crooks - ty kaufman - steve hilgers -...

crooks - ty kaufman - steve hilgers - carl b. anderson jr

Posted in the Harvey County Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
CRAIG GILBERT

Salt Lake City, UT

#1 Oct 19, 2008
ASK STEVE HILGERS CARL B. ANDERSON JR AND TY KAUFMAN IF THEY ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED ME IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a) THEY DID!

McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-174 - DISTRICT COOURT JUDGE CARL B. ANDERSON JR. AND A SHERIFF DEPUTY ISSUED A WARRANT FOR CRAIG I. GILBERT CHARGING MR. GILBERT WITH THEFT ---
MR. ANDERSON WHOM ISSUED THE WARRANT BY KANSAS LAW WAS PROHIBITED FROM HOLDING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING BASED ON HIS PREVIOUS PROBALBLE CAUSE FINDING - WHEN HE ISSUED THE WARRANT.
DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TY KAUFFMAN MCPHERSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAS ORDER3ED BY THE JUDGE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO CHARGE THEFT BY DECEPTION......TY KAUFMAN DECLINED -= HE SAID THE COMPLAINT WAS JUST FINE ....... MEANING HE HAD BEEN ORDERED TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE AND THE JUDGE HAD VIOLATED THE LAW AND HE WAS NOT GETTING ENVOLVED .
STEVE HILGERS MY ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE COURT CAME TO ME AND OFFERED ME A PLEA AGREEMENT AFTER SPENDING NEARLY 2 YEARS IN JAIL ALREADY AND SAID PLEA TO THE CHARGES IT WILL RUN CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AND YOU WILL BE RELEASED - WHAT DID I HAVE TO LOSE I KNEW I HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG AND KNEW THIS MATTER WOULD CONTINUE UPON MY RELEASE...
I PLEAD NO-CONTEST ON MY ATTORNIES PROMISE I WOULD BE RELEASED FROM CUSTUDY OR I WOULD NOT HAVE PLEAD GUILTY I WOULD HAVE WENT TO TRIAL AS I WAS NO-LONGER IN SOLITARY CONFINEMT.
AT SENTENCING THE COURT SAID THIS CASE RUNS CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 YOUR TIME STARTS TODAY........
THREE DAYS LATER AS I WAS PREPAIRING MY OWN DOCUMNENTS TO W/DRAW MY PLEA MY ATTORNEY (what the fuck ever) CAME TO VISIT ME AT THE McPHERASON COUNTY JAIL - HE SAT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF A GLSS AND SPECIFICALLY STATED IM OVER HERE BECAUSE I KNOW YOUR MAD ----- HE TOLD MEE CRAIG I. GILBERT THAT HE WAS SORRY (YOU ARE A SORRY PIECE OF SHIT STEVE HILGERS) AND THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW MY PLEA .
FOR INTENT ANDD PURPOSE A MOYTION TO W/DRAW A PLEA MUST BE FILED WITHIN 10 DAYS ......... HE ACTED REAL SINCERE..........I NEVER HEARD FROM THE FUCKING MAGGOT AGAIN!
THOUGH MR. HILLGERS WAS APPOINTED AS THE MCPHERSON COUNTY MAJISTRATE JUDGE DIRECTLY FOLLOWING THIS INCIDENT.
THIS CONVICTION IN McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS VIOLATES 18 USC 1581(a)......... I FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS STATING THIS FACT IT WENT THROUGH FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.........
THE KANSAS ATOTRNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE OFFICE FILED CONTINUANCES FOR TWO YEARS ON A SIMPLE THEFT CHARGE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TO BE ANSWERED W/IN 45 - DAYS ........PHIL KLINE VIOLATED 18 USC 1581(b) HE AND OR HIS AGENTS OBSTRUCTWED ENFORCMENT OF FEDERAL LAWS WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED BY CRAIG I. GILBERT --- RATHER THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED IN THE COURT HOUSE BY HIS COLLEAGUES.
PHIL KLINES ACTIVITIES ARE LISTED W/IN THIS BLOG SITE -- READ ON.
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#2 Nov 7, 2008
Thank you for submitting your online complaint. Please remember to mail or
fax copies of ALL documents relevant to this complaint to the Kansas Attorney General's Consumer Protection Office, 120 S.W. 10th Avenue, 4th
Floor, Topeka, KS 66612 with a letter stating your name, address and
phone number and indicating that you have previously submitted your
complaint online. Relevant documents may include advertising material,
contracts, warranty information, receipts, letters, checks (front and
back), photographs, bills and invoices, etc. FAILURE TO PROVIDE ALL
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS MAY CAUSE UNNECESSARY DELAY IN THE HANDLING OF YOUR COMPLAINT.
THESE ARE THE ISSUES ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY, KANSAS - IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a).........PRETRIAL DETAINEE NOT ON PROBATION OR PAROLE HELD IN SOLITARY CONFINMENT FOR 17 MONTHS W/NO OUT OF CELL RECREATION , NO, T.V., NO RADIO, no other Inmate communication.
