"treasonous teabaggers"? Sounds exactly like the extremism you pretend to berate. Adherence to the Constitution may counbt as extremism in a radicals playbook, but not to most reasonable people with any reasonable understanding of our Foundation(s).Most normal citizens don't like extremism no matter if it comes from the right or left. The treasonous teabaggers will cost the gop dearly in future elections once their theocratic goals are revealed. Those of you screaming 'socialism''communist,' and 'Marxism' need a remedial course in political science!
"theocratic goals"? That would be the "share the wealth - for fairness' sake" crowd. That would be the enviros pushing their "green agenda" based on the discount pseudo-religion of "climate change". That would be selective enforcement of the law based on pre-concieved, but ill-concieved notions of enforced "fairness" at the expense of others.
A Nation of Laws and not Men is hardly theocratic, or treasonous, or any other derogatory term you can conjur. A nation of whims is the greatest failure of all.
And I believe that those yelling about "'socialism''communist,' and 'Marxism'" know exactly what they speak of. The most virulent anti-communists, anti-socialists, anti-marxists are those who've lived under those systems - and have escaped from them, often losing everything in the process, including family and what little assets that they had. Next in line to abhor these institutions are those who understand them well. Those who see clearly the abysmal conditions that these institutions have wrought. Those who see the inherent UNfairness of false fairness enforced at gun point.
Bucky, go forth and educate yourself before spewing ignorant vitriol. And get a new name - Yer not very subtle.