US school shooting revives gun debate

Dec 14, 2012 Full story: Yahoo! 2,340

Relatives of those killed in past mass shootings reacted with outrage to Friday's news of another massacre at an elementary school in Connecticut.

Full Story

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1803 Jan 28, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
“the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Have to LOVE these gun gnutters who cannot seem to remember the ENTIRE second amendment.

As we all know: a partial truth is a lie.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1804 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
You are easy.
You are free and from the spooge stains on your shirt: frequent.

Wipe your chin, donglicker, you are a frightful mess.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1805 Jan 28, 2013
Cathouse Mouse wrote:
Is this a clip or magazine?
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/desertf...
... and why does it matter?


You can call a submarine an airplane, but it won't fly,Orville.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1806 Jan 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are free and from the spooge stains on your shirt: frequent.
Wipe your chin, donglicker, you are a frightful mess.


You look rather pale. Are you sure you aren't dead and just too stupid to lie down?
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1807 Jan 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Have to LOVE these gun gnutters who cannot seem to remember the ENTIRE second amendment.
As we all know: a partial truth is a lie.


SCOTUS remembered it and you lose, flamer.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1808 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
They are magazines in AR 15s and AK 47s, not clips
Funny how the gun gnutters use the terms 'magazines' and 'clips' interchangeably ALL THE TIME yet get pithy when they think can score points on someone else.

Websters defines a clip as:(quote): a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles; also : a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm.

Don't be pedantic unless you like to have things crammed up your azz.

Well... I guess you are going to be pedantic, eh, donglicker?

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1811 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
Three ten round magazines equal one thirty round magazine and if you are familiar with the weapon you could probably reload in two seconds.
Ask a cop if he or she would rather face a gun gnutter who had an AR-15 with three ten round clips or one 30 round magazine.

Or a drum that had 100 rounds in it.

donglickers is so stupid.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1812 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS remembered it and you lose, flamer.
Funny how I am able to post the entire thing, spoogebreath, and how SCOTUS keeps reminding gun gnutters that there are more than 11 words there.

Wipe your chin, you are a mess!

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1813 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
You look rather pale. Are you sure you aren't dead and just too stupid to lie down?
Isn't about time you changed your bib, dear?

Since: Aug 10

Cathouse Mouse

#1814 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can call a submarine an airplane, but it won't fly,Orville.
So ..... you don't know?

You could have just said that and not got all emotional about it.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1815 Jan 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask a cop if he or she would rather face a gun gnutter who had an AR-15 with three ten round clips or one 30 round magazine.
Or a drum that had 100 rounds in it.
donglickers is so stupid.


They aren't clips, they are magazines. A clip is something you use to hold your knee pads to your Bermuda shorts, flamer. Any knowledgeable cop would probably prefer the 100 round magazine because they are all after market products and have a reputation for jamming which happened to the Aurora Theater shooter.
downhill246

Boca Raton, FL

#1816 Jan 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how I am able to post the entire thing, spoogebreath, and how SCOTUS keeps reminding gun gnutters that there are more than 11 words there.
Wipe your chin, you are a mess!

It was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court definitively came down on the side of an “individual rights” theory. Relying on new scholarship regarding the origins of the Amendment, the Court in District of Columbia v. Heller confirmed what had been a growing consensus of legal scholars – that the rights of the
Second Amendment adhered to individuals. The Court reached this conclusion after a textual analysis of the Amendment, an examination of the historical use of prefatory phrases in statutes, and a detailed exploration of the 18th century meaning of phrases found in the Amendment. Although accepting that the historical
and contemporaneous use of the phrase “keep and bear Arms” often arose in connection with military activities, the Court noted that its use was not limited to those contexts. Further, the Court found that the phrase “well regulated Militia” referred not to formally organized state or federal militias, but to the pool of able-bodied men” who were available for conscription. Finally, the Court reviewed contemporaneous state constitutions,post-enactment commentary, and subsequent case law to conclude that the purpose of the right to keep and bear arms extended beyond the context of militia service to include self-defense.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2008/p...

You get easier and easier. You should spend less time giving BJs and more time doing research so that you at least appear knowledgeable, flamer.. But no, it seems you are determined to die stupid, barefooted and with sore knees.

Since: Aug 10

Cathouse Mouse

#1817 Jan 28, 2013
downhill246 wrote:
<quoted text>
It was not until 2008 that the Supreme Court definitively came down on the side of an “individual rights” theory. Relying on new scholarship regarding the origins of the Amendment, the Court in District of Columbia v. Heller confirmed what had been a growing consensus of legal scholars – that the rights of the
Second Amendment adhered to individuals.
^^^ I would like for you to focus on this particular part of what you wrote ^^^

Nobody is arguing that. Not here - not in Washington D.C.

You, nor anyone else here can provide any piece of legislative proposals by any Congress member -NOR- the President that violates your right to arm yourself.

You can't do it so don't waste any time trying.