JOE SCHEAPACK FURTHER FILED A DOCUMENT IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 TO PROHIBIT MR. GILBERTY FROM FILING LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN ANY OTHER COURT OTHER THAT ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT.
DID YOU HEAR ME - I SAID THAT JOE SCHEPACK A DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN THE STATE OF KANSAS FILED A SIGNED DOCUMENT IN A COURT OF LAW TO PROHIBIT CRAIG I. GILBERT FROM FILING IN ANY COURT OTHER THAN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT....IT APPEARS HE WAS WELL AWARE WHAT HE WAS DOING WAS ILLEGAL, AND WANTED TO CONSEAL HIS ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES.
ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF TRACY PLOUTZ FURTHER FILED A LEGAL DOCUMENT IN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT OR HIS AGENT SEEKING A SEARCH WARRANT FOR MR. GILBERTS CELL ...HE DETAILED HIS OPENING OF MR. GILBERTS MAIL ( ARNOLD KRATKY WILSON KANSAS FAMILY FRIEND COME TO MR. GILBERT AS HE WAS A TRUSTEE AND INFORMED MR. GILBERT THAT BILL SYLERS DEPUTY SHERIFF) HAD JUST ENTERED THE LIBRARY WITH A POT OF BOILNG WATER AND MR. GILBERTS LEGAL MAIL AND COVERED THE GLASS THOUGH LEFT A SMALL OPENING WERE MR. KRATKY WITNESSED BILL SYLERS STEAM OPEN MR. GILBERT'S LEGAL DOCUMENTS.
FBI INFORMED 2004..........
THESE INDIVIDUALS WERE UPSET CAUSE MR. GILBERT HAD SENT A LAWS SUIT TO 52 ELLSWORTH COUNTY RESIDENTS CLAIMING THEY HAD FAILED TO PROPERLY OVER SEE ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES AND CLAIMING TO BE FALSLEY IMPRISONED!
DURING MR. GILBERT'S PRELIMINARY HEARIMG MR. GILBERT PUT 13 WITNESS ON THE STAND WHICH HE MR. GILBERT SUPEONED.....MR. GILBERT PROVED EVERY PARAGRAPH OF A THREE PAGE POLICE REPORT WAS A LIE!
THEN ELLSWORTH COUNTY OFFICIALS CHANGED THE TRANSCRIPTS.........MADE IT LOOK LIKE MR. GILBERT DID NOT KNOW WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT - WE ARE SPECIFICALLY SPEAKING ABOUT CASE 99-CR-113.
I JUST GAVE YOU THE BREIF ISSUES REGARDING ELLSWORTH COUNTY THE REST IS FOUND W/IN THIS BLOG - THE FEDERAL COURT ORDER ORDERING JOE SCHEPACK THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DSTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTED DOES NOT COME TILL 2003..... UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT KANSAS CITY, KANSAS -
Craig T. Gilbert vs. state of Kansas et al. This case is remanded to state court...-->ffast stop-->
MY MIDDLE INITIAL IS NOT T.----- BUT IT IS RECORDED IN THE CLERKS OFFICE ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE AS T.........THE COURT ORDER ORDERS THE ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PROSECUTED - IF ANY-ONE HAS A COPY OF THE COURT ORDER / OR ANY OTHER COURT ORDERS --- PLEASE FEEL FREE TO E-MAIL THEM TO ME, OR POST THEM HERE AS A COMMENT. [email protected].
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#3 Nov 7, 2008
THIS IS THE BIG ISSUE ------ I'VE BEEN ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED IN KANSAS 4-TIMES.........SEE::::::OFFIC IAL KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WEB SITE EACH AND EVERY CONVICTION IS ILLEGAL.........AND FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES ARE WELL AWARE AND HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO CONCEAL THIS JUDICIAL CONSPIRACY FROM THE PUBLIC - WHICH HAS A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON MR. GILBERTS ECONOMCIAL PURSUIT - MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUIERED BY LAW. AS MR GILBERTS CONVICTIONS REMAIN ON HIS CRIMINAL RECORD AND UNTILL A COURT OF LAW MAKES A WRITTEN JUDICIAL FINDING AS REQUIERED BY LAW --- WHICH HAS NEVER ACCURED IN OVER 20 FILINGS- IN STATE OR FEDERAL COURTS.......AND AS A DIRECT RESULT MR. GILBERT IS PROHIBITED FROM RECEIVING COMPENSATION FOR OVER 5 + YEARS ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED...
COURT RECORDS CLEARLY SHOW THE CONSPIRACY BY THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM......AND GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WHOM ARE PAID BY THE US CITIZENS TO RESOLVE THESE MATTERS........
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#4 Nov 7, 2008
JOE SCHEPACK KANSAS DISTRICT ATTORNEY YOU SHOULD RESIGN TODAY - IF YOU HAVE NOT NOTICED THERE IS A STORM HEADING YOUR WAY..........AND ONE YOU HIGHLY DESERVE!

