US school shooting revives gun debate

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
You liberal lemming dope!
The NRA is NOT fighting hard to stop background checks, They are questioning those who get chosen to do, and how background checks are performed! They / we don't want any liberal lemming idiots like you doing them with your biased ignorance!!!
And liar... you have any links to back up your stupid claim?

The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases despite polls indicating that most NRA members don’t share his position.

The NRA’s Wayne LaPierre said on “Fox News Sunday” that background checks for all gun purchases would lead to a national registry of gun owners. Critics say such a registry could lead to taxes on guns or to confiscation.

Poor teabagger.

[Wall Street Government]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
And only scared little boys are trying to get government to take away Americans rights.

The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.

In fact, teabaggers embraced it.

[The Infantile left Winged]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases despite polls indicating that most NRA members don’t share his position.
The NRA’s Wayne LaPierre said on “Fox News Sunday” that background checks for all gun purchases would lead to a national registry of gun owners. Critics say such a registry could lead to taxes on guns or to confiscation.
Poor teabagger.

You dense dope!!! You just don't get it???
That supports EXACTLY what I posted, you liberal lemming moron!

[Respect71]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.

In fact, teabaggers embraced it.

Lol.

[The Infantile left Winged]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
The same "scared" little boys didn't have crap to say when the "Patriot" Act was passed.
In fact, teabaggers embraced it.

And neither did you oblamerbot lemmings when he extended it, did you??? YOU IDIOTS!!!
==========
Obama signs Patriot Act extensions
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/...

But what? That's different for some stupid liberal reason???

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
You dense dope!!! You just don't get it???
That supports EXACTLY what I posted, you liberal lemming moron!

The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases.

What a dumshit.

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
And neither did you oblamerbot lemmings when he extended it, did you??? YOU IDIOTS!!!
==========
Obama signs Patriot Act extensions
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/...
But what? That's different for some stupid liberal reason???

He only extended 3 provisions of it, and he didn't create it.

It would take congress to repeal it.

Teabaggers wouldn't do that.

No it's NOT different but it just proves, teabaggers blame democrats for policies they implemented.

Then WHINE about it.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
From the Denver Post
"On Friday in initial debate over the bill, state Rep. Joe Salazar, D-Thorton, still offered an amendment that clarifies manufacturers could still sell high-capacity magazines to out-of-state vendors

You're thinking that I care? Or that it matters?

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
The women of America are not afraid of people being armed.

You are a c/s m/f liar.

But we knew that already.

They certainly are and they have good reason for it: women are going to be killed by their husbands, not by burglars.

PS:

WASHINGTON (AP)- The fight over gun control reflects a battle of the sexes. American women say stricter weapon laws would curb violence while men want better enforcement of existing laws, an Associated Press poll finds.

The poll notes some erosion of overall support for tougher gun laws since the days immediately following the deadly school shootings last April in Colorado, but still offers plenty of ammunition to both sides of the debate in a divided Congress.

The telephone survey by ICR of Media, Pa., found 56 percent of American adults favored stricter gun laws and 39 percent opposed. Sixty-six percent of women favored the tougher laws, compared with 45 percent of men. Thirty percent of women and 49 percent of men were opposed

[barefoot2626]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

The NRA is NOT fighting hard to stop background checks,

It has, it is, and the only time it doesn't fight background checks- or closing gun show loop holes- is when it sees it is going to lose the fight at which point they pretend they were always for ut and just want input on the rules.

ALWAYS.

[just another guy]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're thinking that I care? Or that it matters?

We know all you care about is your gay fantasies.

It matters because it shows what hypocrites the lunatic left are.

[_Twisted Wicked_]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a c/s m/f liar.
But we knew that already.
They certainly are and they have good reason for it: women are going to be killed by their husbands, not by burglars.
PS:
WASHINGTON (AP)- The fight over gun control reflects a battle of the sexes. American women say stricter weapon laws would curb violence while men want better enforcement of existing laws, an Associated Press poll finds.
The poll notes some erosion of overall support for tougher gun laws since the days immediately following the deadly school shootings last April in Colorado, but still offers plenty of ammunition to both sides of the debate in a divided Congress.
The telephone survey by ICR of Media, Pa., found 56 percent of American adults favored stricter gun laws and 39 percent opposed. Sixty-six percent of women favored the tougher laws, compared with 45 percent of men. Thirty percent of women and 49 percent of men were opposed

Good thing that 56% cannot change the Constitution, now ain`t it?

