Diabetes shouldn't affect Sotomayor's ability to serve on Supre...

[HellCatMaggie]

Tory II wrote:

If a diabetic doesn't stop you from owning a gun, then Sotomayor will.
Thumbs down. Shes' unfit for any courtroom.

This is possibly one of the STUPIDEST remarks I've ever seen on Topix. Explain to me how she will take our guns away? LOL (this ought to be good) Stop being so hysterical! The only thing you know about this woman is what you've gathered from the RWL's. I doubt very much if you have researched her decisions, much less understand them. You just sound silly.

[Tory II]

Obama and Sotomayor are going to teach you and millions of white liberals all about Black political power.

[HellCatMaggie]

Tory II wrote:

Obama and Sotomayor are going to teach you and millions of white liberals all about Black political power.

I was wrong...THIS is the most stupid remark on Topix. Explain yourself.

[HellCatMaggie]

Tory II wrote:

Obama and Sotomayor are going to teach you and millions of white liberals all about Black political power.

You keep posting stupid remarks with nothing to back them up. That means you don't know what you are talking about. You're doing nothing but regurgitating RWL junk with no understanding what you're talking about. Explain to me how Sotomayer will take our guns away. Explain how Obama and Sotomayor are going to teach white liberals about Black power?(Like we didn't see that during the 50's and 60's.) Come on...give me the benefit of your vast knowledge! lol

[Tory II]

For example:

"In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."

http://gunowners.org/a052909.htm

[giftagab]

HellCatMaggie wrote:

<quoted text>
I think you need a reminder about Type 1 diabetes.
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease. It has nothing to do with food choices. It is a disease of the endocrine system.
It is, in many cases, inherited....
Inheritance
Type 1 Diabetes is a polygenic disease, meaning many different genes contribute to its expression. Depending on locus or combination of loci, it can be dominant, recessive, or somewhere in between. The strongest gene, IDDM1, is located in the MHC Class II region on chromosome 6, at staining region 6p21. This is believed to be responsible for the histocompatibility disorder characteristic of type 1: Insulin-producing pancreas cells (beta cells) display improper antigens to T Cells. This eventually leads to the production of antibodies that attack these beta cells. Weaker genes are also located on chromosomes 11 and 18.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diabetes_mellitu ...

Geez! Calm down. Have drink or medication or something. I recognize some boozers on that list, particularly Johnny Cash.

I want to see a 100 percent healthy and conservative supreme court judge on that bench making judgments.

That leaves your out, that's for sure1

[HellCatMaggie]

Tory II wrote:

For example:
"In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."
http://gunowners.org/a052909.htm

ROFLMAO....Gunowners.com? You couldn't find a more bias source, could you? First, there is no author to this article. What experience does this anonymous person have to interpret these cases? Second, this article uses Fox News as a reference. Fox is well known to be the GOP mouthpiece. Not exactly un-bias, are they? Third, what a scam! While the NRA and the gun manufacturers are promoting gun ownership, they are forgetting to tell you there will be no ammo. LOL Keep spending big bucks for guns, idiots! The gun manufactures are raking it in!
The case you sited? Have a look....
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Jose SANCHEZ-VILLAR, Defendant-Appellant.
Background: Defendant was convicted in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York of distribution and
possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and possession of a
firearm by an illegal alien, and he appealed.
Holding: The Court of Appeals held that police officers' discovery of
gun in defendant's possession while they were located in place from
which they plainly could see the gun gave officers probable cause to
believe that a crime of possession of a firearm was being committed
under New York law, creating probable cause for both the seizure of
the weapon and the arrest of defendant. Affirmed.
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/us.vs.sanchez...
YOU ARE TRYING TO DEFEND A COCAINE DEALING, GUN TOTING ILLEGAL ALIEN. Also, Sotomayor DID NOT reach this ruling by herself. READ!
Defendant-appellant Jose Sanchez-Villar was convicted, following a
jury trial, in the Southern District of New York (Schwartz, J.) of one
count of distribution and possession with intent to distribute
approximately 1.2 kilograms of cocaine base (â??crackâ??
cocaine), in violation of 21 U.S.C.§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(A),
and of one count of possession of a firearm by an illegal alien
Specifically, he claims that his counsel was ineffective for
failing to challenge the warrantless seizure of the firearm and the
police officers' subsequent warrentless arrest of him. Sanchez-Villar
asserts that the seizure and arrest were improper because, he claims,
the officers had no basis to believe his possession of the firearm was
illicit. Rather, the only grounds for probable cause arose,
Sanchez-Villar contends, after his arrest-when he admitted that he was
an illegal alien."
THIS IS A LIST OF U.S. ATTORNEYS THAT WORKED ON THE CASE...AND A LIST OF JUDGES WHO RULED, OF WHICH SOTOMAYOR WAS ONE.
Jonathan S. Kolodner, Assistant United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York (David N. Kelley, United States Attorney
for the Southern District of New York, on the brief; Daniel A. Braun,
Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New
York), New York, New York, for Appellee, of counsel.
Present: SACK, SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, and KAPLAN, District Judge.FN*
FN* The Honorable Lewis A. Kaplan, of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by
designation.

[HellCatMaggie]

giftagab wrote:

<quoted text>
Geez! Calm down. Have drink or medication or something. I recognize some boozers on that list, particularly Johnny Cash.
I want to see a 100 percent healthy and conservative supreme court judge on that bench making judgments.
That leaves your out, that's for sure1

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized

February 5, 2009

U. S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surgery for an apparently early-stage pancreatic cancer today, at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. According to Dr. Murray Brennan, the attending surgeon, Justice Ginsburg will likely remain in the hospital approximately 7-10 days.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/02/05/supr...