KIDNAPPING IS A CRIME JOE SCHEPACK REMEBER JULY 2003...YOU KIDNAPPED ME!!!!!!!!!!

ANYONE HAVE ANY SUJESTIONS FOR JOE SCHEPACK, HERE IS HIS E-MAIL ADDRESS: [email protected]

ALL THE IDIOTS ENVOLVED:

TRACY PLOUTZ ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF!

BARRY A. BENNINGTON JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS

MIKE KELLEY JUDGE ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS

DALE URBANEK MAJISTRATE JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS

KENT ROTH ATTORNEY AT LAW ELLINWOOD KANSAS

CARL B ANDERSON JR. DISTRICT JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS

TY KAUFMAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY MCPHERSON KANSAS

STEVE HILGERS MAJISTRATE JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS

LEIGH HOOD DISTRICT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS

DANIEL LOVE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS

MARK COWELL ATTORNEY AT LAW GREAT BEND KANSAS

SAM CROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

DISTRICT JUDGE RENO COUNTY KANSAS

PHIL KLINE -JOHNSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY (EX-KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL)

CARLA J. STOVALL - EX KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO READ A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT!

AND SEVERAL OTHERS I'LL GET BACK TOO:

725 PEOPLE HAVE READ THIS BLOG.......... WONDER WHO THEY ARE --- [email protected] [email protected]

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#5 Nov 7, 2008
I WAS IMPRISONED FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT IN 3 KANSAS COUNTIES :::::
FORD COUNTY KANSAS 95-CR-501
MCPHERSON COUNTY, KANSAS 99-CR174
ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS 99-CR113
SPENT 5 YEARS ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED AND THEN SENT TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ILLEGALLY AND IMPRISONED AN ADDITIONAL 3 MONTHS .......... THEN ARRESTED AND HELD ILLEGALLY ON A KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS WARRANT CLAIMING I WAS A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE......WHEN IN FACT I WAS KIDNAPPED BY CALIFORNIA AND TRANSPORTED OVER INTERSTATE HIGWAYS.
(FEDERAL JURISDICTION)
RELEASED FROM CUSTODY AFTER FILING IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT (THE FEDERAL COURT DID NOT ISSUE ME A CASE ) THOUGH A COPY OF MY COMPLAINT CAN BE FOUND IN THE SAN BERNADINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ..........STAMPED BY THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT!
CASE WAS DISMISSED AND SEVERAL MONTHS LATER - I MEET A HOMELESS PERSON - WHOM ONE DAY SAID " WE KNOW ALL ABOUT THOSE FEDERAL DOCUMENTS IN KANSAS!" AND THEN I'M PUT ON THE GOVENORS LIER JET AND FLOWN BACK TO KANSAS.....W/OUT ANYONE SAYING ONE DAMN WORD TO ME!
AND I MIGHT ADD IT WAS AN ILLEGAL EXTRADITION VIOLATING 18 USC 1581(a) WHOMEVER RETURNS SOMEONE TO A CONDITION OF PEONAGE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO KNOW MORE THAN 20 YEARS IN PRISON!
I SENT GOVENOR SEBELLIUS A LETTER IN 2004 WHILE BEING ILLEGALLY DETAINED IN CALIFORNIA ON SAID PAROLE HOLD VIOLATION.THRU HER HUSBAND GARY SEBELLIUS UNITED STATES MAJISTRATE JUDGE ..........I FIGURED THEY COULD DISCUSS IT OVER COFFEE.......THEY DISCUSSED IT ALL RIGHT..........
I'VE BEEN PAYING FOR IT EVERY SINCE,
..TR> ..TR> WHERE IS MY MANDATORY RESTITUTION AS REQUIERD BY LAW----GOVENOR SEBELLIUS!
A BREACH OF CONTRACT ARISING DURING THE COURSE OF ROUTINE BUSINESS ......IS NOT A CRIME IT'S A CIVIL MATTER..........
IN THIS CASE A CIVIL MATTER NOW TURNED CRIMINAL --- AND THE STATE OF KANSAS REPRESENTITIVES ARE THE CRIMINALS!
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access
[wais.access.gpo.gov]
[CITE: 18 USC 1593]
TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I--CRIMES
CHAPTER 77--PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
Sec. 1593. Mandatory restitution
(a) Notwithstanding section 3663 or 3663A, and in addition to any
other civil or criminal penalties authorized by law, the court shall
order restitution for any offense under this chapter.
(b)(1) The order of restitution under this section shall direct the
defendant to pay the victim (through the appropriate court mechanism)
the full amount of the victim's losses, as determined by the court under
paragraph (3) of this subsection.
(2) An order of restitution under this section shall be issued and
enforced in accordance with section 3664 in the same manner as an order
under section 3663A.
(3) As used in this subsection, the term ....full amount of the
victim's losses'' has the same meaning as provided in section 2259(b)(3)
and shall in addition include the greater of the gross income or value
to the defendant of the victim's services or labor or the value of the
victim's labor as guaranteed under the minimum wage and overtime
guarantees of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.).
(c) As used in this section, the term ....victim'' means the
individual harmed as a result of a crime under this chapter, including,
in the case of a victim who is under 18 years of age, incompetent,
incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the victim or a
representative of the victim's estate, or another family member, or any
other person appointed as suitable by the court, but in no event shall
the defendant be named such representative or guardian.

