Republicans the party of LIARS

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10214 Dec 19, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really this stupid, just incredibly stubborn or a dumbed down tea party puppet
OBVIOUSLY ALL THREE.....
Here from a right wing NUT JOB website, FOR THE LAST TIME
The Supreme Court delivered its decision on the controversial “individual mandate” embedded in President Obama’s landmark healthcare bill, ruling that it is constitutional.
https://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/06/2...

Level 2

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10215 Dec 19, 2012
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>

The law was found constitutional ONLY by IMPOSING a tax upon citizens (middle-class and below mostly very young and starting out)
Exactly, I think you are beginning to catch on The Individual Mandate was deemed CONSTITUTIONAL as a TAX
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
NOT to mention NUMEROUS other taxes on property, investments ect… and you’re okay with that FACT?
Yes, absolutely. I do not mind paying more taxes as long as Americans have health insurance. Simply because I have been paying anyway through higher insurance premiums.

You right wing radicals like to paint the world black and white but there are many shades of gray you ignore (conveniently)

“If you can't beat um join um”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Under the troll bridge

#10216 Dec 19, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, I think you are beginning to catch on The Individual Mandate was deemed CONSTITUTIONAL as a TAX
<quoted text>
Yes, absolutely. I do not mind paying more taxes as long as Americans have health insurance. Simply because I have been paying anyway through higher insurance premiums.
You right wing radicals like to paint the world black and white but there are many shades of gray you ignore (conveniently)
Read the ruling Karl. It was unconstitutional as a mandate. It was deemed unconstitutional under the interstate commerce clause. The Supremes then overstepped their power and changed the mandate to a tax and declared the exact thing they just called unconstitutional as constitutional under the alteration they made to the bill. The Supremes are not supposed to re-write law but only interpret it.
ONE MORE TIME Karl. It was deemed unconstitutional as a MANDATE under the Interstate Commerce clause. That would be like Socialism. Then they called it a TAX and said the same exact thing was ok as a TAX.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10217 Dec 19, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, I think you are beginning to catch on The Individual Mandate was deemed CONSTITUTIONAL as a TAX
<quoted text>
Yes, absolutely. I do not mind paying more taxes as long as Americans have health insurance. Simply because I have been paying anyway through higher insurance premiums.
You right wing radicals like to paint the world black and white but there are many shades of gray you ignore (conveniently)
“Exactly, I think you are beginning to catch on The Individual Mandate was deemed CONSTITUTIONAL as a TAX” EXATLY! No longer a mandate BECAUSE it was UNCONSTITUTIONAL… Which is how they sold it, but now it's a TAX which is what Obama pledged NOT to do. LIAR? And you’re okay with this HUGE middle-class and poor TAX hike?

“Yes, absolutely. I do not mind paying more taxes as long as Americans have health insurance. Simply because I have been paying anyway through higher insurance premiums.” Now you will get the best of BOTH worlds because mandating “pre-existing conditions” will make your premiums skyrocket, and more taxes which mean less of your own earning go to you… which means you are a advocate of socialism. Oh and did you google N.I.C.E.? That’s an economic inevitability.

“You right wing radicals like to paint the world black and white but there are many shades of gray you ignore (conveniently)” There is nothing radical about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and of course there is grey but not when there isn’t which progressive liberals always try to pain grey based on their feelings.

“Its Eaiser to fool people than”

Since: Sep 11

convince them they are a fool

#10218 Dec 20, 2012
Forget the fiscal crisis, Obama's plans threaten our American spirit

By Jon Kraushar

Published December 11, 2012

FoxNews.com

America faces a philosophical "cliff" even more dangerous than the impending "fiscal cliff."

The highest stake in the game of chicken between President Obama and the Republicans isn’t money—it is mindset.

Throughout its history, America has been richer or poorer in money. But what has made our country so exceptional, from its founding, has been a constant store of philosophical wealth. In America, a person’s wealth (whether material or spiritual) used to be defined by a dedication to the virtue of striving.

What made every American great was a belief in potential—a belief that there are no limits to what an individual can produce for him (or her) self, instead of relying on a government to give away, take away and redistribute. It was a belief that abundance is virtually limitless in human capability, but it is unvirtuously limited by big government.

President Obama is trying to transform America from a society of aspiration to a society of envy.

-

In Obama’s new abnormal America, the national diet for many citizens is changing from high fiber ambition for upward mobility to high fat consumption of an ever-expanding gravy boat of entitlements, ladled out by ceaseless government spending.

