Jo, i think your words were lost on the ditzs. Doesn't look like TAI even gets the point.Gee, the way I read it,
"1. For neglect of duty, misuse of office, or incompetence in the performance of duties when that neglect of duty, misuse of office, or incompetence in the performance of duties has a material adverse effect upon the conduct of the office, or"
I'd say the misuse of office,(by installing a personal friend as interim county administrator or helping a campign contributor in pressuring a county employee to prematurely release sureties for starters). While I understand the petitions may have been filed based on the indictments, it doesn't mean they couldn't be removed by petition just because they weren't convicted.
Either way, it's a mute point, TA's gone and soon the other three will be gone too.
And 'mute', are you a friggin idiot? Try looking up the difference between 'mute' and 'moot', ok?
You make your own point, dumbass, that the petitions were filed based on the convictions. Which had not happened. They did not file on any other basis. Case closed. Dumbass.
See what level of intelligence I have to deal with here, Jo?