THE CRIME::::::::::
Thirteenth Amendment--Slavery and Involuntary Servitude
Bailey v. Alabama,..
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#6 Nov 7, 2008
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

ON JANUARY 16, 2008 I FILED A DOCUMENT ENTITLED EX PARTY CRAIG I. GILBERT

EXPEDITED PETITON TO MODIFY CHILD SUPPORT

WITH THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE I HAVE A RECEIPT FROM MR. LEAVITTS LEGAL COUNSEL.

NEVER RECIEVED A EXPEDITED HEARING NOR A RESPONSE IN WRITTING DID I MR. LEAVITT.......

FOR ALL YOU WHOM READ THIS, I'M CLEARLY SHOWING YOU THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND LAW'S OF THIS COUNTRY ARE NULL AND VOID....UNENFORCABLE IN ANY COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.......

I CLEARLY IN PLAIN ENGLISH IMFORMED SAID UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES - OF THE LAWS AND BASIS FOR MY COMPLAINT!

1...FALSLEY IMPRISONED IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a)

2. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES ILEGALLY SEIZED BY THE STATE OF KANSAS.

3 DEPRIVED OF HEARING ON THIRD PARTY COUNTER CLAIM IN SALINE COUTY KANSAS - DISTRICT COURT PETITION CAPTIONED

STATE OF KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND REHABILITATION SERVICES ON BEHALF OF MONA EVELIGH AND MINOR CHILD SKYLER B. GILBERT.

VS.

CRAIG IVAN GILBERT

VS

THE STATE OF KANSAS ET AL.



LET ME EXPLAIN I WAS ARRESTED IN SALINE COUTY KANSAS AND HELD ON A CASH $5,000.00 DOLLAR BOND FOR NON-SUPPORT OF A CHILD.

I SIMPLY FILED A THIRD PARTY COUNTER CLAIM AS I HAD BEEN ILLEGASLLY INCARCERATED IN 4 SEPERATE COUNTIES - STATED ALL THE VERIFIABLE FACT'S AND WHEN I WENT TO COURT - LESS THAN 3 MINUTES OF OPENING MY MOUTH.THE JUDGE SAID TO SHERIFF PERSONEL GET THIS MAN OUT OF MY COURT ROOM!

FOR FULL INTENT AND PURPOSE I NEVER HAD ANOTHER COURT HEARING AND NEVER RECIEVED A HEARING ON MY PETITION!

THAT IS, I WAS RELEASED FROM CUSTODY ON A $5000,00 DOLLAR CASH BOND - AND NEVER GIVEN ANOTHER COURT HEARING!

THOUGH THE STATE OF KANSAS TO THIS DAY GARNISHES MY PAY CHECKS AND STEALS MY FEDERAL INCOME TAXES.........HOW AND WHY - THEY THE STATE OF KANSAS FILED A COMPLAINT - I FILED A COMPLAINT AND WAS NEVER GIVEN A HEARING ON MY PETITION ------- THIS IS YOUR LEGAL SYSTEM WHOM CLAIMS TO CARE ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN.........

THIS IS THE UNITED STAED DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES WHOM CLAIMS TO CARE ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN..........IT'S SO EVIDENT WHEN ONE MAN CAN NOT GET A WRITTEN RESPONSE FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES ON A CLEARLY LEGIBLE LEGAL DOCUMENT AND THE COURTS WILL NOT GIVE THIS ONE MAN A HEARING ON CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS ------- WHEN A MINOR CHILD IS ENVOLVED, DO THEY REALY CARE ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN,,,,,,,I'M TRULY NOT ASKING I ALREADY KNOW THE TRUTH ---- THEY WISH TO COVER THIS UP..........IT'S CALLED A CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE A UNITED STATES CITIZEN SPECIFICALLY CRAIG I. GILBERT, OF HIS RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.

THERES MORE TO MY PETITION -- EXPLAINED TO MR. LEAVITT - THE WAIVER OF THE UNITED STATES TO BE SUED IN CHILD SUPPORT MATTERS...I CLEARLY IN PLAIN ENGLISH ENFORMED MR. LEAVITT OF ALL APPLICABLE LAW'S.

IT'S VERAFIABLE SEE THE DOCUMENT HAND DELIVERED TO HIS LEGAL COUNSEL IN WASHINGTON D.C. ON JANUARY 16, 2008.

