whos better hhh or the undertaker

[warren losangeles]

undertaker, is 1 but that would be a good match.

[warren 123]

warren losangeles wrote:

undertaker, is 1 but that would be a good match.

yes hhh and undertakers match at wrestlemania was quite interesting

[JonnyreV]

I love it when people sight kayfabe accomplishments for proof of value. You have to look at WHY the people got what they got to determine awesomeness. why was HHH a multi time champ? Because he is very good at his job! He represents the company well outside the ring appearing in commercials and tv spots. He is a great athlete who puts on a very good show. To use some technical terms both taker and HHH have been described as some of the greatest workers in the buisnes. I agree. Both of them can put over just about anyone most of the time.
Takers wrestlimainia streak is a gimmick for sure, but it really does show you how much respect he has inside the industry. They guy is getting pretty old and he still innovates and entertains like no other. Dead or alive his characters have been awesome.

Both guys have suffered identity crisis over the years. is taker a zombie or a badass? HHH started out as a posh rich guy. Then kind of a biker thing... the dx was interesting... dominant heel champ...back to dx...king of kings...and whatever he is now

I would have to say HHH gets my vote simply because he has been more active in recent years and his character has so much more believably/depth. Taker very rarely gives and interview where as HHH could do a segment every week and we would all be ok with it. HHH is a little more injury prone, but Taker is getting to be pretty old...

[doggy boy]

undertaker is so much better than triple h he has more popularity and as aussie cena fan said he won 15-0 thats a record so he could crush triple h

[deadman]

triple h won 4world titles with the help of evolution some were just awrded he just one 2on his own and the rest with the help of other tams like corporation mcmahon-helmsley faction etc.

[claire]

close call but taker always... hhh is great but taker is a flipin bigger legend than trip h so taker wins

[Ace]

Undertaker all the way!Even my grandma could beat HHH.

[mattatude]

I LIKE HHH BUT UNDERTAKER IS JUST THE BEST

[al snow matchs rule]

taker

[mattatude]

undertaker

[cena]

hhh is better

[huh]

oviously taker triple gay sucks and has to sux his wife stephs balls to win a match

[Shafkat WWE biggest fan]

Underraker DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHHHHHH HE ROCKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK Ksssssssssssssssssssssssss HHH is ok

[Joe Revis]

deadman wrote:

triple h won 4world titles with the help of evolution some were just awrded he just one 2on his own and the rest with the help of other tams like corporation mcmahon-helmsley faction etc.

Nope, that's wrong.

[warren losangeles]

Taker but thats a no brainer, only HHH 619 would think differently.

[keven]

triple h is 100 time better

[keven]

triple h is much better

[styles clash]

taker now and back in the day

[nicholas]

hhh is definitely the better un dertaker only has d winning streak at wrestlemania because he is a fan favourite at they do that to make wwe a more favoured show

[Oldschoolwrestli ngFan]

I will catch crap for this, but Trips-now.

Trips is getting slow but Taker has almost no speed and has had to be carried in all his recent matches, atleast HHH can put on good performances.
However, Taker was better as recent has 3 years ago.