Greenville Man Arrested on Numerous C...

Greenville Man Arrested on Numerous Child Pornography Charges

There are 15 comments on the WLTX Columbia story from Jan 23, 2007, titled Greenville Man Arrested on Numerous Child Pornography Charges. In it, WLTX Columbia reports that:

Greenville County deputies arrested a 33-year-old man they engaged in sex acts with children.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WLTX Columbia.

Jukebox

Little River, SC

#1 Jan 23, 2007
Please keep this sicko off the streets forever.
Chickenlittle

Columbia, SC

#2 Jan 23, 2007
He needs to be castrated and incarcerated for his entire life. If he does not agree with the castration he needs to be killed. He will do this over and over and will never stop. How many lives has he ruined? How many more?
mitch

Florence, SC

#3 Jan 24, 2007
why does this punk get a bond set as low as it is,this gives him a chance to get out with 10%,thats 19.500 and he goes on the run and does this to another child. set a bond for freaks like this in the millons so they dont get another chance to do this over and over.if he did this to my child,sorry i cant say what i would do to punks like this..*&%$#@@*&%#@...
Princess

Sumter, SC

#4 Jan 24, 2007
What was the man thinking about doing this to these beautiful little kids. He should be in the chair for that and be posted without bond and serve 2 life sentences
Brenda

Decatur, GA

#5 Jan 24, 2007
Why have our Legislators not put into law that child molestors never be released into society after conviction?
Lexington County

Saudi Arabia

#6 Jan 24, 2007
We throw a man in jail for internet solicitation of a minor and give him a $200.000 dollar bond???? Something seems wrong here...
Donald

United States

#7 Jan 24, 2007
I've known the Lexington man that was arrested for a while. I know he was arrested for doing things on the internet. His bond was 200k. So tell me this one thing. How do you find time to take care of a Wife,Child, and a Full Time job and still have a chance at doing something with a minor? Second of all, shouldn't the parents be to blame for not checking there childs internet viewings?
Trapped

Saudi Arabia

#8 Jan 24, 2007
What was the supposed 13 year old doing in an adult romance chat room anyway??? Is there not age requirements/verification in these rooms???
Sheina

White House, TN

#9 Jan 24, 2007
Parents should be more proactive but lets make this clear, The only person to blame for this happening is the sick pervert who molested the kids. I hope this guy is chemically castrated.
Fat Friar

Orangeburg, SC

#10 Jan 25, 2007
It's my belief that those who can't "keep it in their pants" should have "it" removed! If you're into kiddie porn and sexual assault on kids, then perhaps the removal of the "offending appendage" would be a wise course of action.

Forget his "civil rights" since he chose not to be civil in his actions. Strong punishment might just help deter some crimes.
Jukebox

Little River, SC

#11 Jan 25, 2007
Fat Friar wrote:
It's my belief that those who can't "keep it in their pants" should have "it" removed! If you're into kiddie porn and sexual assault on kids, then perhaps the removal of the "offending appendage" would be a wise course of action.
Forget his "civil rights" since he chose not to be civil in his actions. Strong punishment might just help deter some crimes.
Absolutely a good idea.
jay

Newnan, GA

#12 Jul 25, 2007
this is not good for anyone we should all so it better
phil

Newnan, GA

#13 Jul 25, 2007
he was a very good man and very very very nice looking .why did he have to do this
MadMom

Anderson, SC

#14 Feb 25, 2010
WTH Phil? He was a VERY GOOD MAN? Nice Looking?? He is a freaking pervert and needs to be put to death!! Child Molesters can not be rehabilitated!!!! An eye for an eye!
Bull Dozier

Irmo, SC

#15 Feb 28, 2010
Donald wrote:
I've known the Lexington man that was arrested for a while. I know he was arrested for doing things on the internet. His bond was 200k. So tell me this one thing. How do you find time to take care of a Wife,Child, and a Full Time job and still have a chance at doing something with a minor? Second of all, shouldn't the parents be to blame for not checking there childs internet viewings?
Speaking on your scond point, parent or guardian needs to have a foot put in their lazy a$$es by law enforcement and DSS for child endangerment. Let's face it, if the child is under age, it means they are still under the protection of their parent or guardian. The Solicitor's office needs to have a foot planted up their lazy a$$es for not looking further into these types of cases than to put sicko pervertos in jail.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Greenville County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sheriff Loftis responds to accusations made by ... Jun '16 glm5425 1
Sheriff Loftis?? REPLACE AT ALL COST!!!! Jun '16 Birdmanescapes 3
The Good Doctor Jun '16 Birdmanescapes 1
Demetrice WHO? May '16 Palmetto Boy 1
News SC deputies: 11 cyclists victims in strange rev... (Apr '15) Apr '15 Mega Monster 15
robin scheon (Mar '15) Mar '15 Ron from wv 1
News Truth Check: Greenville County's proposed 'penn... (Nov '14) Nov '14 greo 1
More from around the web