Commendations for DA's Office

I am writing in response to Becky Olvera's distress over Yolo County's 98 percent felony prosecution rate.

[Former Woodlander]

ILSA VONLEDEN, Woodland - Thank you!!!!

[Charles The 1st Bronson]

The more I see and read, it is obvious that this DA is doing an impressive job. There seems to be a small but vocal group that are supporting "Criminal" rights and are unhappy about his performance. I bet law enforcement appreciates the fact that the DA is moving these cases into the system. You know that with all of the cuts in budget this last year - that we should give a nod to all of the staff and employees of the DA's office!!

[A Believer - Woodland]

ILSA VONLEDEN, Woodland - writes: An officer can only make an arrest if there is "probable cause" facts he must state in a report showing how the case meets all the elements of the crime per the California penal code.

My response: That's the stem of one of the 1st problems with the officer's report writing. The officer writes his report. The person arrested never has an opportunity to say, that's not what I said, or, no it didn't happen that way. The person arrested cannot make any corrections, additional information cannot be added to the arrest report. Then the paperwork is sent off to the DA, then the judge (correct if I'm wrong of the flow of paperwork). And when the officer is on the stand, dressed in his uniform, and reads HIS report, well, most people would believe the officer, because for one officer's don't lie under oath (yeah right). He prep's before he takes the stand and is questioned. Now, the person arrested, when does he get to see the report? That is already an official document unable to be corrected, changes made or any input from the person arrested. To me, it's absurd that all reports are true and factual; and for any jury or bystander to believe that officer's never lie make me sick to my core. Even, at the grocery store you receive a receipt then and there at the time of purchase to check if all is correct.

A Believer

[Mr Bronson or Reisig]

Charles The 1st Bronson wrote:

The more I see and read, it is obvious that this DA is doing an impressive job. There seems to be a small but vocal group that are supporting "Criminal" rights and are unhappy about his performance. I bet law enforcement appreciates the fact that the DA is moving these cases into the system. You know that with all of the cuts in budget this last year - that we should give a nod to all of the staff and employees of the DA's office!!

Drink more cool aide. The DA's office is surround by unethical acts, accusations, court over turning cases, people leaving and being forced out, cops calling Reisig out for his poor behavior and you see what a great job he is doing. Check out Cuba, Castro is your speed too.

[huh]

A Believer - Woodland wrote:

ILSA VONLEDEN, Woodland - writes: An officer can only make an arrest if there is "probable cause" facts he must state in a report showing how the case meets all the elements of the crime per the California penal code.
My response: That's the stem of one of the 1st problems with the officer's report writing. The officer writes his report. The person arrested never has an opportunity to say, that's not what I said, or, no it didn't happen that way. The person arrested cannot make any corrections, additional information cannot be added to the arrest report. Then the paperwork is sent off to the DA, then the judge (correct if I'm wrong of the flow of paperwork). And when the officer is on the stand, dressed in his uniform, and reads HIS report, well, most people would believe the officer, because for one officer's don't lie under oath (yeah right). He prep's before he takes the stand and is questioned. Now, the person arrested, when does he get to see the report? That is already an official document unable to be corrected, changes made or any input from the person arrested. To me, it's absurd that all reports are true and factual; and for any jury or bystander to believe that officer's never lie make me sick to my core. Even, at the grocery store you receive a receipt then and there at the time of purchase to check if all is correct.
A Believer

Let me ask you something if your arrested and don't have a report in front of you. Please fire your defense attorney. That is why you have attorney's. The defense also has paid investigators that gather information and evidence. A good officer will look over his report and be prepared to testify in court. Give me a break dude go throw up your core because what you just wrote is pure doo doo.

[huh]

Mr Bronson or Reisig wrote:

<quoted text>
Drink more cool aide. The DA's office is surround by unethical acts, accusations, court over turning cases, people leaving and being forced out, cops calling Reisig out for his poor behavior and you see what a great job he is doing. Check out Cuba, Castro is your speed too.

The more I read I am glad this DA's Office is working for this community. Because after reading your blog it is safe to say you probaly are in that 98%.