THIS BLOG IS NOT SOME JOKE ------ I'VE INVESTED A LOT OF YEARS ON THIS AND DO NOT INTEND TO ALLOW IT TO GO AWAY WITH-OUT A BIG FAT CHECK...AND JOE SCHEPACKs RESIGNATION AND BAR LICENSE!
Craig Gilbert

Salt Lake City, UT

#7 Nov 7, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
STATE OF KANSAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
vs. No. 06-3120-SAC
CRAIG I. GILBERT, Defendant.
ORDER
Before the court is a notice of removal filed by a defendant in
a pending criminal action in the Ellsworth County District Court in
Ellsworth, Kansas.1 Gilbert appears to be facing prosecution in a
state criminal case (Saline County Case NO. 98-CR-1638), and cites
the revocation of his bond and his confinement for determination of

PAGE 2
his mental competency to stand trial. Gilbert broadly claims Kansas
officials, including state and appellate judges, have breached their
duty to protect his constitutional rights, and contends he is being
denied equal access to a fair and unbiased state tribunal.
The procedure for removal of a state criminal matter to a
federal court is controlled by 28 U.S.C. 1446 which provides in relevant part that
A defendant ... desiring to remove any ... criminal
prosecution from a State court shall file in the district
court of the United States for the district and division
within which such action is pending a notice of removal
signed pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure and containing a short and plain statement of
the grounds for removal, together with a copy of all
process, pleadings, and orders served upon such defendant
... in such action.
28 U.S.C. 1446(a).
The notice of removal must include all grounds for removal, and must be filed within 30 days of a defendant's arraignment in the state court, or any time before his trial, whichever is earlier.
28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(1)and (2). The filing of a notice of removal of a criminal prosecution does not prevent the state court from proceeding in the criminal action, but does prevent the state court from entering a judgment of conviction if the prosecution has not been remanded to the state courts. 28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(3).
This court is to promptly examine any notice of removal filed from a state criminal prosecution. 28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(4). Summary remand is to be ordered if it "clearly appears on the face of the notice and any exhibits annexed thereto that removal should not be
permitted." Id. Otherwise, a prompt evidentiary hearing is to be ordered and conducted to determine if removal is to be permitted.
28 U.S.C. 1446(c)(5).
Having reviewed the materials submitted by defendant Gilbert in this matter, the court finds summary remand of the criminal prosecution to the state courts is warranted.
Removal of state-court civil or criminal actions to federal court is limited to actions against federal officers, 28 U.S.C. 1442, members of the armed forces, 28 U.S.C. 1442a, and defendants in certain civil rights actions, 28 U.S.C. 1443. The court finds none of these requirements are satisfied by a plain and liberal reading of Gilbert's pro se notice of removal.
To the extent Gilbert seeks relief from the federal courts to prevent the violation of his constitutional rights in his pending state criminal proceeding, relief in federal court lies in a petition for a writ of habeas corpus after first exhausting available state court remedies. The summary remand entered herein reflects the court's considered opinion that removal to federal court is improper, that the state courts are fully capable of protecting Gilbert's constitutional rights.
IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED that defendant Gilbert
is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in seeking removal of
his state criminal proceeding to federal court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the state
courts.
CRAIG GILBERT

United States

#8 Nov 20, 2008
THE FEDERAL COURT ORDER HERE-IN - MENTIONS AN ELLSWORTH COUNTY DEFENDENT AND MENTIONS CRAIG GILBERT IS ON TRIAL IN SALINA KANSAS.

IT IS CALLED A GOVERNMENT PROSECUTION W/OUT THE PUBLIC WITNESSING IT..JOE SCHEPACK WAS ORDERED PROSECUTED IN THE STATE COURTS - IN JULY 2003 ---BY A FEDERAL JUDGE GT VANBEBBER A COPY OF THAT FEDERAL COURT ORDER IS FOUND IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT KANSAS CITY, KANSAS! GO SEE IT!

IF YOU WOULD LIKE THE FULL STORY E-MAIL ME I'LL SEND YOU A DIRECT LINK TO THE BLOG --- [email protected]

I'm going to bankrupt kansas if your public officials do not- right this matter instanter!
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT

Salt Lake City, UT

#9 May 21, 2009
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT

Salt Lake City, UT

#10 May 21, 2009
:



http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...

