Right to Self-defense ELIMINATED

Right to Self-defense ELIMINATED

Posted in the Scott County Forum

AmericanCitizen

Commiskey, IN

#2 Jun 15, 2012
If the judge declared;

pg 929 transcript / Final Instructions from judge Webster

"There has been evidence introduced in this case that the accused was exercising his right of self-defense."

Their scenario does NOT create the "proper angle"

"evidence introduced in this case that the accused was exercising his right of self-defense."...what is their case

“While the jury was considering Gilmore's fate, all of its members agreed that the defendant was not guilty of murder, according to the jury foreman, Robert Kennedy”

“We (the jury) were unanimous on not guilty of murder” Kennedy said.

“We based all our feelings not on the court room procedures but the interviews in the jail house.”

The jury found the entire trial unworthy of ANY consideration...what is their case

Their scenario does NOT create the "proper angle"

What am I not understanding...seriously anyone...what is their case

If their scenario doesn't fit and jury voted to acquit....

I realize, instead of asking ...what is their case, it should say...they have no case, which everyone with half a brain realizes, however, that isn't stopping them from going to trial no matter how clear and explicit IC 35-41-3-2 is...

so since their scenario doesn't fit and the jury voted to acquit why is there a trial commencing on Monday and ...what is their case

and in all seriousness and honesty, what sort of defense counsel does nothing to address this and instead aides and abets it...

what sort of defense counsel helps to eliminate the States forensic expert who confirms the defendants account and blows the States case out the door

is it not evident that Aaron Edwards is working for the prosecution and has been appointed solely to protect the judge and prosecutor when he argues this

"11. The defendant from his filings believes the angle of a bullet and testimony from Dr. Weakly-Jones is central to his defense. He has cited this in numerous filings with the court. Counsel disagrees with this theory. Any such testimony from Dr. Weakly-Jones would have called for speculation as to the location of the defendant and alleged victim. Such speculative questions would not be permitted under the rules of evidence if objected to by the State. The State would have objected to such questions and therefore were not asked in the deposition."

"The defendant from his filings believes the angle of a bullet and testimony from Dr. Weakly-Jones is central to his defense."

"Counsel disagrees with this theory."

"Any such testimony from Dr. Weakly-Jones would have called for speculation as to the location of the defendant and alleged victim."
----------

Any such testimony from the Dr. was presented and is ON RECORD in the first trial, is court-appinted defense counsel that stupid or considers everyone else to be so...the "rules of evidence" would not allow it...good gosh just how stupid or corrupt must defense counsel be to make such an asinine statement when he's referring to testimony that has ALREADY been presented and ON RECORD

WHY is defense counsel eliminating the States forensic expert testimony that confirms the Defendants account and debunks the States scenario...if he's not working for the prosecutor

If their scenario doesn't fit and the jury voted to acquit...just doesn't matter in Jennings County

Indiana State Law IC 35-41-3-2 is more explicit then any law in the country and forbids any legal jeopardy of any kind “whatsoever” for protecting yourself.

Judges instructions; “There has been evidence introduced in this case that the accused was exercising his right of self-defense."

“While the jury was considering Gilmore's fate, all of its members agreed that the defendant was not guilty…”

Why and HOW is there a second trial commencing on Monday the 18th when IC 35-41-3-2 explicitly forbids it and their scenario doesn't fit and jury voted to acquit....

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Scott County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Needle exchange in Scott County off to slow start (Apr '15) Apr 14 Snrcitzn65 2
News As Pain Pills Change, Abusers Move To New Drugs (Jul '12) May '15 Heygirlhey 12
News HIV Epidemic Strikes an Indiana County (Apr '15) Apr '15 kimberly smith 7
News AIDS Task Force of the Ohio Valley Care Coordin... (Apr '15) Apr '15 Brandy Brimmet 1
Thanks (Mar '15) Mar '15 Bible thumper 1
pill sales (Feb '14) Mar '14 james family 2
Michelle Ragland (Apr '13) Sep '13 fu q 3
More from around the web