Exxon CEO blames 'illiterate' public ...

Exxon CEO blames 'illiterate' public for 'overreacting' to global warming

There are 43 comments on the Daily Mail story from Jul 3, 2012, titled Exxon CEO blames 'illiterate' public for 'overreacting' to global warming. In it, Daily Mail reports that:

Exxon CEO blames 'illiterate' public for 'overreacting' to global warming... as most of the nation braces of record heat and severe weather for July 4 The CEO of ExxonMobile, the world's largest oil company, admits that fossil fuels are causing the Earth to warm, but insists, it's not a big deal.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Mail.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#21 Jul 6, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>LIAR.
You will never become a paid denier here. LOL.
Are there any paid deniers here. Now paid alarmist I could almost believe. Of course why pay someone like you for what you would do for free.

Care to start talking about climate change or would you rather stay with the personal attacks against me?

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#22 Jul 6, 2012
tina anne wrote:
I am sure that many could say the same about you.
Nah, he's nauseating Nauseous, more to be pitied than feeling sick over.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#23 Jul 6, 2012
tina anne wrote:
Now paid alarmist I could almost believe.
Not in a million years.
Ö¿Ö
SpaceBlues

Humble, TX

#24 Jul 6, 2012
home in lincoln county wrote:
<quoted text> what NO REPLY from MONEY all I just want to be's a paid denier!
Stop whining. You sound like tina.

Your cry has been heard:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48083693/ns/techn...

but read it.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#25 Jul 6, 2012
Earthling-1 wrote:
<quoted text>Not in a million years.
Ö¿Ö
I could almost believe a paid alarmist as well. Except why pay someone for something they will do just as well for free.
Northie

Spokane, WA

#26 Jul 6, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Huh?
Why are you here? Find a bully site to vent your mind.
Uh, he found a "bully site"...here.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#27 Jul 6, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Stop whining. You sound like tina.
Your cry has been heard:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48083693/ns/techn...
but read it.
Have you ever considered the reason so many skeptics sound alike and so many alarmist do not is because it the skeptics arugments are all based in truth.

As for MSNBC, I see that they are just as inaccurate as always. The volcanic activity removed all the O2 in the water. Something that would not happen even in your worse nightmares.
SpaceBlues

Humble, TX

#28 Jul 6, 2012
Northie wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, he found a "bully site"...here.
Like you said elsewhere:

It's safe to say that this is the most science-free climate forum I've seen yet. To me, this is merely a trip to the zoo.

Agreed.
SpaceBlues

Humble, TX

#29 Jul 6, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever considered the reason so many skeptics sound alike and so many alarmist do not is because it the skeptics arugments are all based in truth.
As for MSNBC, I see that they are just as inaccurate as always. The volcanic activity removed all the O2 in the water. Something that would not happen even in your worse nightmares.
Say what? Something about skeptics and MSNBC.

1. You are a denier, not a skeptic. Otherwise, you would not deny human-induced climate change.

2. You were boasting lately that the AGW died in 2008 and the tv channels did not report about it anymore... blah blah. So you lied again.

Oh about O2, it happens! I guess you don't pay attention to fish kills because of it in lakes, etc.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#30 Jul 6, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Say what? Something about skeptics and MSNBC.
1. You are a denier, not a skeptic. Otherwise, you would not deny human-induced climate change.
2. You were boasting lately that the AGW died in 2008 and the tv channels did not report about it anymore... blah blah. So you lied again.
Oh about O2, it happens! I guess you don't pay attention to fish kills because of it in lakes, etc.
1. Funny, one could call you a denier since you still deny that climate change is natural and not caused by man.

2. Care to show me a major news outlet that used AGW?

Funny you called me a liar and yet could not offer any proof that I did. It sounds like you and not I may be the liar. Of course the real truth is that you do not want to admit that climate change is not the result of man. That you are deep in denial about it and lash out at any who upset your fantasy. So you will continue to attack those like me and claim that we must be in denial since otherwise you would have to face the truth.
SpaceBlues

Humble, TX

#31 Jul 6, 2012
Who is a denier?

A denier is the one who does not grasp the science and mathematics behind the conclusion that humans have induced the global warming called the Antropogenic Global Warming, AGW, that is causing global climate change with measurable consequences in the present and in the future. Thus, a denier hopes that a blog or a book might allegedly "debunk man made global warming."

A denier is a loser every day.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
LoL at PAGAN HICKS

Los Angeles, CA

#32 Jul 6, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Like you said elsewhere:
It's safe to say that this is the most science-free climate forum I've seen yet. To me, this is merely a trip to the zoo.
Agreed.
WHY DIDN'T YOU or ANYONE in your CHURCH UNDERSTAND A TREE ISN'T A HEAT SENSOR DUE TO
LIEBIG'S LAW?