[This is a Joke]

A Believer - Woodland wrote:

ILSA VONLEDEN, Woodland - writes: An officer can only make an arrest if there is "probable cause" facts he must state in a report showing how the case meets all the elements of the crime per the California penal code.
My response: That's the stem of one of the 1st problems with the officer's report writing. The officer writes his report. The person arrested never has an opportunity to say, that's not what I said, or, no it didn't happen that way. The person arrested cannot make any corrections, additional information cannot be added to the arrest report. Then the paperwork is sent off to the DA, then the judge (correct if I'm wrong of the flow of paperwork). And when the officer is on the stand, dressed in his uniform, and reads HIS report, well, most people would believe the officer, because for one officer's don't lie under oath (yeah right). He prep's before he takes the stand and is questioned. Now, the person arrested, when does he get to see the report? That is already an official document unable to be corrected, changes made or any input from the person arrested. To me, it's absurd that all reports are true and factual; and for any jury or bystander to believe that officer's never lie make me sick to my core. Even, at the grocery store you receive a receipt then and there at the time of purchase to check if all is correct.
A Believer

I will correct you. The judge never sees the report of the officer and the defense gets a copy of the report during his court procedings. His attorney can add input to the report through questioning of the officer or witnesses during the Preliminary Examination or the Trial.

[The Right is funny]

huh wrote:

<quoted text>The more I read I am glad this DA's Office is working for this community. Because after reading your blog it is safe to say you probaly are in that 98%.

There you go, when someone makes a point you can't defend you start name calling and imply they are a criminal. Right out of the playbook of Mr. Reisig... ummm are you sure you are not him?

[will clark]

is it ok for an officer to lie

[Double Bogey]

Mr Bronson or Reisig wrote:

<quoted text>
Drink more cool aide. The DA's office is surround by unethical acts, accusations, court over turning cases, people leaving and being forced out, cops calling Reisig out for his poor behavior and you see what a great job he is doing. Check out Cuba, Castro is your speed too.

Please cite one case where the appeals court has overturned a conviction by the DA's office since Reisig was elected...Just ONE case.

You also throw out the unethical acts claim.

Please explain how if the DA's office is so unethical why have the hundreds of defense attorneys that practice in Yolo not joined in with these claims of unethical behavior or prosecutorial misconduct? Why hasn't the Public Defenders office spoke out about how the DA is unethical and is putting innocent people behind bars?

[go niners]

The Right is funny wrote:

<quoted text>
There you go, when someone makes a point you can't defend you start name calling and imply they are a criminal. Right out of the playbook of Mr. Reisig... ummm are you sure you are not him?

Last time I checked this DA had every single Peace Officer Association, Sheriff Association, Fire Associations vote of confidence. Please make sure you have your facts correct Mrs. Lenzi Ummm.

[Officer]

go niners wrote:

<quoted text>Last time I checked this DA had every single Peace Officer Association, Sheriff Association, Fire Associations vote of confidence. Please make sure you have your facts correct Mrs. Lenzi Ummm.

I am not Ms. anybody, I am an officer in the county and know first hand about Reisig totalitarian tactics. He will not get every law enforcement endorsement this time since the cops know he is crooked and only want his political agenda at any cost, including hiding evidence, lying and misleading the public. Mr. Gorman or Mr. Hamilton ummmm

[Charles The 1st Bronson]

Mr Bronson or Reisig wrote:

<quoted text>
Drink more cool aide. The DA's office is surround by unethical acts, accusations, court over turning cases, people leaving and being forced out, cops calling Reisig out for his poor behavior and you see what a great job he is doing. Check out Cuba, Castro is your speed too.

Dude - learn how to spell and write. No doubt you have spent your time watching the Simson's instead of reading a book. No wonder you don't support the DA - when you get out of jail go back to school.

[Glad to live in Sac]

Officer wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not Ms. anybody, I am an officer in the county and know first hand about Reisig totalitarian tactics. He will not get every law enforcement endorsement this time since the cops know he is crooked and only want his political agenda at any cost, including hiding evidence, lying and misleading the public. Mr. Gorman or Mr. Hamilton ummmm

Let's just keep it going Gore ummm. And he will get every endorsement just not yours skaggs ummm.