As The Heritage Foundation points out,“Today, more people than ever before—67.3 million Americans, from college students to retirees to welfare beneficiaries—depend on the federal government for housing, food, income, student aid, or other assistance once considered to be the responsibility of individuals, families, neighborhoods, churches, and other civil society institutions.”

Federal entitlements consume 62 percent of federal outlays—the highest level in our nation’s history. The Declaration of Independence that created America is being distorted into a Declaration of Dependency encouraged by President Obama. This is not just a crisis of the wallet. It is a crisis of the soul.

What is happening now—the way in which Mr. Obama really wants to “fundamentally transform America”—is that he wants to use the fiscal cliff to propel us over a far more perilous philosophical cliff, which is bottomless in its destructive depth.

I can only conclude that the president is trying to transform America from a society of aspiration to a society of envy—and if that happens, America risks falling into a philosophical poverty that could starve our country’s uniqueness to death.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/12/11/for ...

“Its Eaiser to fool people than”

Since: Sep 11

convince them they are a fool

#10219 Dec 20, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, I think you are beginning to catch on The Individual Mandate was deemed CONSTITUTIONAL as a TAX
<quoted text>
Yes, absolutely. I do not mind paying more taxes as long as Americans have health insurance. Simply because I have been paying anyway through higher insurance premiums.
You right wing radicals like to paint the world black and white but there are many shades of gray you ignore (conveniently)
Heres some gray for ya..More people unemployed means less people paying taxes and in to our already fragile system.

Number of Americans seeking unemployment aid rises

Published December 20, 2012

Associated Press

The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits rose last week by 17,000, reversing four weeks of declines. But the number of people seeking aid is consistent with a job market that continues to grow modestly.

Unemployment claims rose the week of Dec. 15 to a seasonally adjusted 361,000 from a revised 344,000 the week before.

The less-volatile four-week moving average fell 13,750 to 367,750, lowest since late October. Applications had surged in early November after Superstorm Sandy, then dropped back.

Just over 5.4 million people were receiving some type of unemployment benefit the week ended Dec. 1, down from nearly 7.2 million a year earlier.

Applications are a proxy for layoffs. So the drop of the four-week average suggests that companies are cutting fewer jobs, even if they aren't hiring enough to lower the unemployment rate significantly. The economy has generated an average of 151,000 jobs a month in 2012, not enough to significantly drive down high unemployment.

The unemployment rate did drop to a four-year low of 7.7 percent in November from 7.9 percent in October. But the rate fell mostly because unemployed people gave up looking for work. The government counts people as unemployed only if they're actively seeking jobs.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/12/20/nu...
The Infantile left Winged

Redding, CA

#10221 Dec 20, 2012
Busty Miss wrote:
Four more years of Snippy's rantings.
He must be using some really low quality not so nice buds.
I found a perfect definition of you!
buttsy missed!
1. A person that is a total moron and doesn't think before he/she speaks or acts.
2. One with an undescribeable idiocy, hence stupidity, poor idea of what's cool, possibly an arrogance about them.
3. One with an intolerable personality.
4. Personified by a Troll named Eniquity, that constantly trolls Darkpear forums, random smack talking emo n00b, filled with a false sense of self worth

Level 2

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10224 Dec 20, 2012
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing radical about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
So do you consider the Constitution a Living Document and our form of Government an experiment, allowing policies to change in order to meet the greater good of the people?

“Its Eaiser to fool people than”

Since: Sep 11

convince them they are a fool

#10225 Dec 20, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
So do you consider the Constitution a Living Document and our form of Government an experiment, allowing policies to change in order to meet the greater good of the people?
Not un voted changes like obama wants to make.
sociopathic Liberals

Orland, CA

#10227 Dec 20, 2012
Busty Miss wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop trying to suck up to Sniper. Your constant attempts to show him how much you love him is gross.
As far as your 1-4 comments, perhaps if you actually knew anything....well, that is just impossible.
No sucking up to anyone! Just describing the real you! LOL
sociopathic Liberals

Orland, CA

#10229 Dec 20, 2012
Busty Miss wrote:
<quoted text>
As you aren't even real, your describing anything is impossible.
You are in love with Sniper. You dream about him constantly and wish he would return your love.
I shall describe you...
shallow, cold, heartless, callous, uneducated, ill-informed, rude, and best of all, stupid as hell!
But... hey stupid! On the other thread you just said that I am sniper!!!
So the evidence is really leaning towards, it is you who is the one who is...
shallow, cold, heartless, callous, uneducated, ill-informed, rude, and best of all, stupid as hell!