Justice Rehnquist in Hospital with Thyroid Cancer
October 25, 2004

U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 80, remains hospitalized after spending the weekend receiving treatment for thyroid cancer.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...

Chief Justice Rehnquist Vows Not to Retire

Despite his age and his ailments, Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist declared for public record Thursday that he will continue to head the highest court in the land.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,10835...

You're an idiot.

[giftagab]

HellCatMaggie wrote:

<quoted text>
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Hospitalized
February 5, 2009
U. S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had surgery for an apparently early-stage pancreatic cancer today, at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City. According to Dr. Murray Brennan, the attending surgeon, Justice Ginsburg will likely remain in the hospital approximately 7-10 days.
http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/02/05/supr...
Justice Rehnquist in Hospital with Thyroid Cancer
October 25, 2004
U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 80, remains hospitalized after spending the weekend receiving treatment for thyroid cancer.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php...
Chief Justice Rehnquist Vows Not to Retire
Despite his age and his ailments, Supreme Court Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist declared for public record Thursday that he will continue to head the highest court in the land.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,10835...
You're an idiot.

I am a LOT smarter than you. Insults from fools like you don't harm me.

That's because I will still be smarter than you tomorrow and better looking.

And NOT diabetic. heh

[HellCatMaggie]

giftagab wrote:

<quoted text>
I am a LOT smarter than you. Insults from fools like you don't harm me.
That's because I will still be smarter than you tomorrow and better looking.
And NOT diabetic. heh

ROFLMAO..... just how old are you? Pretty silly! Well, I guess this conversation is over.......you know nothing.

[Tory II]

"In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right." [Larry Pratt, GunOwners of America]

http://gunowners.org/a052909.htm

If you believe you have a right to your life then if follows you have a right to protect your life, then it follows you have a right to protect your life with a weapon.

The 2nd amendment prohibits govt from regulating weapons.

Sosomayor is a nutjob who shows contempt for the Bill of Rights.

[giftagab]

Tory II wrote:

"In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right." [Larry Pratt, GunOwners of America]
http://gunowners.org/a052909.htm
If you believe you have a right to your life then if follows you have a right to protect your life, then it follows you have a right to protect your life with a weapon.
The 2nd amendment prohibits govt from regulating weapons.
Sosomayor is a nutjob who shows contempt for the Bill of Rights.

Well-stated. Good research.

[Billy]

giftagab wrote:

<quoted text>
Well-stated. Good research.

Actually, anybody who did their research would know that the court was quoting settled law. http://www.politechbot.com/docs/us.vs.sanchez...

Do you have a problem with courts citing settled law?

The problem with any of Tory II's assertions is that he makes them in a vacuum and out of context. It's a disservice to his own research and to anyone following him. His assertion is meaningless outside of the context of judicial precedence. Please: do your own research on the subject.

[Tory II]

Why was the 14th amendment added to the Constitution ?

Any person of color would know.

[giftagab]

Billy wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, anybody who did their research would know that the court was quoting settled law. http://www.politechbot.com/docs/us.vs.sanchez...
Do you have a problem with courts citing settled law?
The problem with any of Tory II's assertions is that he makes them in a vacuum and out of context. It's a disservice to his own research and to anyone following him. His assertion is meaningless outside of the context of judicial precedence. Please: do your own research on the subject.

Frankly Billy, I don't give a damn. Topix is slumming diversion for me. I have tons of real work for very good money.

[giftagab]

Tory II wrote:

Why was the 14th amendment added to the Constitution ?
Any person of color would know.

You jivin' me whitey?

[Billy]

Tory II wrote:

Why was the 14th amendment added to the Constitution ?
Any person of color would know.

Taking the Fourteenth Amendment out of context won't help you. After all, context is key. Good thing most judges and justices know that.

There have been volumes written about the 14th Amendment. I'm not going to reiterate it all here.

[Billy]

giftagab wrote:

<quoted text>
Frankly Billy, I don't give a damn. Topix is slumming diversion for me. I have tons of real work for very good money.

Then get to it, I guess, and stop wasting my "slumming diversion." Somebody might actually think you're correct about something!

[Tory II]

Sosomayor (and Omama) believes Americans don't have a right to own a gun.

The real irony of this,(this Nazi judge) is that she's a Puerto Rican (a minority.) She should understand even better than me (a white man) the intent and purpose of the 14th amendment, because the 14th, the 13th and one or two others were completely unneccessary (in a so-called free country).

The 14th amendment applies the Bill of Rights to the States.

Any decent person who wants to be free and wants all other people to be free would know that we don't need amendments that have to spell out that slavery (for example) is immoral and illegal.

Any decent person (especially a Justice) should know that Dred Scott being born in America has a profound moral and legal claim to his freedom (he should not even have to be in any court trying to obtain his freedom in a free country).

If you don't understand this, it's because you either have a low IQ or you believe some people have more natural rights than others (Nazios.)

Sosomayor is just like Adolf Hitler, a Nazi.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal (including Dred Scott), that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness (and if they have a right "to Life" then they have a right to protect their Life, and if they have a right to protect their Life, then it follows that they have a right to possess a weapon to do that)." (Thomas Jefferson, The Declaration of Independence).

This Puerto Rican bitch (racist constitution hater) must think that because I'm a white man, I have no claim to my freedom. Eh ? Because that's how earlier white Justices thought about Dred Scott the Black man. Eh ?

The 14th amendment was added because White men didn't want Black men to have any 2nd amendment rights. So after the SCOTUS ruled the 2nd didn't apply to the States, the Feds added the 14th (to make the 2nd apply to the States).

Sosomayor doesn't know American history.

[giftagab]

Topix current photo of Sotomayor tells it all. Her stress and muddled thinking show on her face.

Don't need no roadmap to see into this chick.