Appeals court rules against Dinardo

Appeals court rules against Dinardo

There are 1 comment on the Connecticut Post story from May 21, 2012, titled Appeals court rules against Dinardo. In it, Connecticut Post reports that:

The state Appellate Court Monday upheld a nearly $400,000 judgment against Bridgeport developer Sal DiNardo as part of his crushed plan to build a cranberry bog on one of Fairfield County's most expensive properties.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Connecticut Post.

What else is new

Stamford, CT

#1 May 22, 2012
That fine is nothing for that arrogant pr!ck dinardo! It should have been 10 times that amount. In addition to the fine, members of the public should be able to kick the crap out him on a daily basis until that egomaniac comes back down to earth!! I'll go first. Any other takers?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Fairfield County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bridgeport agency awarded $5.1m for senior job ... Oct 25 Samuels Furnace Man 3
Fairfield County Criminal Mugshots and Arrests... Sep '16 Andrew 2
Christina McGill Aug '16 Advice 1
News Parking passes on sale for Ridgefield Fourth of... Jun '16 Will 1
News Bridgeport ranked 2nd richest U.S. city (Nov '15) Jun '16 Samuels Furnace Man 4
News New bridges now open on SB Route 8/25 Jun '16 America Gentleman... 1
Repair or Replace your Appliance? Jun '16 Will 1
More from around the web