WHY didn't YOU or ANYONE you KNOW REALIZE Drs MANN JONES and BRIFFA were

CYFERING DOOMSDAY WITH F.A.K.E. MATH THAT MAKES HOCKEY STICKS?

WHY DIDN'T YOU KNOW THAT?
WHY DIDN'T THEY KNOW THAT?

WHY didn't THE TROPOSPHERIC HOTSPOT MANDATORY TO YOUR CHURCH'S DOCTRINES, EVER APPEAR?

WHY DIDN'T YOU REALIZE THEN, THAT WAS THE END of MAGIC GAS CHURCH?

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#33 Jul 7, 2012
Nauseous wrote:
Uh, he found a "bully site"...here.
You're not a bully, you're a loser.

“Happy, warm and comfortable”

Since: Oct 10

Mountain retreat, SE Spain

#34 Jul 7, 2012
SpamBotty wrote:
It's safe to say that this is the most science-free climate forum I've seen yet.
How many other "climate" forums have you seen, science free or otherwise?
Link to a couple.
It's safe to say that you're a "science-free" type of person, you make that blatantly obvious.
Northie

Spokane, WA

#35 Jul 8, 2012
“We are convinced that ExxonMobil’s longstanding support of a small cadre of global climate change skeptics, and those skeptics’ access to and influence on government policymakers, have made it increasingly difficult for the United States to demonstrate the moral clarity it needs across all facets of its diplomacy.”

- Senators Rockefeller and Snowe Letter to ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. Oct 27, 2006

http://climatechange.procon.org/sourcefiles/E...
litesong

Everett, WA

#36 Jul 8, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
It's safe to say that this is the most science-free climate forum I've seen yet.
Yeah,'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger dirtling' had good chances for free science education. But he freely freed himself from the rigor of science, & did NOT pursue his free hi skule deegreee.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#38 Jul 9, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
Who is a denier?
A denier is the one who does not grasp the science and mathematics behind the conclusion that humans have induced the global warming called the Antropogenic Global Warming, AGW, that is causing global climate change with measurable consequences in the present and in the future. Thus, a denier hopes that a blog or a book might allegedly "debunk man made global warming."
A denier is a loser every day.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Actually a denier is one who refuses to grasp that science, history, and mathematics has disproved the idea of AGW. Thousands of studies have debunked AGW and yet you deny that there is any science that disproves it. You deny the fact that much of what you once called science has been proven to be more fiction that fact.

Sorry, but the only thing that seems to be backing AGW is science fiction not science.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#39 Jul 9, 2012
Northie wrote:
“We are convinced that ExxonMobil’s longstanding support of a small cadre of global climate change skeptics, and those skeptics’ access to and influence on government policymakers, have made it increasingly difficult for the United States to demonstrate the moral clarity it needs across all facets of its diplomacy.”
- Senators Rockefeller and Snowe Letter to ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. Oct 27, 2006
http://climatechange.procon.org/sourcefiles/E...
Sounds like Greenpeace and friends are upset because someone with deep pockets dosn't agree with them not if the science is accurate. They sound like of they had their way the only people who should have access to those in power are the alarmists.

It is also funny to see groups like Greenpeace talk about moral leadership when they have had less than a stellar moral leadership.
PHD

Houston, TX

#40 Jul 9, 2012
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like Greenpeace and friends are upset because someone with deep pockets dosn't agree with them not if the science is accurate. They sound like of they had their way the only people who should have access to those in power are the alarmists.
It is also funny to see groups like Greenpeace talk about moral leadership when they have had less than a stellar moral leadership.
Much like your LESS THAN BOX OF ROCKS EDUCATION.The only thing that stellar is making another ASSumption of your self.
AGAIN WIND MILLS RULE!!!!

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#41 Jul 9, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>Much like your LESS THAN BOX OF ROCKS EDUCATION.The only thing that stellar is making another ASSumption of your self.
AGAIN WIND MILLS RULE!!!!
I leave the unfounded assumptions to experts in the field like you.

Wind hurts people and kills birds.

http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/2012/austr...

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/03/06/wind-tu...

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/gree...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Exxon Mobil Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oil business seen in strong position as Trump t... (Jan '17) Nov 19 C Kersey 21
Relief efforts Sep '17 Dam 1
News Trump Just Fired Every Senior Manager at the St... (Jan '17) Mar '17 Aponi 21
News How the U.S. can take control in the South Chin... (Feb '17) Feb '17 USA Today 1
News Think global warming's a fraud? These scientist... (Jan '17) Jan '17 Most Scientists R... 4
News The Latest: Senate to hold hearing on election ... (Dec '16) Jan '17 Batch 37 Pain Is ... 40
News UPDATE 1-U.S. Democrats, citing Russia, Exxon, ... (Jan '17) Jan '17 The Real Donald T... 1
More from around the web