Major Decrease in Feral Cat Population

Jan 23, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Patch.com

The number of feral animals in the care of the Fairfax County Animal Shelter's foster care program has decreased by 58 percent since last year, according to officials at the shelter.A The animal shelter attributes the changing numbers to a program implemented three years ago: Trap, Neuter, Return .

Comments
1 - 2 of 2 Comments Last updated Jan 29, 2012
Reality For Psychotics

Pipestone, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 24, 2012
 
Fairfax county has an estimated population of 54,950 feral-cats.(According to TNR advocates OWN resources.) Doing a 1-year population growth projection on them with a 90% survival and breeding rate of only 2-times a year (not 3 or 4 like they are capable of), this means in one year you'll have about 797,464 feral-cats. This means approximately 2,185 NEW feral cats are being born EACH DAY from present population numbers.

You MUST trap and sterilize 2,185 cats PER DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK to just match their breeding rates. You must trap and sterilize MORE than this PER DAY to slow-down their breeding rates.

Now lets look at costs.

TNR costs PER CAT in your area comes to
Trap/Fieldwork $50
Neuter/Spay $30
Physical Exams $40
Vaccinations $30
Estimated Cost of TNR in Fairfax, Virginia Per Cat $150

These are costs that must be diverted from your community by either volunteer hours, donations, or outright cash valued at $327,750.00 PER DAY ($119,628,750.00 yearly). Resources diverted (stolen by con-artists) into sterilizing invasive-species cats. And that's just to match how many are being born per day, into perpetuity.

This also does nothing to stop them of why they don't belong there in the first place -- spread diseases, destroy wildlife, destroy property, an invasive-species, etc.

I suspect you can accredit your decline of feral-cats to all those people who are smarter and shooting or drowning any excess cats now. Because TNR methods have never worked -- ANYWHERE.
TNR Tortures Animals

Pipestone, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 29, 2012
 
Here's how TNR-MATH works:

"In NYC there are currently 465 registered TNR colonies. When TNR began in these colonies, 6047 cats were present today, there are 4523 cats present, a decline of approximately 25 percent." (Quoted from an Alley Cnt Allies member who was SO proud of this.)

Apparently, if you TNR 4 cats and 3 die from being flattened by cars this is a 75% decline of feral-cats statewide.

Of those 6,047 cats they've only REDUCED the total by 1,524 cats, about 127 PER YEAR. That's only 0.08% of the 1,806,310 feral-cats within the city's limits.(data taken direct from TNR-advocates' own resources)

Guess how many have been born IN JUST THE LAST 6 MONTHS (hoping like hell that they're not breeding every 4 months). Let's do the math...

(1/2 total = females) 903,155 X 5 (avg. number in a litter)= 4,515,775 NEW CATS. Which lowers the number of them that have been reduced by TNR idiots to only 0.024%. THEY ARE GOING BACKWARD.

Guess how many will be born in another 6 months?(4,515,775 / 2) X 5 = 11,289,438.

Remember. the first 903,155 females are still breeding. For another 4,515,775. Add in the pre-existing 1,806,310, bringing the grand total in just ONE YEAR to 17,611,523 CATS. Which means that TNR groups have only reduced the cat-population by 0.008% of them. That's not even 1/100th of 1%.

Alley-Cat-ALL-LIES can't even reduce cats in their own city, yet they promote it as a worldwide solution. Then even bigger fools fall for it and promote it.

[Note: this recursive calculation population-growth problem actually requires advanced calculus with many more variables and will result in differing numbers; some higher, some lower, depending on how many years you do the population-growth projection when using both methods; but the results are just as astoundingly large no matter which method you use. I only include the dumbed-down version here so those of you with at least half a brain can comprehend and do the math yourself. Besides, it doesn't matter how many feral-cats are roaming free. If even ONE invasive-species cat is roaming free and has destroyed even ONE native animal, then that invasive-species cat must be destroyed. These numbers are only important to alert all others to how many cats must be destroyed and if they'll ever have the financial resources to do so by using their preferred method. In most cases, every municipality must allocate anywhere from 1/10th to 1/2 $BILLION PER YEAR if employing TNR costs just to catch-up to their breeding rates -- sustaining that expense YEARLY into perpetuity. Whereas shooting them results in costs substantially lower, in the range of $2,000 to $75,000 for 1 year. Which ends up being a ONE-TIME-EXPENSE. Something that is attainable by the tax-base in most every area.]

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••