US school shooting revives gun debate

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
I did not say he was a slave holder.
Follow the thread, donglicker. I said you were fond of quoting founding fathers- most of whom were slave holders.
Webster was not a slave holder himself, but- if you can read- you can see he suggested putting other abolitionists in jail for coming from the south and sharing the opinion that slavery should be abolished.
Now what the slave owners has to do with the topic of this sentence is anyone's guess, are you going to come back to it someday?

If your nose grew every time you told a lie you could enter the next Olympics as an all natural pole vaulter.

You-
"Thanks for the quotes from all those slave owners, though."

Only one was a slave owner so you lied.

[just another guy]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
If your nose grew every time you told a lie you could enter the next Olympics as an all natural pole vaulter.
You-
"Thanks for the quotes from all those slave owners, though."
Only one was a slave owner so you lied.

Interesting how the founders also wrote the first which the left uses and swears by. Guess they think the Constitution is like a menu rather than a foundation.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

You-
"Thanks for the quotes from all those slave owners, though."
Only one was a slave owner so you lied.

Do you want me to remind you of your other fondling father quotes, donglicker?

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Interesting how the founders also wrote the first which the left uses and swears by.

Why don't you show everyone the founders I swear by, JustGayGuy?

[just another guy]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why don't you show everyone the founders I swear by, JustGayGuy?

I see no reason to subject me to your gay fantasies simply because you are unable to comprehend the English language.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
I see no reason to subject me to your gay fantasies

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

Wipe your chin, Jaggoff.

And time for you to come in to change the batteries in your ankle bracelet.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you want me to remind you of your other fondling father quotes, donglicker?

Fondling father? LOL, that explains your gay fetish. See, confession is good for the soul.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Fondling father? LOL, that explains your gay fetish..

Pedophilia has not a thing to do with being gay, I am sure the court explained that all to you under the terms of your parole.

And you have already shown us how fond you are of the founding fathers, the majority of whom owned slaves...

Happy to point out your spelling errors, though, Donglicker.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Pedophilia has not a thing to do with being gay, I am sure the court explained that all to you under the terms of your parole.
And you have already shown us how fond you are of the founding fathers, the majority of whom owned slaves...
Happy to point out your spelling errors, though, Donglicker.

You mean you being gay and being a pedophile are two separate genetic defects? Is your propensity for having gay sex with farm animals a third distinct defect or is it related to one of the other two, or both? Happy to point out your spelling errors, flamer.

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
Wipe your chin, Jaggoff.
And time for you to come in to change the batteries in your ankle bracelet.

Didn't anyone ever teach you that you shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction? Maybe your GED didn't cover that fact.

[just another guy]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean you being gay and being a pedophile are two separate genetic defects? Is your propensity for having gay sex with farm animals a third distinct defect or is it related to one of the other two, or both? Happy to point out your spelling errors, flamer.

I think barefool is on here looking for dates. A sane person would grasp that it won't work after the first several thousand unsuccessful attempts.
The only good thing about barefool is the number of people it has converted to conservative. No sane person would align themselves with barefool.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
STFU.
You don't know what you are talking about.
Cuba has 'democratic processes' and so did the USSR.
The USA is a democratic federal constitutional republic, I don't need your uninformed, high school drop out opinion, especially since it seems you lack the ability to move any further in your education.
Get your GED and get back to me.
The first question will be: Is the USA a democracy?

Apparently you do.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't even know that the USA is a democracy.
I don't expect you know what the Bill of Rights is.

You don’t know that it isn’t, nor do you UNDERSTAD the Bill of Rights either.

Public school.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Impose?
So you got no further in English than you did in civics.
You are a waste of time.

And you're just a scare little waste.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean you being gay and being a pedophile are two separate genetic defects?

Are you saying you prefer taking on men at both ends at once?

Must make it hard to type... but not impossible, as you have proven.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't anyone ever teach you that you shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction?

No one who knows what they are talking about would say such a thing, Donglicker.

(quote)
Conjunctions to start sentences

If anyone tells you starting sentence with a coordinating conjunction (and, but, for, nor, or, so, yet) is incorrect, hand them any piece of professional writing and have them take a look. In literature, journalism, speeches, and formal writing of all kinds, using these conjunctions to start sentences is more than just acceptable; it’s ubiquitous. Open any book, even one with technical, scholarly, or otherwise formal writing, and you are likely to find numerous examples. There are exceptions, of course, but these are rare. That there is some sort of rule against sentence-beginning conjunctions is an old myth that never seems to go away despite the fact that it is not at all borne out in the writing of actual English speakers.

There are many reasons to start a sentence with a coordinating conjunction (as far as we know, nobody questions the use of subordinating and correlative conjunctions to start sentences). For instance, sometimes it helps create the tone of an afterthought or a second guess—e.g.,“I think I’ll go to the store. Or maybe I’ll just stay home.” Sometimes it helps create a smoother transition between sentences—e.g.,“If you don’t like conjunctions at the beginnings of sentences, then don’t use them. And if you don’t mind them, then don’t worry about it.” Sometimes it helps move an argument or narrative forward—e.g.,“When he went to bed that night, he was human. So he was surprised to wake up the next morning with paws instead of hands.” Sometimes sentence-beginning conjunctions just sound right. Fluent English speakers need not question their instincts on this.

As with many longstanding English myths, there are people who feel strongly about this one. But there is no reason to appease these people in this case—except perhaps when they happen to be our teachers or bosses—as this myth is especially useless, and the sooner it’s forgotten, the better.

[barefoot2626]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't anyone ever teach you that you shouldn't start a sentence with a conjunction?

Fewer words:

"But there is no reason to appease these people in this case—except perhaps when they happen to be our teachers or bosses—as this myth is especially useless, and the sooner it’s forgotten, the better."

Wipe your chin, donglicker.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently you do.

Clearly I do, Shug.

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
You don’t know that it isn’t, nor do you UNDERSTAD the Bill of Rights either.
Public school.

Have to love it when someone who can't spell insists someone else has intelligence problems...

And puts it in CAPS to boot...

HAHAHAHAAHAH!

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>Have to love it when someone who can't spell insists someone else has intelligence problems...

And puts it in CAPS to boot...

HAHAHAHAAHAH!

Typos are what they are... And Americans still have the right to have firearms. No matter how scared you are little guy. Now go spread the word that America is a democracy and be laughed at.