Twiggs judge who was removed from office running for county commission chair
When the Georgia Supreme Court removed former Twiggs County Probate Judge Kenneth Fowler from office in 2010 for alleged misconduct, it barred him from ever seeking or holding an elected or appointed judicial office.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Macon Telegraph.
#1 Jun 28, 2012
If he has been removed once from public office for misbehavior what would limit him from doing it again. Twiggs County needs a fresh beginning with new leadership
#2 Jun 14, 2013
The only misbehavior Ken Fowler is guilty of is letting his conscious rule his decisions rather than the crooks who demanded rulings in their own favor. This can be proven by looking at the persons who sought to expel him and what their motives were.
#3 Jul 2, 2013
You are so right, when will the people of Twiggs get it, they have to start making better choices when it comes to electing people to lead them. This organization has been corrupted for years especially this Ken Fowler creep!
#4 Apr 4, 2014
power to bring back acquittals.
At the beginning of a criminal trial, jurors are typically asked to swear that they will well and truly try and a true deliverance make between the United States and the defendant at the bar, and a true verdict render according to the evidence, so help [me] God.
Aside from being barely intelligible to most jurors, theres no reason why a juror might not acquit based solely on the evidence if they believe the accused harmed no one or that a conviction would be unjust. As for what it means to make a true deliverance, nobody alive today knows for sure what that means.
We can set the law in such a way where the defense will be in control. It will be up to the defense to make a jury nullification argument to the jury. Or its up to the defense to ask for a jury nullification instruction from the judge. Its a tactical decision, just like whether or not the defendant will testify or not in court. Its totally up to the defense to exercise the option or not.
While the law might sometimes be unfair, jury nullification rests on the assumption that 12 randomly chosen individuals are entitled to override the democratically expressed will of the citizenry. Its true that there is considerable history in England and America of juries disregarding their instructions on principle. Before the Civil War, Northern juries sometimes refused to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act, preferring to forgive defendants who helped escaped slaves.
But what would you do if you were a Northern juror in 1855 deciding the guilt or innocence of an abolitionist accused of violating the Fugitive Slave Act? More to the point, assume that the prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.(Heck, assume that the defendant confessed in court to helping Southern slaves escape to Canada!)
The answer would be to convict the defendant, because jurors who disagree with legislated prohibitions are morally entitled to work to change them. But they have no business putting their preferences above what democratic institutions have decided. In other words, its more ethical to set aside your conscience to comply with an evil law (and work to change it later) than it is to nullify such a law if you have the power to do so. Thats simply ludicrous. Also, an ethical citizen can vote their conscience as a juror and work to change bad laws too.
Jury nullification does not repeal bad laws, rather it allows juries to show mercy for defendants if they believe the law is wrong or is simply being misapplied.
As the Fugitive Slave Act, the Volstead Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, and every other evil, absurd, or hysterical legislation on down to our ongoing drug laws has proven time and again legislators are hardly infallible. Jury nullification is perhaps the most important vote that citizens can use to alert law makers when their work is flawed. It does not override democracy. It is part of our democracy.
Are juries perfect? Of course not. But neither are the police officers who have discretion to make arrests. And neither are the prosecutors who, according to Butler, have more power than judges, because they have discretion over whether to charge a suspect, and for what offense. Moreover, prosecutors tend to throw the book at defendants, to compel them to plead guilty in return for less harsh sentences.
To the more than 3,200 U.S. prisoners serving life without parole for nonviolent offenses, the problem is certainly not that too many jurors are using their discretion to nullify bad laws and malicious prosecutions. Far from it. Fortunately, they have nothing to fear by informing jurors of their right, power, and duty to nullify bad laws.
Tags: jury duty, jury nullification
Add your comments below
|SCEI-1BLOOD Cult Member Arrested for Aggravated... (Jun '13)||Jan '16||Teri||6|
|Kidnapping suspect, victim found in Twiggs traf... (Dec '14)||Dec '14||Juju||1|
|Ga. high court removes, bars suspended judge (Jul '10)||Apr '14||Good people break...||2|
|The Yonder song (Jul '09)||Jan '14||Yonder||3|
|Woman seriously hurt in I-16 accident in Twiggs... (Jul '13)||Jul '13||Cindi||1|
|Twiggs Library Construction Slated to Begin in ... (Jun '12)||Jun '12||Twiggs County Res...||1|
|volunteer firefighters (Apr '12)||Apr '12||r_J_bryant||1|
Find what you want!
Search Twiggs County Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC