Obama welcomes TransCanada plan for new pipeline

The White House on Monday welcomed a Canadian company's plan to build an oil pipeline from Oklahoma to Texas after President Barack Obama blocked the larger Keystone XL pipeline from Canada .

[anneutral]

what will the republican candidates talk about now?!?!?!?
oh yeah, contraceptives, abortion and gays.

[wondering]

anneutral wrote:

what will the republican candidates talk about now?!?!?!?
oh yeah, contraceptives, abortion and gays.

Obummer only did this because it is an election year. Watch how quick he flipflops if he gets reelected.

[Arnie]

http://www.topix.com/album/detail/ca/milton-o...

[VN Vet]

Obama is a liar, he had nothing to do with this. HE IS A LIAR POS. Look it up you dumbazz liberal crap.

[icu_]

Obama has been told by the Chinese that they expect to get our oil or they are calling their loans in. He has no choice anymore

[anneutral]

icu_ wrote:

Obama has been told by the Chinese that they expect to get our oil or they are calling their loans in. He has no choice anymore

exactly.

[anneutral]

wondering wrote:

<quoted text>Obummer only did this because it is an election year. Watch how quick he flipflops if he gets reelected.

that's what I was thinking too, but he loses the "green" and "liberal" votes by doing this.

[hsabin]

anneutral wrote:

what will the republican candidates talk about now?!?!?!?
oh yeah, contraceptives, abortion and gays.

UMmmmmm - the GOP aren't the ones bringing in the woman who says she needs help paying for condoms - when her boyfriends should be the ones to do this task. And they are'n't talking about gays other than they should get civil unions, not "marriage" contracts and abortion - most - DEMS and GOP women think this belongs in the bedroom and OUT of the hands of GOVERNMENT who shouldn't be snooping there anyway. AND I as a taxpayer don't want my taxes funding this option - its personal and should stay that way. IF and I repeat IF the DEMS want us taxpayers to fund abortions then set up plans that women purchase and pay for themselves, just like I don't think we need to pay for Viagra for men. Lets stick to HEALTH issues when we talk - agree?

[anneutral]

hsabin wrote:

<quoted text>
UMmmmmm - the GOP aren't the ones bringing in the woman who says she needs help paying for condoms - when her boyfriends should be the ones to do this task. And they are'n't talking about gays other than they should get civil unions, not "marriage" contracts and abortion - most - DEMS and GOP women think this belongs in the bedroom and OUT of the hands of GOVERNMENT who shouldn't be snooping there anyway. AND I as a taxpayer don't want my taxes funding this option - its personal and should stay that way. IF and I repeat IF the DEMS want us taxpayers to fund abortions then set up plans that women purchase and pay for themselves, just like I don't think we need to pay for Viagra for men. Lets stick to HEALTH issues when we talk - agree?

we can agree that you haven't got any idea what you're talking about.
.
you can read a transcript of the testimony here, and let me know where she talks about condoms
http://www.whatthefolly.com/2012/02/23/transc...
.
you can read about Mitt's openly gay campaign worker leaving because of GOP pressure here
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-tur...
.
you can read about abortion and the healthcare plan here
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21...
"Health plans on exchanges can offer abortion coverage. But if they do, subscribers who get federal subsidies will have to make separate premium payments for the abortion coverage. States can also ban this coverage."
.
.
and finally, why would I want to discuss healthcare on a thread about the Keystone Pipeline?