Poll: Should Ultrasounds Be Required ...

Poll: Should Ultrasounds Be Required Before Abortions?

There are 64 comments on the Patch.com story from Feb 24, 2012, titled Poll: Should Ultrasounds Be Required Before Abortions?. In it, Patch.com reports that:

A weakened form of legislation requiring an ultrasound before an abortion is meandering its way through the Virginia Legislature, following outcry that the original bill would have required invasive ultrasounds at early stages of pregnancy.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Patch.com.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

“Let Them Live”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#63 Mar 19, 2012
I wish he'd hook himself up to an IV full of smart liquid.
bluestreak resurgent wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently, he portrays himself as some Russologist or some such nonsense.

bluestreak resurgent

“idol of millions”

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#64 Mar 19, 2012
Jorja wrote:
<quoted text>
If you change the subject of a discussion prematurely, you demonstrate a lack of interest in the discussion and indicate that what you have to say is more important.
Well, it is important, just by virtue of the fact that we changed the subject!

Staunton, VA

#66 Mar 20, 2012
Former U.S. Sen. George Allen, a Virginia Republican who is running to return to the chamber, backs the “personhood” measure and would like to make it federal law. He isn’t saying whether he supports Virginia’s new law requiring women to undergo an ultrasound exam before having an abortion.
“He’s absolutely running away from it,” said former Republican Rep. Tom Davis, a Virginian who led his party’s campaign efforts in the House.“By refusing to say where you are, you almost get saddled with it anyway.”

Virginia lawmakers in Richmond delayed action on the “personhood” proposal after the women gathered on Feb. 23. Opponents, including Kaine, say the measure would outlaw abortion as well as forms of birth control, such as the pill, that work by preventing implantation of a fertilized egg.

De Soto, MO

#68 Oct 16, 2012
I'm so tired of this woman's body thing. As a man, why shouldn't I have right to raise the child if she doesn't want it. My girlfriend is pregnant and doesn't want the child and wants the baby to die , I want the baby and want my baby to live. Why can't she just sign away rights and give me my baby, end of story, she doesn't have to be mom.
How is it right to allow a woman to make all the decisions for a baby created by two people. If she carried the baby to term an I didn't want nothing to do with it, the government says I have a financial responsibility to care for the child. A mans right should begin at conception.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

The Washington Post Company Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Christian researcher warns rapture will begin S... Thu Big Nut 9
News Business Leaders of Color Stand Up For Immigran... Sep 17 Wildchild 1
News Trumpa s DACA deal with Democrats is already a ... Sep 14 Retribution 2
News 'You're Fired' may be harder than Trump thinks ... Sep 13 Uncle SamLee 7
News COMMENTARY The Democrats are responsible for Tr... Sep 10 TerriB1 1
News The Daily 202: Leading moderate announces retir... Sep 9 Rubio s Foam Partays 5
News 2017 is on pace for the second-lowest crime rat... Sep 7 Retribution 11
More from around the web