Child-Killer Nathan Shaw Still Claims...

Child-Killer Nathan Shaw Still Claims Murder Was an Accident

There are 3 comments on the WTAJ story from Mar 8, 2011, titled Child-Killer Nathan Shaw Still Claims Murder Was an Accident. In it, WTAJ reports that:

Four years after leaving the Blair County courthouse a convicted child killer, Nathan Shaw still claims the murder was an accident and that claim generated quite a response.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WTAJ.

Joe Castro

Mount Gilead, OH

#1 Mar 11, 2011
I feel it really don't matter because of him a harmless child was killed.He's a grown man and knows better.Now a child will never see another birthday from shaws actions.He know what was right and what was wrong
uncle al

Altoona, PA

#2 Mar 20, 2011
not all the shaws stick up for him i feel terrible for christina and her family
anom

Altoona, PA

#3 Mar 20, 2011
watch the news in ca castro you DICK

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Blair County Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Anderson Facing Drug-Related Charges in High-Sp... Jul '17 Jones 1
News 'Creepy' clowns in Pa.: Stabbing investigated,a (Oct '16) Oct '16 Circus Dawn 1
News 'Creepy' clowns in Pa.: Stabbing investigated,a (Oct '16) Oct '16 The Purge Kernel ... 5
Vote for Hillary shes a crook (Aug '16) Aug '16 Hillary is a crook 3
vincent e martz egor (Jun '16) Jun '16 martz friends 1
News Pennsylvania officer acquitted of assaulting re... (Apr '16) Apr '16 A Yankee 2 1
News Prison Officials Looking To Drop The Soap (Jun '09) Feb '16 DILF 5
More from around the web