HIDE FROM THE LAW FILE THESE REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ONLY IN YOUR CRIMINAL CASE ------ I'M NOT AN ATTORNEY AND DO NOT CLAIM TO BE AN ATTORNEY SHOW THEM TO YOUR COUNSEL OF RECORD - FOR DETERMINATION IF YOUR ATTORNEY IS COMPETENT IN THE LAW..........
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...
CRAIG GILBERT wrote:
ASK STEVE HILGERS CARL B. ANDERSON JR AND TY KAUFMAN IF THEY ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED ME IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a) THEY DID!
McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-174 - DISTRICT COOURT JUDGE CARL B. ANDERSON JR. AND A SHERIFF DEPUTY ISSUED A WARRANT FOR CRAIG I. GILBERT CHARGING MR. GILBERT WITH THEFT ---
MR. ANDERSON WHOM ISSUED THE WARRANT BY KANSAS LAW WAS PROHIBITED FROM HOLDING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING BASED ON HIS PREVIOUS PROBALBLE CAUSE FINDING - WHEN HE ISSUED THE WARRANT.
DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TY KAUFFMAN MCPHERSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAS ORDER3ED BY THE JUDGE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO CHARGE THEFT BY DECEPTION......TY KAUFMAN DECLINED -= HE SAID THE COMPLAINT WAS JUST FINE ....... MEANING HE HAD BEEN ORDERED TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE AND THE JUDGE HAD VIOLATED THE LAW AND HE WAS NOT GETTING ENVOLVED .
STEVE HILGERS MY ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE COURT CAME TO ME AND OFFERED ME A PLEA AGREEMENT AFTER SPENDING NEARLY 2 YEARS IN JAIL ALREADY AND SAID PLEA TO THE CHARGES IT WILL RUN CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AND YOU WILL BE RELEASED - WHAT DID I HAVE TO LOSE I KNEW I HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG AND KNEW THIS MATTER WOULD CONTINUE UPON MY RELEASE...
I PLEAD NO-CONTEST ON MY ATTORNIES PROMISE I WOULD BE RELEASED FROM CUSTUDY OR I WOULD NOT HAVE PLEAD GUILTY I WOULD HAVE WENT TO TRIAL AS I WAS NO-LONGER IN SOLITARY CONFINEMT.
AT SENTENCING THE COURT SAID THIS CASE RUNS CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 YOUR TIME STARTS TODAY........
THREE DAYS LATER AS I WAS PREPAIRING MY OWN DOCUMNENTS TO W/DRAW MY PLEA MY ATTORNEY (what the fuck ever) CAME TO VISIT ME AT THE McPHERASON COUNTY JAIL - HE SAT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF A GLSS AND SPECIFICALLY STATED IM OVER HERE BECAUSE I KNOW YOUR MAD ----- HE TOLD MEE CRAIG I. GILBERT THAT HE WAS SORRY (YOU ARE A SORRY PIECE OF SHIT STEVE HILGERS) AND THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW MY PLEA .
FOR INTENT ANDD PURPOSE A MOYTION TO W/DRAW A PLEA MUST BE FILED WITHIN 10 DAYS ......... HE ACTED REAL SINCERE..........I NEVER HEARD FROM THE FUCKING MAGGOT AGAIN!
THOUGH MR. HILLGERS WAS APPOINTED AS THE MCPHERSON COUNTY MAJISTRATE JUDGE DIRECTLY FOLLOWING THIS INCIDENT.
THIS CONVICTION IN McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS VIOLATES 18 USC 1581(a)......... I FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS STATING THIS FACT IT WENT THROUGH FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.........
THE KANSAS ATOTRNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE OFFICE FILED CONTINUANCES FOR TWO YEARS ON A SIMPLE THEFT CHARGE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TO BE ANSWERED W/IN 45 - DAYS ........PHIL KLINE VIOLATED 18 USC 1581(b) HE AND OR HIS AGENTS OBSTRUCTWED ENFORCMENT OF FEDERAL LAWS WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED BY CRAIG I. GILBERT --- RATHER THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED IN THE COURT HOUSE BY HIS COLLEAGUES.
PHIL KLINES ACTIVITIES ARE LISTED W/IN THIS BLOG SITE -- READ ON.
Craig Gilbert

