Where is our Sheriff??

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#1 Jun 24, 2010
Back in the good old days, the bankers hired the Pinkerton Security Corporation to go-in and take people’s land and live stock during the 1800′s. The authority Pinkertons needed was from the Sheriff. After paying-off the Sheriff, the representatives of the bank (Pinkertons) would enforce their own laws on the residents in that county.
Today, it’s the Federal Government and all their agencies that want to impose federal laws on county residents,(soon) gun confiscation, revenue action, and FEMA emergency intervention with martial law overtones. OUR county sheriff has the ultimate authority to stop any and all federal agencies from confiscation, or conducting any federal business in the county at his/her discretion.
The sheriff is an elected official by the people and is NOT a bureaucratic employee. He has authority over any and all city and county property, and it’s residents. The ONLY authority over the sheriff is the Coroner, in most counties.
There is a move in our country to usurp the authority of all county sheriffs by congressional authority, therefore, removing the Constitution as the sheriff’s legal means to protect their county residents from federal laws and the out-of-control Patriot Act. The sheriff is the very LAST defense against tyranny and our enforcer of the Constitution, which each and every sheriff raised their right hand to uphold the 10th amendment.

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.”

Twenty two plus states are considering legislation to assure sovereignty under the 10th amendment of the United States Constitution.

Tyranny has reached our shores and THEY are showing their faces,
Sovereign state citizens need to address these issues at county commissioner meetings, and are encouraged to join membership organizations that have the manpower to encourage state and local authorities to face (head-on) the approaching danger of how tyranny is no longer a late night talk show interest, but a clear and present danger.

Sheriffs across the country are realizing the authority of which they never thought they would ever have to use. The former Sheriff of Graham County in Arizona is one that has appeared on many radio and TV shows. He is a constitutionalist with a message for all sheriff’s in America.

“Please join me in the fight to regain our rights, while the price to pay is less than death. I am committed to doing all we can peacefully to get our country back. In order to succeed, we must first make ourselves aware of the problem. We must educate ourselves, and then we can know what action to take. One of the best and easiest solutions is to depend on local officials, especially the sheriff, to stand against federal intervention and federal criminality.”

So Sheriff, Where do you stand? Are you going to let washington and mexico run over us or are you going to Walk tall and carry a big stick? We are waiting.
ExCon

Lillington, NC

#2 Jun 27, 2010
HGR1 wrote:
Back in the good old days, the bankers hired the Pinkerton Security Corporation to go-in and take people’s land and live stock during the 1800′s. The authority Pinkertons needed was from the Sheriff. After paying-off the Sheriff, the representatives of the bank (Pinkertons) would enforce their own laws on the residents in that county.
Today, it’s the Federal Government and all their agencies that want to impose federal laws on county residents,(soon) gun confiscation, revenue action, and FEMA emergency intervention with martial law overtones. OUR county sheriff has the ultimate authority to stop any and all federal agencies from confiscation, or conducting any federal business in the county at his/her discretion.
The sheriff is an elected official by the people and is NOT a bureaucratic employee. He has authority over any and all city and county property, and it’s residents. The ONLY authority over the sheriff is the Coroner, in most counties.
There is a move in our country to usurp the authority of all county sheriffs by congressional authority, therefore, removing the Constitution as the sheriff’s legal means to protect their county residents from federal laws and the out-of-control Patriot Act. The sheriff is the very LAST defense against tyranny and our enforcer of the Constitution, which each and every sheriff raised their right hand to uphold the 10th amendment.
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.”
Twenty two plus states are considering legislation to assure sovereignty under the 10th amendment of the United States Constitution.
Tyranny has reached our shores and THEY are showing their faces,
Sovereign state citizens need to address these issues at county commissioner meetings, and are encouraged to join membership organizations that have the manpower to encourage state and local authorities to face (head-on) the approaching danger of how tyranny is no longer a late night talk show interest, but a clear and present danger.
Sheriffs across the country are realizing the authority of which they never thought they would ever have to use. The former Sheriff of Graham County in Arizona is one that has appeared on many radio and TV shows. He is a constitutionalist with a message for all sheriff’s in America.
“Please join me in the fight to regain our rights, while the price to pay is less than death. I am committed to doing all we can peacefully to get our country back. In order to succeed, we must first make ourselves aware of the problem. We must educate ourselves, and then we can know what action to take. One of the best and easiest solutions is to depend on local officials, especially the sheriff, to stand against federal intervention and federal criminality.”
So Sheriff, Where do you stand? Are you going to let washington and mexico run over us or are you going to Walk tall and carry a big stick? We are waiting.
Your a paranoid idiot, and just to clarify what was your unit? You seem to have all the answers but yet remain hidden. Probably unemployed food stamper. The only time your not on the computer is when you are trading your WIC stamps for smokes and beer.

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#3 Jun 27, 2010
ExCon wrote:
<quoted text>
Your a paranoid idiot
Whatever trailer park boy. Your an ignorant brainwashed fool aren't you? If you'd get off your sister for a while and read something besides penthouse forum and liberal bias, you'd be up to speed. Here is the link to view the treaty that we recently entered into. My analysis follows and has concrete backing.
http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/49907.htm

Although the word “illicit” is used extensively in order to make the convention sound less anti-gun than it actually is, we need to look very carefully at the purposes and definitions to see whether it is, in fact, limited in scope to persons illegally moving guns across borders in order to arm violent criminal cartels:

The seventh precatory clause “STRESS[ES] the need, in peace processes and post-conflict situations, to achieve effective control of firearms, ammunition, explosives, and other related materials in order to prevent their entry into the illicit market;”-- thereby endorsing comprehensive gun and ammunition control, in violation of McClure-Volkmer (which deregulated ammunition) and of the Second Amendment to the Constitution.

