Ohio woman claims she was fired for Obama vote

Feb 20, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: WBIR-TV Knoxville

A southwest Ohio woman says she was fired three days after the November election because she voted for President Barack Obama.

Comments
21 - 40 of 220 Comments Last updated Mar 10, 2013
eggrol4sell

Hanoi, Vietnam

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#32
Feb 20, 2013
 
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
Uh oh, a demorat response to the story of the woman voting six times for obama.......film at eleven. LMAO
March 1st, how many________ in $89B chop?! just blame on mr. Prezident;)
eggrol4sell

Hanoi, Vietnam

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#34
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct
Many non gays want the same rights as married people with out getting married
Most anti gay marriage people are not against gays they just don't want the word marriage changed
There was more than enough support for this to pass years ago but gays chose to change the word marriage instead of go for equal right
Now with the assault on marriage I don't think they could even get a national civil union
hey amigo! here is One what on yo mind!! One grande beef taco?!!;-00
Dirk

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#36
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Well they did her a favor, now she can reap the benefits of Obamacare and welfare, she'll actually
be better off financially.
eggrol4sell

Hanoi, Vietnam

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually we are having thinly sliced raw yellow fin tuna with cold brown rice, and raw vegetables in a garlic ginger salad dressing with crunchy fried fins crumbled on top
A fruit salad with local fresh goat yogurt
And pineapple tamales for d
sound Dlisseat;)~! don't thinking2muchacho ok...and don't skeep yo dinnner!! ;)
Robert

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#38
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you must have no problem with the anti-gays who claim they were fired because they voted against marraige equality.....
The company who fired her has an official policy against discriminating against against gay people and several others but it says nothing about not discriminating against obama voters.

They had to do lay offs and well her name came up.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Who wrote:
<quoted text>
If they did that there would be no more benefits and the gays wouldn't want to get married.
That's really all this is about, that's all the gays want is the benefits.
Right, I guess that explains why we've been getting married by our churches and having other committment ceremonies for decades even though we got ZERO benefits.

I wonder how many heteros wouldn't get married if it weren't for all the benefits? As it is the average hetero guy has to be drug to the altar.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#40
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Gays are free to marry anyone of the opposite sex that is of age they want..........
And now we're also free to marry anyone of the same sex who is of age as well!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#41
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not true for all gays or the majority would have fought for equal rights under a gay civil union
Many like me would vote for that but will fight gay marriage
Equal rights under a civil union would be a national law by now
I guess that's explains why the anti-gays voted to ban civil unions as well as marriage in many states......

We tried to get ANY rights through civil unions & domestic partnerships & many other names for the past 20+ years, but you anti-gays fought us every step of the way.

So now we'll have marriage equality, and you only have yourselves to blame.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Far Away wrote:
<quoted text>
Have a civil contract and be done with it.
Again, we tried that for 20+ years and your fellow anti-gays fought us EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

Maybe if you all hadn't been so hateful & vindictive all those years you wouldn't be stuck dealing with same-sex couples getting married.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct
Many non gays want the same rights as married people with out getting married
Most anti gay marriage people are not against gays they just don't want the word marriage changed
There was more than enough support for this to pass years ago but gays chose to change the word marriage instead of go for equal right
Now with the assault on marriage I don't think they could even get a national civil union
Feel free to have a civil union; no one is stopping you. I'll keep my marriage and keep fighting until it is recognized by all the states and the federal govt.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
More proof that you are not after the benefits but just want to change the meaning of the word marriage
But according to your fellow anti-gays we're supposedly only after the benefits.

What a conundrum!

Maybe you all need to huddle up and figure out what it is we're really up to.......

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct
Your assault in marriage pissed people off and put your cause back by decades
Marriage wasn't even on the radar for most gay couples even a decade ago.

Most of us would have gladly settled for civil unions, but you anti-gays had to fight every step of the way.

Oh well, all water under the bridge now.

