BF dam deal near

BF dam deal near

There are 4 comments on the Brattleboro Reformer story from Mar 23, 2010, titled BF dam deal near. In it, Brattleboro Reformer reports that:

The settlement between a New Hampshire town and the owner of the hydroelectric dams on the Connecticut River has officials in Rockingham thinking about the next step they are facing with the Canadian energy giant.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Brattleboro Reformer.


Little Rock, AR

#1 Mar 24, 2010
Look what the Canadiens did when they got pushed around. Now they're charging a lot more for power than VY offered the state and scumlin's OK with that. I wonder what kind of lawsuits will come about when Entergy takes the state to court...

Bellows Falls, VT

#2 Mar 24, 2010
Will the Reformer or Topix enforce standards against name calling? Does it help the conversation in the slightest to allow people who hide their own names - like "Hovermont" here - put up posts whose entire point is to call someone else a name?

Now to the article. It's spectacularly uninformative. It could have, at minimum, given the relative outputs of the two dams. It claims the settlement on the NH dam "has officials in Rockingham thinking," but then doesn't demonstrate, in interviewing Ms. Roberts, that this has her thinking anything in particular beyond that the town needs to proceed with care. Having talked to town officials myself about this, I can assure everyone that proceeding with care has been the policy all along. So I guess the NH settlement has them thinking the same as they thought before it?

In that case the premise of the article falls apart.
Ben Dover

South Burlington, VT

#3 Mar 24, 2010
Whit if they are proceeding with care, then why did the Select board go with the #126,000,000.00 value?

This is not responsible at all. We will be paying back money also.They should of left the value at $90,000,000.00 until the state was done. This would of gave us a base line.

The selectman know better then this. I hope for taxpayers sake they didn't make thew wrong choice here.

Camilla is right if Trans Canada goes up ,everyone else should to.Lets put it to the residents!!

Whit ask your self ,where does all the tax money go.Trans Canada pays over 40% of our taxes and we don't have any thing to show for it. We can't even afford a new rec center. Yet our Select Board authorized the old one to be torn down.

This is the same as our wasteful Government, which your so fondly of Whit.

jim mitchell

Claremont, NH

#4 Mar 24, 2010
I rather suspect that TC knows the value is going to be even higher than the figure now and the selectboard will settle on the value as it now sits at 126 million.

While I supported the original agreement hindsight now shows that the taxpayers took the hit on their taxes when TC got lower taxes for 4 years.

The village should have a say in this with the town if they really want to work together.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

TransCanada Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Statement on TransCanada Oil Spill on Keystone ... 1 hr anonz 2
News TransCanada says 210,000 gallons of oil leaked ... 2 hr anonz 3
News TransCanada's Keystone Pipeline Shut After 5,00... 14 hr sure do tell eh 1
News TransCanada Keystone pipeline leaks 795,000 lit... 14 hr sure do tell eh 1
News Power generating station beginning to take shape (Jan '08) Oct '17 same went on here 133
News Inside The Herald - If a community is only wort... (Jan '08) Oct '17 2 late eh 57
News TranCanada donates $200K to rink expansion project (Nov '12) Sep '17 Meanwhile 11
More from around the web