Furthermore, the tenth precatory clause supports a “know-your-customer policy for dealers [in firearms]”-- something which would rapidly lead to an abolition of firearms in a country as large and transient as the United States.

And the twelfth precatory clause acknowledges the rights of parties to enact their own gun laws, but only with respect to aspects of a “wholly domestic character.”

We have seen, as recently as the April 15 New York Times, how battles with the Mexican drug cartels have been fanned into an issue which is being used to justify the passage of every major gun control initiative in modern American history.

We see how these “slippery slope” findings are actually implemented when we look at the definitions:

“Illicit manufacturing” of firearms is defined as “assembly of firearms [or] ammunition... without a license...”

Hence, reloading ammunition -- or putting together a lawful firearm from a kit -- is clearly “illicit manufacturing.” Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be “illicit manufacturing.” And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy definition of “illicit manufacturing.”

“Firearm” has a similarly questionable definition. Borrowing from the open-ended definitions in federal law which have continue to vex us (and people like Olofson in Wisconsin), any barreled weapon “which... may be readily converted to expel a bullet” would be a firearm. Even worse,“any other weapon”(a term which is not defined) is a “firearm.” This surely includes BB guns -- and who knows what else.

“Cartridge cases” and “projectiles” are defined as “ammunition.”

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#4 Jun 27, 2010
SUBSTANTIVE PROVISIONS

In Article IV, parties commit to adopting “necessary legislative or other measures” to criminalize illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms. Remember that “illicit manufacturing” includes reloading and modifying or assembling any firearm in any way. And, while treaties should not trump the Bill of Rights (in contrast to what the Supreme Court held in Missouri v. Holland), they do have the force of statute -- which would mean that the Obama administration could promulgate regulations on the basis of this treaty which would ban any modification or machining of any firearm in any manner whatsoever except by license of the government.

Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized acts should include “association or conspiracy” in connection with “said offenses”-- which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.

Article V requires each party to “adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention” under a variety of circumstances. We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for it to define offenses “committed in its territory” in a very broad way. And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of the convention. And we also know that other countries such as Spain have tried to use their treaty powers to put American officials on trial..
Article VI requires “appropriate markings” on firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition -- a requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are not technologically possible or which are possible only at a prohibitively expensive cost.

Article VII requires confiscation and forfeiture of illicit firearms.

Articles VIII, IX, and X would increase the role of government, in ways which cannot be foreseen, in supervising the import and export of firearms and ammunition.

Article XI requires the maintenance of any records, for a “reasonable time,” that the government determines to be necessary to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a national registry or database.

Article XIII authorizes the “exchange of information” with respect to FFL’s -- presumably providing information on Americans to the corrupt Mexican police which are the source of many, if not most, of the illicit firearms.

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#5 Jun 27, 2010
Now, prove this wrong or keep your ignorant, uninformed, misguided, pie hole shut.
ExCon

Lillington, NC

#6 Jun 28, 2010
HGR1 wrote:
Now, prove this wrong or keep your ignorant, uninformed, misguided, pie hole shut.
Great Beck quotes but only shows the truth.

Your a fraud. No service, no job, and no education. I bet you even drive a toyota or honda. Another over weight wanna be that never was. Change your name to WIC DADDY loser.

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#7 Jun 28, 2010
ExCon wrote:
<quoted text>
Great Beck quotes but only shows the truth.
Your a fraud. No service, no job, and no education. I bet you even drive a toyota or honda. Another over weight wanna be that never was. Change your name to WIC DADDY loser.
Beck quotes?? Thats it? Thats all you can say? These ARE NOT from beck dipsh*t. And WIC? [email protected]! That's for women and children. You are soooooo ignorant.
your personal attacks have nothing to do with the topic here???? What point are you trying to make other than you are incapable of reading facts and retaining the information?? your not even arguing a point. Your just a troll. Your post is inflammatory, ignorant, and irrelevant. Bye bye loser.

Since: Jun 10

No liberals, USA

#8 Jun 28, 2010
ExCon wrote:
<quoted text>
Great Beck quotes but only shows the truth.
Your a fraud. No service, no job, and no education. I bet you even drive a toyota or honda. Another over weight wanna be that never was. Change your name to WIC DADDY loser.
In order to be a "fraud", Don't you have to be claiming that you are something that your not? Where is that in these posts? Shows how stupid you are. This goes way beyond Beck moron.

“TRUE BLUE AMERICANA”

Since: Mar 09

Engelhard NC

#9 Jul 8, 2010
Been three weeks now and NO response from OUR sheriff. The P.I.O. BJ Fore was supposed to get JCG broadcasting a statement TWO weeks ago..... still waiting..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Caldwell County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
American Idol Finalist coming to Lenoir Aug 5 styledo 1
News Man will stand trial on rape charges (Feb '09) Jul 28 Will 6
News Burke Co. teen sentenced to 12 years for sex cr... Jun '16 LIL OLE ME 10
News Flamboyant, eccentric Willard Blevins dies (Jul '14) Apr '16 Cchurch 40
News Caldwell schools lose 75 staff positions (Aug '13) Mar '16 Wake up 3
Why Preachers Push Cruz NOT Trump Mar '16 Vote For Trump 1
News Crawford trial expected to start today (Nov '12) Feb '16 Sam I am 51
More from around the web