I guess we'll just keep getting married......

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
10 years ago a civil union would have passed nation wide
Today it not
And yet you anti-gays consistently voted against civil unions 10 years ago.

Hmmmmm, now that doesn't match your lies once again.

Oh well, we'll just have to get married instead.
Who

Wyoming, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not true for all gays or the majority would have fought for equal rights under a gay civil union
Many like me would vote for that but will fight gay marriage
Equal rights under a civil union would be a national law by now
That's odd because every gay liberal I've had the displeasure of arguing with did nothing but quote the divorce rates of married couples, if marriage is as awful as gays argue it is then why do they want to get married at all?

A: Because of the benefits. Period.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Feb 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Eleanor wrote:
Voting is a private matter.
If she is going around blabbing about her vote, there are bound to be people who don't agree with her.
Since most jobs are 'at will' positions, an employer can fire a person for ANY reason or NO REASON.
Since she already KNEW the position of the company's President, it was stupid of her to open her mouth.
She's guilty of being not to bright ...
She should not have been fired for exercising her Constitutional Right to vote. Lawsuit.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all I have no fellows
Second of all I have said for 20 years gays are more interested in altering the meaning of the word marriage than benefits
And just like your fellow anti-gays, you're wrong on both accounts.

All we've ever wanted is equal treatment under the law.

Since you wouldn't accept that in the form of civil unions or domestic partnerships, now we'll have it in the form of marriage.

The choice was yours. If you're opposed to gays marrying, then you choose poorly.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes gay marriage was talked about in the 80s
In 2000 more than a decade ago gay marriage was being heavily debated
Only by a few "radicals". The overwhelming majority of same-sex couples would have GLADLY settled for civil unions or some basic recognition & protection for our relationships.

Too bad you couldn't convince enough of your fellow anti-gays to support civil unions. You could have easily prevented any marriages from ever happening.

Oh well, sucks to be you.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Feb 20, 2013
 
Who wrote:
<quoted text>
That's odd because every gay liberal I've had the displeasure of arguing with did nothing but quote the divorce rates of married couples, if marriage is as awful as gays argue it is then why do they want to get married at all?
A: Because of the benefits. Period.
That's just our way of pointing out that HETERO marriage is awful (just ask any married straight guy), while our marriages are fabulous by comparison!

We want the legal protections which only marriage can provide; the benefits are just icing on the wedding cake.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again
I have always been pro equal rights and was very vocal about equal benefits for any couple
Then your beef is with all those anti-gays who wouldn't even support civil unions when we were BEGGING for them.

I suggest you take it up with them.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Feb 20, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure some do
But the majority just can't stand the fact that we have something they don't
Just like all liberals want more taxes on everyone that has more money than them
Even though plastic swimming pools kill more kids in a month than assault weapons do in a year the liberals go after assault weapons
Because they can't stand me having something they don't have are are scared to own
You have a 50% divorce rate; we certainly don't want that.
You have an overwhelming majority of husbands who are miserable in a marriage they never wanted in the first place; we certainly don't want that.
You have every man married to someone they have absolutely nothing in common with; we certainly don't want that.
You have an overwhelming majority of men who'd rather spend every minute of their day in the company of other men doing manly things rather than be around a nagging woman; now THAT we actually DO want!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Montgomery County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ohio woman castrates man after offer of $13 for... Aug 12 The Duke of Hazard 1
Ohio Woman Accused Of Stealing, Selling Guide Dog Jul '14 Jenny 1
Teen found guilty in bus stop shooting Jul '14 Net Nut 2
New program aims to get kids reading over summer Jun '14 The Duke Of Hazard 2
Dayton man charged with physical and sexual ass... Apr '14 The Hack Checker 1
Few dogs labled as dangerous despite new law Mar '14 Gun Nut 1
Trotwood apartments to get $4 million in upgrades (Jan '14) Jan '14 Just Me 2
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Montgomery County People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••