Gay Man Says He was Arrested - for We...

Gay Man Says He was Arrested - for Wearing a Thong

There are 65 comments on the EDGE story from Mar 14, 2012, titled Gay Man Says He was Arrested - for Wearing a Thong. In it, EDGE reports that:

A man is claiming that he is the first person in San Diego history to be arrested for public nudity for wearing a thong under a gladiator kilt during the city's gay pride event, the Courthouse News Service reported.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Lockport, NY

#64 Aug 10, 2012
He was arrested not for his dress, but for the gerbil he'd placed in his ass.
nilly welson

Greeley, CO

#65 Aug 10, 2012
Kermudgeon wrote:
He was arrested not for his dress, but for the gerbil he'd placed in his ass.
OMG! It was Richard Gere? I thought it was Barney Frank thinging a thong of thix pence, pocket full of ....


“I call it as I see it.”

Since: Jul 09

Retirement City

#66 Aug 10, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Our Nation was founded upon a very rational set of legal theories. That's why it has managed to hold together, AND adapt and change to meet new challenges.
Consider the usages of the three words in the speech of the times of our founders, and in the highly radical literature that influenced them. You will see the distinctions between them quite clearly.
Don't be stubbornly ignorant (stupid).
Aspire to learning. Do not mock and be be intimidated by it. =1zqOYBabXmAXX&feature=rel ated
Read the dictionary. The words are one and the same in meaning. Some people are so intellectually minded to the point of being no practical good.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#67 Aug 10, 2012
AdriannaRain wrote:
Omg thats sick, I mean, sum logical person please explain this funny ass story to meh?!? Itz idiotic to have A MAN WEARING STUPID ASS THONGS!!!!

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#69 Aug 10, 2012
FaFoxy wrote:
I read this story elsewhere. I think he will win his case. He wasn't nude according to what I read.
It reminds me of a case just a few years ago where a woman in Manhattan was arrested for being bare-breasted in public. The police arrested her because they said she was breaking the law by being in public with her breasts uncovered.
But in the early 80's the New York Court Of Appeals ruled that such laws were unconstitutional, and that women had the right to be bare-breasted in public, just as men are allowed to. The Manhattan D.A.'s office refused to prosecute the woman.
But that wasn't the end of it. She sued the city for the illegal arrest, and was awarded $ 25,000.
I Agree!Most women choose not to be bare breasted in public,because it is simply too dangerous.In my opinion,it would be an invitation to rape for many men.Breasts are very sensuous.I am 38C;and,am using HRT to increase to D or DD.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Diego County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News DA Files Charges in Multi-Million-Dollar Invest... (Mar '15) Sep 12 Unfortunate old C... 18
News CBP Arrest 19 Fugitives Labor Day Weekend Sep 7 anotherview2 1
News More than a month later, few answers in Nationa... Aug '17 El Veijo 1
News Humans in America 100,000 years earlier than pr... Jul '17 pshun2404 26
News Woman seen taking package still at large Jun '17 Some of us need m... 1
News Woman says Kaiser doctor sexually assaulted her Jun '17 Ison 1
News Keep CBS 8 on Cox Cable (Dec '16) Apr '17 Irritated 171
More from around the web