[just another guy]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a c/s m/f liar.
But we knew that already.
They certainly are and they have good reason for it: women are going to be killed by their husbands, not by burglars.
PS:
WASHINGTON (AP)- The fight over gun control reflects a battle of the sexes. American women say stricter weapon laws would curb violence while men want better enforcement of existing laws, an Associated Press poll finds.
The poll notes some erosion of overall support for tougher gun laws since the days immediately following the deadly school shootings last April in Colorado, but still offers plenty of ammunition to both sides of the debate in a divided Congress.
The telephone survey by ICR of Media, Pa., found 56 percent of American adults favored stricter gun laws and 39 percent opposed. Sixty-six percent of women favored the tougher laws, compared with 45 percent of men. Thirty percent of women and 49 percent of men were opposed

Yep they are afraid. That is why 60% of permits are now issued to women.

And once again the Constitution is not subject to the most recent poll. Unless you can get enough votes to amend the 2nd stands.

Oh , how about you find a lie I have told. You keep making that claim.

[The Infantile left Winged]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
He only extended 3 provisions of it, and he didn't create it.
It would take congress to repeal it.
Teabaggers wouldn't do that.
No it's NOT different but it just proves, teabaggers blame democrats for policies they implemented.
Then WHINE about it.

Of course it's different! It's oblamer the marxist liberal doing it.
You morons are so predictable!!!

[Brad]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
The National Rifle Association’s executive vice president continued to oppose background checks for all gun purchases.
What a dumshit.

Its an entire industry that supports hundreds of thousands of jobs domestically.
Anyone involved in the business would be insane not to try and protect and promote a product consumers strongly demand.

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it's different! It's oblamer the marxist liberal doing it.
You morons are so predictable!!!

I stand corrected, it IS "different".

Because Obama extended republican policies that makes it ALL Obama's fault and worse than creating those policies.

The bizarro world of teabaggers.

You fit perfectly.

Poor teabagger.

[Wall Street Government]

Brad wrote:

<quoted text>
Its an entire industry that supports hundreds of thousands of jobs domestically.
Anyone involved in the business would be insane not to try and protect and promote a product consumers strongly demand.

Valid point.

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it's different! It's oblamer the marxist liberal doing it.
You morons are so predictable!!!

"Obama won't change our policies".

Wah! Wah! Wah!

Poor teabagger.

[The Infantile left Winged]

Wall Street Government wrote:

<quoted text>
I stand corrected, it IS "different".
Because Obama extended republican policies that makes it ALL Obama's fault and worse than creating those policies.
The bizarro world of teabaggers.
You fit perfectly.
Poor teabagger.

So it is just fine now that oblamer has extended it.

And lemming... how do you feel about this?
And why aren't you crying and screaming about this?
Is it because it is oblamer???
==========
President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Into Law.

President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) today, allowing indefinite detention to be codified into law.
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/pr...

[downhill246]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
Robeson County Sheriff's Office investigating fatal shooting near Red Springs; two dead, at least one injured
LUMBERTON - The Robeson County Sheriff's Office is investigating a shooting Wednesday that left two people dead and two others injured, Sheriff Kenneth Sealey said.
Sealey said an unidentified woman called 911 at 5:30 p.m. and said her husband was threatening to shoot her. A few minutes later, the same woman called back and said shots had been fired, Sealey said.
When deputies arrived at the home, at 12156 N.C. 211 about two miles east of Red Springs, they found two women dead from gunshot wounds.
Two men also were injured, he said. One was taken to Southeastern Regional Medical Center in Lumberton. He was expected to be taken to Chapel Hill for treatment of his injuries, Sealey said. Information about the men's injuries was not available.
The shooting remains under investigation but appears to be a domestic incident, Sealey said.
The names of the women were not released because the next of kin had not been notified, Sealey said.

2 Conn. deaths blamed on carbon monoxide poisoning
Updated: Monday, 11 Feb 2013, 2:29 PM EST
Published : Monday, 11 Feb 2013, 7:55 AM EST

MERIDEN, Conn.(AP/WTNH)— Meriden police say they suspect carbon monoxide poisoning killed two people found inside a snow-covered car parked in a driveway.

The bodies of a 20-year-old man and an 18-year-old woman were found Sunday morning. Police told the Record-Journal of Meriden there were paths shoveled alongside the vehicle, but the rest of it was covered with snow and the windows were rolled up.

The victims' names haven't been released. Autopsies are planned. If their deaths are related to the blizzard, that would bring the number of storm-related deaths in the state to seven.

State police on Monday released the name of a 79-year-old Prospect woman killed by a hit-and-run driver while she was using her snow-blower Friday night. Troopers are still seeking the driver of the car that hit Mary McCormack.

In Shelton, police say Raymond McPadden, 49, of Darrin Drive, died in his vehicle while plowing his private driveway. An autopsy is underway to determine how he died.

In New Milford, a 53-year-old man died Friday night while shoveling snow. His name was not available.