Authorities: Man Shoots TV While Watching Bristol Palin Dance

Nov 17, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: KNX-AM Los Angeles

Steven Cowan, 67, of the town of Vermont, about 15 miles west of Madison, then pointed the gun at his wife, 66-year-old Janice Cowan, who escaped and called police, authorities said.

Comments (Page 11)

Showing posts 201 - 207 of207
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Eric L

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#210
Nov 22, 2010
 
Captain Yesterday wrote:
<quoted text>
Mostly you're talking about Robert E. Lee (and his right arm, Stonewall Jackson). Poor generalship on the part of Northerners prior to the accession of Grant and Sherman to high military leadership positions was the only think keeping the South in the war, really.
And thank goodness they lost, even if some of them ARE still re-living the war to this day....:)
You are right. That and the fact that the north had to improve its cavalry (that was settled by 1863).Grant, Sherman, Meade and Thomas combined with better staffwork with an emphasis on overall strategy. Lincoln (unlike Davis) aggressively fired and demoted generals who messed up major campaigns. Contrast that with Davis having extreme reservations about a John Bell Hood, yet allowing such a incompetent to lead a major action like the Franklin/Nashville campaign (one of the biggest blunders in the history of the Civil War).
The problem with CSA apologists is that they only like select scenes from Act I, then leave before Act II is over because they don't like the actors or change in plot there (and any number of other excuses for not reviewing it properly).

“no one told me”

Since: Dec 07

Denver

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#211
Nov 22, 2010
 
Eric L wrote:
<quoted text>
You are right. That and the fact that the north had to improve its cavalry (that was settled by 1863).Grant, Sherman, Meade and Thomas combined with better staffwork with an emphasis on overall strategy. Lincoln (unlike Davis) aggressively fired and demoted generals who messed up major campaigns. Contrast that with Davis having extreme reservations about a John Bell Hood, yet allowing such a incompetent to lead a major action like the Franklin/Nashville campaign (one of the biggest blunders in the history of the Civil War).
The problem with CSA apologists is that they only like select scenes from Act I, then leave before Act II is over because they don't like the actors or change in plot there (and any number of other excuses for not reviewing it properly).
As you seem to know a lot about the CW, what part of the constitution did Lincoln use to justify his act of war against the slave states who wished to secede?

I thought the states were a voluntary association.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#212
Nov 22, 2010
 
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
As you seem to know a lot about the CW, what part of the constitution did Lincoln use to justify his act of war against the slave states who wished to secede?
I thought the states were a voluntary association.
It was not a voluntary association. The drafters of the constitution were supposed to make amendments to the Articles of Confederation, not scrap it and write a new piece of toilet paper. They then forced the states to sign it.

The South (with South Carolina being the richest) would never be let go with out a fight. The tax loss alone would cripple the Union. Of course you don't learn that from a government school textbook. Instead, evil men like Lincoln, Grant, and Sherman are worshiped as heroes.
Eric L

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#213
Nov 22, 2010
 
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
As you seem to know a lot about the CW, what part of the constitution did Lincoln use to justify his act of war against the slave states who wished to secede?
I thought the states were a voluntary association.
The Articles of Confederation for starters. It also seemed to satisfy Andrew Jackson too when he put his foot down regarding South Carolina's earlier attempts at secession as well.

FTR

“Community Liar-in-Chief”

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#214
Nov 23, 2010
 
swampmudd wrote:
<quoted text>Death panels = Lie. 200 million a day trip = Lie, Obama is a Muslim = Lie. Pelosi getting drunk on her jet = Lie. Michele Obama flying chefs in on Air Force oneto make lunch = Lie. Need we go on.
You haven't proved any of these are lies. Provide credible links that PROVE these are lies! Yes, please go on.

“BILLARY 2016 ”

Since: Aug 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#215
Nov 24, 2010
 
dont snow me wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on, fatfu*k, picture of your bulbous head. bawk, bawk, bawk
No means no.
Remember that when
you are raping your
next victim.

Since: May 08

Deltona Fla

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#216
Nov 24, 2010
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FTR wrote:
<quoted text>You haven't proved any of these are lies. Provide credible links that PROVE these are lies! Yes, please go on.
I believe the burden of proof is on the accuser. But since that is no longer the case prove you did not have sex with a gay man.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 201 - 207 of207
|
next page >
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••