“Denver/ science and tech, ”

Level 1

Since: Apr 08

Denver,

#1822 Jan 29, 2013
weapons are for protection not just hunting or sport, prisoners who escape from jail or those who steal or brake into homes will have a key to get in if they know an untrained simple weapon,issued by your government, has little chance of hitting the bad guy. China and Russia want Americans to have cheap weapons to defend themselves to rely so as to depend on the government so Americans will vote to have a socialist government voted on in the middle of the night and override the the constitution as this president has been the best at doing .The Constitution is the start of freedoms ,,not the only freedom but were you cant reduce any of them from . It is were our country's laws and freedoms starts. Americans are to have arms to defend the country if called on in 24 hours ,will you show up with a silly one round powder rifle.Some people will never get the facts as we are being attacked by the news casters who have to play the game of physiological warfare that AMERICA IS FAMOUS FOR AND ITS PLAYING IT JUST AS THE BOOK SPELLS IT OUT FOR THEM TO PLAY IT OUT. WE AS AMERICANS NEED A NEW PARTY THE OLD ONES ARE OUT OF TOUCH, LETS CALL THE NEW PARTY THE''THE FREE AMERICANS PARTY ''

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#1823 Jan 29, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Have to LOVE these gun gnutters who cannot seem to remember the ENTIRE second amendment.
As we all know: a partial truth is a lie.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

And it still means what it means... Sad that you can't get passed your immaturity to have an honest discussion.
The Infantile left Winged

Chico, CA

#1824 Jan 29, 2013
You liberals are the stupidest lemming morons!
==========

According to New York state Senator Greg Ball (R), the Department of Homeland Security is seeking 7,000 self-defense weapons--all of which are AR-15 variants.
These are the very weapons Sens. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Chuck Schumer (D-NY), and Joe Manchin (D-WV), have been telling us nobody needs for self-defense. Apparently, DHS disagrees.
As I wrote on January 14th, a "Personal Defense Weapons Solicitation" was circulated within DHS describing an AR-15 variant as "suitable for personal defense." Now, 7,000 such weapons are being sought.
DHS is also seeking 30 round magazines for use with all the rifles.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1825 Jan 29, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

And it still means what it means...
It means what it means, not what gun gnutters like you who have to cut it in half to insist it means something else.

I've pointed to Scalia's direct quotes (a direct, exact quote, word for word... something unfamiliar with the gun gnutters) which points to the CONSTITUTIONALITY of restrictions on particularly intrusive weapons (such as the list of assault weapons that have inflected such harm on Americans up to date).

Facts are obstacles to everything you utter.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1826 Jan 29, 2013
The Infantile left Winged wrote:
According to New York state Senator Greg Ball (R), the Department of Homeland Security is seeking 7,000 self-defense weapons--all of which are AR-15 variants
Senator Greg Ball (R) <-- do se the **R***

You gun gnutters are the stupidest lemming morons!

An AR-15 is an AR-15.

And it isn't a "self-defense" weapon, it is a tiny-dicked boy toy.

Only a gun gnutter would insist putting lipstick on a AR-15 pig and calling it something else.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#1827 Jan 29, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It means what it means, not what gun gnutters like you who have to cut it in half to insist it means something else.
I've pointed to Scalia's direct quotes (a direct, exact quote, word for word... something unfamiliar with the gun gnutters) which points to the CONSTITUTIONALITY of restrictions on particularly intrusive weapons (such as the list of assault weapons that have inflected such harm on Americans up to date).
Facts are obstacles to everything you utter.
It means Americans have the right to firearms and not you, Scallia, the government, or Feinstein can do anything infringe on that right. That’s the FACT.

Since: Aug 10

Cathouse Mouse

#1828 Jan 29, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
It means what it means, not what gun gnutters like you who have to cut it in half to insist it means something else.
I've pointed to Scalia's direct quotes (a direct, exact quote, word for word... something unfamiliar with the gun gnutters) which points to the CONSTITUTIONALITY of restrictions on particularly intrusive weapons (such as the list of assault weapons that have inflected such harm on Americans up to date).
Facts are obstacles to everything you utter.
Those who you argue this issue with have been reduced to a small group. I have recently dubbed them "Cling-Ons" in concert with their backwoods stubborness to heed to the will of the vast majority of the nation concerning gun safety ... and of course, the fitting terminology, "Cling on to their God and their guns".

Thusd, "Cling-Ons" seems to be the appropriate term to describe this group of neandrathals, because "neandrathal" would undoubtably be a word they would have to Google before understanding my point in general.

Wouldn't you agree?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Denver Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Points in the Game (Jul '11) 57 min Sniper II 1,259
last post wins! (Feb '11) 59 min Sniper II 24,848
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr KiMerde 5,267
Housewife convicted of frying husband (Mar '07) 7 hr Maverick 808 56
Republicans the party of LIARS (Dec '11) 9 hr tbird19482 14,215
Memory Foam mattress (Aug '13) 9 hr Ted Smith 11
Teacher back in class after Bush-Hitler comparison (Mar '06) 17 hr swedenforever 93
Denver Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Denver People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Denver News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Denver

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:20 am PST

NBC Sports 8:20AM
De'Anthony Thomas garners AFC special teams player of the week honors
Bleacher Report10:00 AM
NFL Week 16 Picks: Game-by-Game Over/Under Predictions
Bleacher Report 5:47 PM
Denver Broncos vs. Cincinnati Bengals Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
Bleacher Report 5:58 PM
Kansas City Chiefs vs. Pittsburgh Steelers Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
Bleacher Report 9:09 PM
Breaking Down New York's Game Plan