Hickenlooper supported gun magazine l...

Hickenlooper supported gun magazine limit because of staffer promise

There are 25 comments on the Daily Camera story from Jun 19, 2014, titled Hickenlooper supported gun magazine limit because of staffer promise. In it, Daily Camera reports that:

Gov. John Hickenlooper told county sheriffs at a recent gathering he felt conflicted about supporting a bill that limited ammunition magazines, but because one of his "staff made a commitment," he felt compelled to sign it into law.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Camera.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#24 Jun 22, 2014
Tory II wrote:
<quoted text>'barefoot'= original commie
TORY II = never served, never will.

Course... we don't need any more traitors, the original Tories were more than enough.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Level 1

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#25 Jun 22, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<
uh..huh.. and he was speaking for the majority and he is of course right wing.
He's full of crap. The 2nd amendment prohibits all govts from regulating our weapons. He doesn't speak for me. He speaks for communists like you.

“Constitutionist/ SAF”

Level 1

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#26 Jun 22, 2014
barefoot2626 wrote:
<
TORY II = never served, never will.
Course... we don't need any more traitors, the original Tories were more than enough.
Six years, 1st and 2nd Mar Div.

Level 5

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#27 Jun 22, 2014
Tory II wrote:
<quoted text>He's full of crap.
He has a job.

And a high school diploma.

Control your envy as best you can, Vance.

KarlVIIIII

“No Tea for Me”

Since: Nov 13

Centennial, Co

#28 Jul 4, 2014
The strongest argument for gun control is found in the 2nd amendment itself, which reads:

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Read it again:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What does "well regulated" mean? In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the U.S. Supreme Court stated that

the adjective 'well-regulated' implies nothing more than the imposition of proper discipline and training.

What is the mechanism by which "proper discipline and training" is provided to members of this militia?

How well disciplined was Adam Lanza? James Holmes? Jared Loughner? Cho Seung Hui? etc...

Until this so-called militia is being adequately regulated, the purported right of the people to keep and bear arms MUST be infringed. If it is not regulated (or infringed upon), such a militia actually undermines and threatens the security of the state.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Denver Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr cpeter1313 60,830
Republicans the party of LIARS (Dec '11) 15 hr Respect71 30,637
last post wins! (Feb '11) 15 hr Princess Hey 26,437
Respect71 is a hypocritical LOSER (Dec '15) 23 hr Respect71 23
COLORADO the NEW CALIFORNIA Sat CO IS FULL 7
Time to Chill it's 4/20!! Apr 20 Native Landlord 1
Damascus will fall, America will be invaded, Wa... Apr 19 BraveHeart 1

Denver Jobs

Personal Finance

Denver Mortgages