Oct 5, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger
Comments
|
I am grateful for the involvement of the kids who are in the court, reaching out to peers. I do not understand, though why compensation for theft in addition to admittance of the crime are not the primary requirements. Community service is always a good thing, but does it always relate to the issue which brings the person into the legal system? In cases of theft & vandalism, the cost must be carried by the victim of the crime. How does community service help that? The victim is still out financially, and trust is compromised.
|
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Driscoll Is Innocent | Nov 24 | John Kimble | 2 |
| Sawyer Avoids Jail...For Now. | Nov 7 | Tom Paine | 1 |
| Dugan Twitters His Intent to Run Again | Nov '09 | Tom Paine | 1 |
| Shelly Marie Brooks Charged with stealing $19,6... | Oct '09 | Forest LaRock | 1 |
| Deadly drug still a mystery; Three weeks ago, a... (Apr '09) | Sep '09 | Syd | 15 |
| Area solar activity heats up; Energy companies ... | Aug '09 | Grouchy Goat | 1 |
| New water rules may cost Bend $22M; State consi... (Mar '09) | Mar '09 | RoboKnow | 1 |