Jupiter, FL

#11 Feb 2, 2012
The STATE Making You Rely on a COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY - TO "ENFORCE YOUR RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMNET FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES"
NOTICE- THERE WAS A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY REPRESENTING ME - AT EVERY STAGE OF ALL THESE PROCEEDINGS.
FURTHER READ ARTICLE 1 SECTON 9 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
"THE PRIVILEGE OF THE WRIT OF HASBEAS CORPUS SHALL NOT BE SUSPENDED"
----------
Craig Ivan Gilbert, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Peter Heinebecker, MD; Tamera Neilson; Wayne Brown, MD; Richard Doe, MD; Jane Doe; and John Doe, Defendants and Appellees.
Case No. 20100063-CA
COURT OF APPEALS OF UTAH
2010 UT App 180; 2010 Utah App. LEXIS 174
July 1, 2010, Filed
NOTICE:
NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION
PRIOR HISTORY:[*1]
Fourth District, Provo Department, 090404327. The Honorable Claudia Laycock.
COUNSEL: Craig Ivan Gilbert, Provo, Appellant Pro se.
JUDGES: Before Judges Davis, McHugh, and Roth.
----------TO READ THE WHOLE COURT ORDER - GO TO THE NEXT POSTING
----------THE LIMIT THESE POSTING TO 4000 CHARACTHERS----------
OPINION
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIAM:
Craig Ivan Gilbert appeals the Fourth District Court's order dismissing his writ of habeas corpus based upon lack of jurisdiction. We affirm.
On August 28, 2009, Judge Judith S. Atherton of the Third District Court found that Gilbert was not competent to proceed to trial. Accordingly, the Third District Court ordered that Gilbert be placed in the Utah State Hospital in order to restore competency. On November 23, 2009, Gilbert filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Fourth District Court. After reviewing the petition, the Fourth District Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter due to the criminal case pending in the Third District Court.
In his petition, Gilbert sought several forms of relief, which related to the Third District Court's order finding Gilbert not competent to stand trial and placing him in the state hospital to restore competency, including a new competency hearing, a review of his current treatment at the hospital, and his immediate release from the [*2] hospital. First, these issues can be adequately raised in the Third District Court or in a direct appeal of that court's decisions. See Utah R. Civ. P. 65B(a)(stating that relief under the rule is only available where no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy is available); see also Carter v. Galetka, 2001 UT 96, P 6, 44 P.3d 626 (stating that a petition for habeas corpus is not a substitute for direct appellate review); Johnson v. State, 945 P.2d 673, 675 (Utah 1997)
-------("A habeas corpus action cannot be raised until other forms of relief, including direct appeal, have been exhausted, absent unusual circumstances.");
Gerrish v. Barnes, 844 P.2d 315, 319 (Utah 1992)("Habeas corpus is not to be used to circumvent regular appellate review.").
Second, in asserting such claims, Gilbert was asking the Fourth District Court to review the prior decisions of the Third District Court. Such review is not appropriate when relief is available in the committing court or in the appropriate appellate court. See Utah R. Civ. P. 65B(a); see also Flores v. Lodge, 101 Idaho 533, 617 P.2d 837, 840 (Idaho 1980)
(dismissing a petition for habeas corpus filed by a committed patient because claims were properly brought in [*3] the committing court).
In Flores v. Lodge, the Idaho Supreme Court applied these principles to the evaluation of a writ proceeding initiated by a petitioner confined to a mental health facility by a different court.
George

Marion, KS

#14 Mar 19, 2012
seems like your a criminal gilbert hmm hope serving time has helped you change your life
McPherson John Doe

Mcpherson, KS

#15 Jan 30, 2013
Craig

Contact me off forum @ [email protected] and I'll tell you how crooked Steve Hilgers is towards the end of 2012.

Thanks

McPherson John Doe
Masters USA Observes

San Diego, CA

#16 Mar 10, 2013
CRAIG GILBERT wrote:
ASK STEVE HILGERS CARL B. ANDERSON JR AND TY KAUFMAN IF THEY ILLEGALLY INCARCERATED ME IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC 1581(a) THEY DID!
McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-174 - DISTRICT COOURT JUDGE CARL B. ANDERSON JR. AND A SHERIFF DEPUTY ISSUED A WARRANT FOR CRAIG I. GILBERT CHARGING MR. GILBERT WITH THEFT ---
MR. ANDERSON WHOM ISSUED THE WARRANT BY KANSAS LAW WAS PROHIBITED FROM HOLDING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING BASED ON HIS PREVIOUS PROBALBLE CAUSE FINDING - WHEN HE ISSUED THE WARRANT.
DURING THE PRELIMINARY HEARING TY KAUFFMAN MCPHERSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAS ORDER3ED BY THE JUDGE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO CHARGE THEFT BY DECEPTION......TY KAUFMAN DECLINED -= HE SAID THE COMPLAINT WAS JUST FINE ....... MEANING HE HAD BEEN ORDERED TO PROSECUTE THIS CASE AND THE JUDGE HAD VIOLATED THE LAW AND HE WAS NOT GETTING ENVOLVED .
STEVE HILGERS MY ATTORNEY APPOINTED BY THE COURT CAME TO ME AND OFFERED ME A PLEA AGREEMENT AFTER SPENDING NEARLY 2 YEARS IN JAIL ALREADY AND SAID PLEA TO THE CHARGES IT WILL RUN CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT AND YOU WILL BE RELEASED - WHAT DID I HAVE TO LOSE I KNEW I HAD DONE NOTHING WRONG AND KNEW THIS MATTER WOULD CONTINUE UPON MY RELEASE...
I PLEAD NO-CONTEST ON MY ATTORNIES PROMISE I WOULD BE RELEASED FROM CUSTUDY OR I WOULD NOT HAVE PLEAD GUILTY I WOULD HAVE WENT TO TRIAL AS I WAS NO-LONGER IN SOLITARY CONFINEMT.
AT SENTENCING THE COURT SAID THIS CASE RUNS CONCURRENT W/ ELLSWORTH COUNTY DISTRICT COURT CASE 99-CR-113 YOUR TIME STARTS TODAY........
THREE DAYS LATER AS I WAS PREPAIRING MY OWN DOCUMNENTS TO W/DRAW MY PLEA MY ATTORNEY (what the fuck ever) CAME TO VISIT ME AT THE McPHERASON COUNTY JAIL - HE SAT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF A GLSS AND SPECIFICALLY STATED IM OVER HERE BECAUSE I KNOW YOUR MAD ----- HE TOLD MEE CRAIG I. GILBERT THAT HE WAS SORRY (YOU ARE A SORRY PIECE OF SHIT STEVE HILGERS) AND THAT HE WOULD WITHDRAW MY PLEA .
FOR INTENT ANDD PURPOSE A MOYTION TO W/DRAW A PLEA MUST BE FILED WITHIN 10 DAYS ......... HE ACTED REAL SINCERE..........I NEVER HEARD FROM THE FUCKING MAGGOT AGAIN!
THOUGH MR. HILLGERS WAS APPOINTED AS THE MCPHERSON COUNTY MAJISTRATE JUDGE DIRECTLY FOLLOWING THIS INCIDENT.
THIS CONVICTION IN McPHERSON COUNTY KANSAS VIOLATES 18 USC 1581(a)......... I FILED A PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS STATING THIS FACT IT WENT THROUGH FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.........
THE KANSAS ATOTRNEY GENERAL PHIL KLINE OFFICE FILED CONTINUANCES FOR TWO YEARS ON A SIMPLE THEFT CHARGE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS TO BE ANSWERED W/IN 45 - DAYS ........PHIL KLINE VIOLATED 18 USC 1581(b) HE AND OR HIS AGENTS OBSTRUCTWED ENFORCMENT OF FEDERAL LAWS WHEN ACTUALLY AWARE NO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED BY CRAIG I. GILBERT --- RATHER THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ACCURED IN THE COURT HOUSE BY HIS COLLEAGUES.
PHIL KLINES ACTIVITIES ARE LISTED W/IN THIS BLOG SITE -- READ ON.
EY , EY, good to see the dirt water Klan trash bumpkin named Carl B Anderson in the morgue, its no surprise to see the easy USA exposed scumbags and pedophiles directly employed through the county headed for more and more. Carl B Anderson nothing but a filthy two bit state fraud and direct state crime conceal. OINK OINK, good to see more pig swine in da hole.
Masters USA Observes

