another option.

50% of America want to be Obamites and live like cubans or north koreans begging Big Brother for Food.

50% of American still want to be Americans and live by American standards and values.

Let's split up and live happily ever after. All this Hate can stop overnight.
Let's Divide and be Happy. Let's stop arguing and fighting. It's unhealthy and undignified.
xnutmegger

Phoenix, AZ

#69 Sep 14, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
So you support taxpayer funded welfare for the oil barons. Good to know.
Btw, I oppose welfare for the drug companies as well.
Welfare , nice try LEFTY.

But as a LEFTY I understand that you believe that gov't has a right to tax at 100% So anything less is welfare .

So as a LEFTY if I pump 50,000B aday I should be allowed to write-off R & D but not if I pump 500,000 B aday ?

Without R & D our whole industrial base would colaspe in 3 years and we would bow to China.

Don't you KNOW that R & D is what drives Apple , Microsoft and Boeing to be industry leaders ?

Neo-Marxist at work.

“I'd rather be snowmobiling”

Since: Oct 07

8120'

#70 Sep 14, 2012
serfs up wrote:
<quoted text> After controlling Washington for six years with two of them total, come January if you are fortunate, you will have one side of congress. Then of course we will see how great you work with the other side and the new president. We know there will be no obstruction at all.
"We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go. We want the Ryan budget. We just need a president to sign this stuff. We don’t need someone to think it up or design it. Pick a Republican with enough working digits to handle a pen to become President of the United States.”
~Grover Norquist, calling for conservatives to elect a weak President they can use as a puppet, CPAC, February 2012. NOTE: While Norquist did not specifically mention Romney, other Republicans on this list have noted Romney’s weak leadership skills and his lack of spine in standing for what he believes in.
Copyright 2012

Rochester, MN

#71 Sep 14, 2012
House Republicans pass "No More Solyndras" bill

its about time, this Obama admin has poorly spent our tax dollars, goes to show that progressives seek to bankrupt the USA
see the light

United States

#72 Sep 14, 2012
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
How about no more wall street bailouts while they're at it! No taxpayer funds for unearned executive bonuses too!
No bonuses should be given out, earned or not. You Liberals think Monopoly money is real.
see the light

United States

#74 Sep 14, 2012
Any way you can stop that guy from spending and wasting money we don't have is good.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#76 Sep 14, 2012
xnutmegger wrote:
<quoted text>
Welfare , nice try LEFTY.
But as a LEFTY I understand that you believe that gov't has a right to tax at 100% So anything less is welfare .
So as a LEFTY if I pump 50,000B aday I should be allowed to write-off R & D but not if I pump 500,000 B aday ?
Without R & D our whole industrial base would colaspe in 3 years and we would bow to China.
Don't you KNOW that R & D is what drives Apple , Microsoft and Boeing to be industry leaders ?
Neo-Marxist at work.
I have no problem supporting emerging technologies like tech startups & renewable energy etc; especially when they are competing against defacto monopolies.

Apple? Microsoft? Boeing?

CUT THEM OFF!!

No more welfare for multi-billion dollar corporations. They're doing just fine.

“Hillary, thirty years of lying”

Since: Nov 08

Paris

#77 Sep 14, 2012
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
How about no more wall street bailouts while they're at it! No taxpayer funds for unearned executive bonuses too!
you mean like the early christmas present Obamas fed buddy just gave by pumping money we didn't have.......

US credit rating downgraded -- again...OBAMA COULD CARE LESS…..RE-ELECTION IS ALL HE CARES ABOUT…….THE PLANE, VACATIONS, AND THE BIG SECTION 8 WHITE HOUSE.

PUMPING BLAMED...

CASH FOR BANKERS: Fed risks political fallout...

Faber: If I Were Bernanke, I Would Resign...
xnutmegger

Phoenix, AZ

#78 Sep 14, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problem supporting emerging technologies like tech startups & renewable energy etc; especially when they are competing against defacto monopolies.
Apple? Microsoft? Boeing?
CUT THEM OFF!!
No more welfare for multi-billion dollar corporations. They're doing just fine.
That's CRONY CAPITALISM.

What is the cut-off point for what industry ?

Lobbyists will get rich lobbying for " Their " clients.

So destroy one billion dollar corp and by default 2 new show up( overseas).

We destroy Boeing and Airbus ( Euro. corp) takes over as an monopoly and we loose 30 -40,000 jobs overseas and big trade $$$$.

All or none , not the pols picking winners and losers.

You should think through your ideas.
Copyright 2012

Rochester, MN

#79 Sep 14, 2012
The stock market is being artificially juiced by the Fed, Printing money that isn't worth the paper its printed upon.
Sue Robbins

AOL

#80 Sep 14, 2012
xnutmegger wrote:
<quoted text>
That's CRONY CAPITALISM.
What is the cut-off point for what industry ?
Lobbyists will get rich lobbying for " Their " clients.
So destroy one billion dollar corp and by default 2 new show up( overseas).
We destroy Boeing and Airbus ( Euro. corp) takes over as an monopoly and we loose 30 -40,000 jobs overseas and big trade $$$$.
All or none , not the pols picking winners and losers.
You should think through your ideas.
As long as Americans are smart enough not to elect any more Union funding operatives who pretend to be Democrats at election time.....we will be just fine. Too many people on here are too negative.
Chi Town Hustler

London, UK

#81 Sep 14, 2012
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
RIGHT: Romney started shooting his mouth off before the bodies were cold and it turns out he didn't know what he was talking about.
Big surprise.
Clinton condemned the attacks: she is the secretary of state and was their boss. It is her job to address it.
Draft dodger Romney was hoping to find a few more votes.
Even fellow Republicans condemn his statements.
Hillary just condemned your statements and your existence.

“Truth to Power!”

Since: Apr 07

United States

#82 Sep 14, 2012
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:
How about no more wall street bailouts while they're at it! No taxpayer funds for unearned executive bonuses too!





The Democrats Already BLOCKED that remember?




(D) Chris Dodd said Obama told him to put the AIG Bonuses in their Bill! Oooops!




Bwahahahahahahahahahaaaaa!



“Proud To Be An American”

Since: Apr 07

Location hidden

#83 Sep 14, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, I think instead I'll just keep pointing out the oil barons don't deserve taxpayer welfare.
Attention youtheturd!!! You should drill your own well and refuse what you call taxpayer welfare. Of course if your well does not produce just drill another one...but whatever you do just keep pointing out the oil barons don't deserve taxpayer welfare.
Copyright 2012

Rochester, MN

#84 Sep 14, 2012
2013 Obama's welfare state year

Support the better canidate Romney 2012

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#85 Sep 14, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill Clinton isn't a tea bagger, dumbass. Tore ups his draft card and pissed off to Engalnd.
Romney marched in pro war and pro draft rallies- carrying signs- but when it was his time to serve, he ran away to France.

PS: Clinton isn't running for President.

Draft Dodger Romney is.

He isn't doing a very good job of it, but he is running for President.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Bankruptcy Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Tuesday is Twa's Day Tue LibertyF-ck 1
News Rick Siskey estate auction brings in more than ... Jul 23 Wise Owl 1
News Stephan Condodemetraky, president of Dusty Old ... Jul 22 Rpmx 4
News Newnan lawyer suspended for 6 months (Nov '14) Jul 19 op greylord 34
News U.S. Marshals arrest man in Madison for attempt... Jul 18 ORAZIO Corrupt 8
News Stone's Cove Kitbar closes in Bel Air Jul 12 EGG 1
News Charlottesville businessman who admitted to ste... May '17 bert 1
More from around the web