Ohio woman claims she was fired for Obama vote

Feb 20, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: WBIR-TV Knoxville

A southwest Ohio woman says she was fired three days after the November election because she voted for President Barack Obama.

Comments (Page 11)

Showing posts 201 - 220 of220
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#298
Mar 8, 2013
 
I can do this forever because you're never going to win, while we keep racking up victory after victory.

I have all the time in the world.......
US Huh

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#299
Mar 8, 2013
 
That's nothing, there are 800,000 federal employees being furloughed and 20,000 are getting laid off because 62 million people voted for Obama.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#305
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
No it did not liar..........The court banned it.......
Nope, the MN Supreme Court ruled the the LAW as written banned same-sex couples from marrying.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#306
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again my little troll.........LOL
1971 marriage was banned by the court..........ROTFLMAO
Why do you keep making my point for me???
Then why were they denied a marriage license in 1969 if wasn't banned by the court until 1971?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#307
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Many conservatives support equal rights under a different names.
Many liberals are against perverting the word marriage..........LOL
And yet we keep passing more & more marriage equality laws.....

Remind us again how many bans you've passed in the past 6 month?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#308
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Are ya really that slow????
The court banned it..........ROTFLMAO
If there was a law prohibiting why cant you post the letter of law???
Besides the fact you are just a lying troll???
I already have posted it multiple times.

It's Minn.St.c517

The law banned same-sex couples from marrying.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#309
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The liar now claims she will live forever..........ROTFLMAO
30 years wasted and another 30 to go..........
Hardly wasted, but even if it was, that's our choice.

I'll have full federal rights within 6 months; no need to wait any longer than that.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#313
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Caught in another lie..........LOL
No where in that law does it mention SSM..........But thanks for making my point......
And yet the Supreme Court said it banned them from marrying.

Again, take it up with the court.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#315
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again my lying troll..........ROTFLMAO
So tell us why you cant post the letter of the law that said that????
Besides the fact you are nothing but a lying troll???
I've posted the law numerous times.

Minn.St.c517

Feel free to read it.

The court ruled it banned same-sex couples from marrying. If you have a problem with that, take it up with them.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#317
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Read more than 10 years ago.......And it does not mention SSM..........ROTFLMAO
But thanks for making my point again.........
Maybe that's because their is no such thing as "same-sex marriage"?

Regardless of what the text said, it banned same-sex couples from getting married, which is why they were denied a marriage license.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#319
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
The law never mentioned perverts at all........
The law did not mention gays
If you had read it you would know that.........It was the SC that ruled SSM was illegal after flamers tried to pervert the word marriage.
And yet they used the text of the law to deny the couple a marriage license. Gee now why would they do that if the law didn't ban same-sex couples from marrying?

And yet the court ruled the text of the law as written banned same-sex couples from marrying. Gee now why did they do that if the law didn't ban same-sex couples from marrying?

A law doesn't have to specifically mention 14 year olds in order to ban them from voting.

A law doesn't have to specifically mention cows in order to ban them from voting.

A law doesn't have to specifically mention dead people in order to ban them from driving.

And a law doesn't have to spefically mention gay people in order to ban them from marrying.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#321
Mar 8, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again liar..........That is not what they ruled.........
Why are you too scared to post what they said???
besides the fact it will prove you wrong and me right?????
30 years waiting and another 30 to go..........ROTFLMAO
Aaah, but that IS what they said.

"We hold therefore that Minn.St.c517 does not authorize marriage between persons ofthe same sex and that such marriages are accordingly prohibited."

So even though the law doesn't specifically mention same-sex couples, it STILL prohibited them from marrying, which is why the court upheld them being denied a marriage license.

6 months max before federal benefits; 8 years max for marriage in all 50 states.

I can wait.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#323
Mar 9, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again you make my point.......LOL
No law said SSM was illegal
Then perverts tried to pervert the word marriage and now we have laws against
Thanks again
If there were no laws against same-sex couples marrying, then there would have been married same-sex couples.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#325
Mar 9, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you really that stupid???
You posted the law
Nothing against SSM until the SC had to rule against two perverts
And yet they still used those very same laws you keep claiming never existed to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Gee, now how can that be? If there were no laws banning same-sex couples from marrying as you keep claiming, then they'd have been able to marry.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#327
Mar 9, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Now law banned SSM until perverts tried to pervert the word marriage
Thanks again for making my case
And yet they still used those very same laws you keep claiming never existed to deny same-sex couples marriage licenses.

If they weren't basing their decision to deny a marriage license to same-sex couples on the law at the time, what were they using? A coin flip??

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#330
Mar 9, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes the court ruled against perverts trying to pervert the word ma
rriage
That is what I have been telling you
Thanks for proving me right again
Nope, they were denied a marriage license BEFORE the court made their ruling.

"BEFORE" (that's the important part)

So WHY were they denied a marriage license if it wasn't against the law for them to get married and the court hadn't made any ruling yet?

If there was no law banning them from getting married, they would have been allowed to marry and there never would have been a court case.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#332
Mar 10, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes they tried to pervert the word marriage..........
Before that no law exists that banned SSM
If no law existed which banned them from marrying, then they would have been issued a marriage license.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#334
Mar 10, 2013
 
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again
The man behind the counter told them no..........ROTFLMAO
Tell us why you can't post the letter of the law that backs up your lie???
And WHY did the man behind the counter tell them no?

I've posted it numerous times- Minn.St.c517
TakeCare1

Rochester, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#336
Mar 10, 2013
 
Ohio woman claims she was fired for Obama vote?

GOOD!!!

anyone who voted for That Obama Joke should be fired
TakeCare1

Rochester, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#337
Mar 10, 2013
 
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
If no law existed which banned them from marrying, then they would have been issued a marriage license.
No Phaggot should be allowed to marry. "PERIOD"

all gays should be banned from owning a business also!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 201 - 220 of220
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••