Sheriff's deputy charged with stealin...

Sheriff's deputy charged with stealing signs

There are 4 comments on the Baltimore Examiner story from Sep 13, 2006, titled Sheriff's deputy charged with stealing signs. In it, Baltimore Examiner reports that:

Howard County Sheriff Chuck Cave's chief deputy has been charged with stealing Cave's challenger's campaign signs, according to Howard County police.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Baltimore Examiner.


Lorton, VA

#1 Sep 13, 2006
I know Sheriff Chuck Cave personally, and have talked with Scott Mergenthaler several times. I have a high opinion of both, and certainly hope that there is some misunderstanding here; I just can't imagine what it could be.

Certainly if Mr. Mergenthaler did what is charged, Mr. Cave seems to have little recourse but to dismiss him ... and that would be a true pity, indeed; they are good men.

San Jose, CA

#2 Sep 20, 2006
The Chief Deputy did not "steal" any signs. He removed signs that were posted illegally on county right-of-way and immediately drove to the county roads office where he turned them in.

Ellicott City, MD

#3 Nov 11, 2006
Linda wrote:
The Chief Deputy did not "steal" any signs. He removed signs that were posted illegally on county right-of-way and immediately drove to the county roads office where he turned them in.
Major R. Scott Mergenthaler certainly did remove signs belonging to his boss Chuck Cave's opponent and isn't it interesting that he only removed Fitzgerald's. He didn't remove any signs belonging to any other candidate. I guess all other campaign signs in Howard County were posted legally. Come on!!! Who makes him the illegal sign remover for Howard County and how did he determine the "right of way." He was also accompanied by Chuck Cave's campaign manager, Mimi Mathews, in the middle of the day. Also, when Jim Fitzgerald's own wife caught Major Mergenthaler taking down the signs, she asked for them back and he wouldn't. I think that is where the "THEFT" occurred. If the owner or representative wants their signs back, he was obligated to give them back at that point. Also the nonsense about him "immediately" taking them to the county roads shop did NOT occur. Jim Fitzgerald's wife followed them from the intersection of MD route 175 and MD route 108 to the intersection of MD route 32 and MD route 144. That's not the quickest way to turn them in. Let the court decide, it will be interesting.
I Agree with Charlie

Baltimore, MD

#4 Mar 3, 2008
I agree with Charlie on the intent of Theft in this case. Why is he removing signs in the first place ? The police and county roadways personnel are the only ones authorized to remove signs from the roadway.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Howard County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Within integrated schools, de facto segregation... (Mar '17) Mar '17 noobieR 1
News Illegal Immigration Advocates Trying to Make Ma... (Feb '17) Mar '17 kyman 5
News Immigration debate moves to Howard County as po... (Jan '17) Jan '17 tomin cali 1
Howard County Arrest Records and Criminal Mugshots (Oct '16) Oct '16 Jim 2
News Chambersburg man finds grave of ancestor, a Civ... (Apr '08) Sep '16 Flesticle5Squubny 17
Bookbags in school (Sep '16) Sep '16 DeanT 1
News Columbia teen, sentenced in 2008 for shooting S... (Aug '10) Dec '15 His BFF 4
More from around the web