San Diego, CA

#17 Mar 10, 2013
ey broham, there all nothing but two bit scumbags and set up frauds, its good to see more of the scumbags and small fry skunks employed through those divisions USA exposed more and more. ALL THE IDIOTS ENVOLVED:

TRACY PLOUTZ ELLSWORTH COUNTY SHERIFF!

BARRY A. BENNINGTON JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS

MIKE KELLEY JUDGE ELLSWORTH COUNTY KANSAS

DALE URBANEK MAJISTRATE JUDGE ELLSWORTH KANSAS

KENT ROTH ATTORNEY AT LAW ELLINWOOD KANSAS

CARL B ANDERSON JR. DISTRICT JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS

TY KAUFMAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY MCPHERSON KANSAS

STEVE HILGERS MAJISTRATE JUDGE MCPHERSON KANSAS

LEIGH HOOD DISTRICT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS

DANIEL LOVE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FORD COUNTY KANSAS

MARK COWELL ATTORNEY AT LAW GREAT BEND KANSAS

SAM CROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

DISTRICT JUDGE RENO COUNTY KANSAS

PHIL KLINE -JOHNSON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY (EX-KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL)

CARLA J. STOVALL - EX KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL, OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO READ A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT!

AND SEVERAL OTHERS I'LL GET BACK TOO:
Masters USA Observes

San Diego, CA

#18 Mar 10, 2013
you hook one by its nuts, as you roll the rest on the expose, their nothing but skunks and slime.
Masters USA Observes

San Diego, CA

#19 Mar 10, 2013
new techs, higher technology directly rolls these bumpkins right on their nose, you drag the dirt water slime buckets up USA SUP POWER WAY and hook them on direct allegations of USA terrorist crimes, never fails.
Masters Perfection

San Diego, CA

#20 Mar 10, 2013
this fat little bumpkin hic chump named Anderson has a date with the Morgue diener, they need to plant it face down with its bumpkin Klan Trash A -HO up for the pickings.
Masters Perfection

San Diego, CA

#21 Mar 10, 2013
Good to see this cricket punk hic Andersons pie ho shut for keeps.
DC tech

Chicago, IL

#22 Jun 11, 2015
Masters USA Observes wrote:
new techs, higher technology directly rolls these bumpkins right on their nose, you drag the dirt water slime buckets up USA SUP POWER WAY and hook them on direct allegations of USA terrorist crimes, never fails.
IN FACT , get over to more direct county to state hides and conceals.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Harvey County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Officials: Shooting suspect had criminal record... (Feb '16) Feb '16 Cat74 43
News Marion police (Nov '10) Jun '15 DC tech 2
News Kansas Senate gives tentative OK to fracking waste (Feb '12) Feb '12 reseca joe 1
News Father releases video of 14-year-olds' fight (Jun '06) Sep '10 PAUL KERSEY 45
News Major burglary ring busted in Harvey Co. (Jan '10) Jan '10 connie 1
News Inmates work toward educations (Nov '09) Nov '09 OHIO WRANGLER 1
News More vaccine, but not for public (Oct '09) Oct '09 Insert Name Here 3
More from around the web