[Glad to live in Sac]

Officer wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not Ms. anybody, I am an officer in the county and know first hand about Reisig totalitarian tactics. He will not get every law enforcement endorsement this time since the cops know he is crooked and only want his political agenda at any cost, including hiding evidence, lying and misleading the public. Mr. Gorman or Mr. Hamilton ummmm

Oh I forgot security officer does not count. Please check this DA does have the support from these Law and Fire agencies. You would know if you actually paid into your association. Ummmm.

[Double Bogey]

Officer wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not Ms. anybody, I am an officer in the county and know first hand about Reisig totalitarian tactics. He will not get every law enforcement endorsement this time since the cops know he is crooked and only want his political agenda at any cost, including hiding evidence, lying and misleading the public. Mr. Gorman or Mr. Hamilton ummmm

Ok officer, please cite the case that Reisig withheld evidence or lied in court...since you are an "officer in the county" I am sure you can illuminate everyone with some first hand knowledge that will stand up...Personally, I cant wait.

[Charles The 1st Bronson]

Officer wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not Ms. anybody, I am an officer in the county and know first hand about Reisig totalitarian tactics.

I have heard that a number of the "old" boys are not happy because Reisig took away their County cars. For years these guys were taking these vehicles home and using them as second cars. When Reisig came in he did an audit. The result was that he told them they could use County cars from the car pool - but would have to drive their own cars to and from work. This saved the County tens of thousands of dollars - but really upset the "old" boys. No wonder we hear rumors of people upset with Reisig. It sounds like cutting out the excess in tough times is upsetting some guys who expect a free County ride!

[Guilty]

A Believer - Woodland wrote:

ILSA VONLEDEN, Woodland - writes: An officer can only make an arrest if there is "probable cause" facts he must state in a report showing how the case meets all the elements of the crime per the California penal code.
My response: That's the stem of one of the 1st problems with the officer's report writing. The officer writes his report. The person arrested never has an opportunity to say, that's not what I said, or, no it didn't happen that way. The person arrested cannot make any corrections, additional information cannot be added to the arrest report. Then the paperwork is sent off to the DA, then the judge (correct if I'm wrong of the flow of paperwork). And when the officer is on the stand, dressed in his uniform, and reads HIS report, well, most people would believe the officer, because for one officer's don't lie under oath (yeah right). He prep's before he takes the stand and is questioned. Now, the person arrested, when does he get to see the report? That is already an official document unable to be corrected, changes made or any input from the person arrested. To me, it's absurd that all reports are true and factual; and for any jury or bystander to believe that officer's never lie make me sick to my core. Even, at the grocery store you receive a receipt then and there at the time of purchase to check if all is correct.
A Believer

What is plain to see is that your post is evidence that you do NOT have a decent command of our court system. OMG

[Guilty]

ILSA, thank you for taking the time to clearly present, for our posters, a very necessary bit if information. I also felt it necessary but, to date, could not take the time. Kudos!

And, if you read this thread, you can surmise that despite your efforts, some here still don't get it!

I believe you cleared up the matter re: "prosecution" rates versus "conviction" rates (at least for some who have the ability to grasp the facts).

Thanks again and keep up the good work. Finally, thank you for your law enforcement service to our county!

[DA Emploee]

Charles The 1st Bronson wrote:

<quoted text>
I have heard that a number of the "old" boys are not happy because Reisig took away their County cars. For years these guys were taking these vehicles home and using them as second cars. When Reisig came in he did an audit. The result was that he told them they could use County cars from the car pool - but would have to drive their own cars to and from work. This saved the County tens of thousands of dollars - but really upset the "old" boys. No wonder we hear rumors of people upset with Reisig. It sounds like cutting out the excess in tough times is upsetting some guys who expect a free County ride!

Mr. Reisig takes his car home and everywhere he goes on the county dime using county gas. He also has made several new positions in the office (his personal Secretary) that he controls and are 'at will' employees, so he can fire them without cause if they disagree with him. How can you say taking cars from employees that use them is Mr. Reisig being good and concerned. You are either one of his 'at will' employees securing your job or you have have no clue the Mr. Reisig is really like and how bad he has messed up the DA's Office. We all wish Dave (DCH) would come back.