And the funniest part of those like you? You idiots just don't know when to stop making complete idiots out of yourselves!!! LMAO

“Invisible Pink Unicorn”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#10230 Dec 20, 2012
sociopathic Liberals wrote:
<quoted text>
But... hey stupid! On the other thread you just said that I am sniper!!!
So the evidence is really leaning towards, it is you who is the one who is...
shallow, cold, heartless, callous, uneducated, ill-informed, rude, and best of all, stupid as hell!
And the funniest part of those like you? You idiots just don't know when to stop making complete idiots out of yourselves!!! LMAO
High scoring, somewhat sociopathic Presidents?

Teddy Roosevelt, JFK, FDR, Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr.

Low scoring, less sociopathic Presidents?

Among others, Herbert Hoover and Harry Truman.

PS: sniper has so many sock puppets it's hard to keep up.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10233 Dec 20, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
So do you consider the Constitution a Living Document and our form of Government an experiment, allowing policies to change in order to meet the greater good of the people?
“So do you consider the Constitution a Living Document” The U.S. Constitution is living in the sense there is the ability to make amendments with strong Congressional procedures to do so. This is why there are few amendments… The U.S. Constitution are the words that are contained within, and NOT what we hope or change their meaning to suit our personal desires.

“and our form of Government an experiment, allowing policies to change in order to meet the greater good of the people?” Our government should be for the people by the people, however it’s slowly achieving it’s own powers and removing liberties from Americans. OBAMACARE is a law that is very effective and a great example of this.

The fact that Dems passed a law with a “individual mandate” to force Americans to buy something WITH OUT CHOICE, should have been your first clue… It could not withstand our constitutional rights and failed, and as a result is a tax for the middle and lower classes, which our president said he wouldn’t do… Liar?

Again, there is nothing radical about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10234 Dec 20, 2012
Jammercolo wrote:
<quoted text>
High scoring, somewhat sociopathic Presidents?
Teddy Roosevelt, JFK, FDR, Reagan, Bill Clinton, George Bush Jr.
Low scoring, less sociopathic Presidents?
Among others, Herbert Hoover and Harry Truman.
PS: sniper has so many sock puppets it's hard to keep up.
Based on what criteria?

“Invisible Pink Unicorn”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#10235 Dec 20, 2012
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
Based on what criteria?
The study was published in the September 2012 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm...

For $11.95 you can read the whole study found at link above.

“Invisible Pink Unicorn”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

#10236 Dec 20, 2012
Busty Miss wrote:
<quoted text>
You are correct, Jammercolo. The best part is when he forgets what name he posted under and then ends up posting to himself.
What a goofball.
I don't believe he forgets.I believe he does it on purpose to make it look like he has support.

Level 2

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10237 Dec 20, 2012
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
“So do you consider the Constitution a Living Document” The U.S. Constitution is living in the sense there is the ability to make amendments with strong Congressional procedures to do so. This is why there are few amendments… The U.S. Constitution are the words that are contained within, and NOT what we hope or change their meaning to suit our personal desires.
“and our form of Government an experiment, allowing policies to change in order to meet the greater good of the people?” Our government should be for the people by the people, however it’s slowly achieving it’s own powers and removing liberties from Americans. OBAMACARE is a law that is very effective and a great example of this.
The fact that Dems passed a law with a “individual mandate” to force Americans to buy something WITH OUT CHOICE, should have been your first clue… It could not withstand our constitutional rights and failed, and as a result is a tax for the middle and lower classes, which our president said he wouldn’t do… Liar?
Again, there is nothing radical about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
State your, YOUR interpretation of the 10th amendment.

Level 2

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10238 Dec 20, 2012
Sniper II wrote:
<quoted text>Not un voted changes like obama wants to make.
Please Snippet give some EXAMPLES with sources

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10240 Dec 20, 2012
Jammercolo wrote:
<quoted text>
The study was published in the September 2012 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm...
For $11.95 you can read the whole study found at link above.
LOL... Did you participate?

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10241 Dec 20, 2012
VisionXIIX wrote:
<quoted text>
State your, YOUR interpretation of the 10th amendment.
It’s intended to establish a separation of power between the federal and state governments, as well and protect the entities from each other… Are you going to ignore my question n to you?

Is obama a liar for raising taxes on the middle and lower class in OBAMACARE?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Denver Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 39 min Beatnik 53,602
last post wins! (Feb '11) 3 hr Icnoptnthis 26,388
Respect71 is a hypocritical LOSER (Dec '15) 4 hr Avid reader 16
Play the "end of the word" game (Jul '11) 22 hr texas pete 4,272
News Democrats launch new group aimed at Republican ... Wed District10 21
word association game time (Jan '11) Tue texas pete 218
Taylor Swift touched or not touched Tue Rattlesnake Pete 2

Denver Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Denver Mortgages