Iran Commander Behind Killing of U.S....

Iran Commander Behind Killing of U.S. Troops Reportedly ...

There are 20 comments on the Fox News story from Oct 15, 2011, titled Iran Commander Behind Killing of U.S. Troops Reportedly .... In it, Fox News reports that:

A key player in the Iran-backed plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia's ambassador to the U.S. was a senior military commander linked to the slaughter of U.S. troops in Iraq , The Washington Post reported Saturday.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Fox News.

scout

Castro Valley, CA

#1 Oct 15, 2011
Who is behind the killing of Iraqis?

Who is behind the killing of Afghans?

Who is behind the killing of Libyans?

Who is behind the killing by predators?

Who is behind the killing of Americans without due process?

The old glass house thing, again and again.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#2 Oct 15, 2011
scout wrote:
Who is behind the killing of Iraqis?
Who is behind the killing of Afghans?
Who is behind the killing of Libyans?
Who is behind the killing by predators?
Who is behind the killing of Americans without due process?
The old glass house thing, again and again.
Due process is in our Constitution, not theirs. Due process is for our people, not theirs.
scout

Castro Valley, CA

#3 Oct 15, 2011
geez. Obama murdered the American in Yemen.
scout

Castro Valley, CA

#4 Oct 15, 2011
Easy for Obama, as he's not an American, could care less about Constitutional rule of law. Marxists are like that.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#5 Oct 16, 2011
scout wrote:
geez. Obama murdered the American in Yemen.
Yes, but assassinating one of our own in another country without due process is one thing, but killing the citizen in another country of another country is something total different. You weren't talking about one of ours. You were talking about covering the citizen of another country with OUR Constitution.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#6 Oct 16, 2011
scout wrote:
Easy for Obama, as he's not an American, could care less about Constitutional rule of law. Marxists are like that.
But you're just as guilty in thinking our Constitution covers every person on the globe whether they are a U.S. citizen, or not.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#7 Oct 16, 2011
scout wrote:
Easy for Obama, as he's not an American, could care less about Constitutional rule of law. Marxists are like that.
Killing an Iranian does not require due process.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

#8 Oct 16, 2011
What is Wrong With You wrote:
<quoted text>Due process is in our Constitution, not theirs. Due process is for our people, not theirs.
This is why any justice loving person can't possibly be on your side.

We certainly aren't going to support the terrorists but to be honest, you guys are just as bad.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

#9 Oct 16, 2011
What is Wrong With You wrote:
<quoted text>Killing an Iranian does not require due process.
Ignoring international law means you can't fall back on it later.

Was 9/11 a legal attack on the USA? After all, you can't expect al quaida to give Americans the same due process they'd give their own people, can you?
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#10 Oct 16, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why any justice loving person can't possibly be on your side.
We certainly aren't going to support the terrorists but to be honest, you guys are just as bad.
This is why any rational person can't side with you.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#11 Oct 16, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignoring international law means you can't fall back on it later.
Was 9/11 a legal attack on the USA? After all, you can't expect al quaida to give Americans the same due process they'd give their own people, can you?
There is no such thing as "International Law". However, there is such a thing as Sovereignty that each country is to expect.

I don't expect another country to treat an American as they would their own, as they shouldn't expect us to treat one of theirs as we would one of our own. You want our Constitution to cover them, but we shouldn't expect them to treat ours by it. Each country is obligated to treat it's own citizens by it's own Laws. Our laws don't cover them as theirs don't cover us.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#12 Oct 16, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignoring international law means you can't fall back on it later.
Was 9/11 a legal attack on the USA? After all, you can't expect al quaida to give Americans the same due process they'd give their own people, can you?
Legal, or not, it was an attack and we had the right to peruse the attackers. If a country decided to harbor, sponsor, or refuse to aid in our efforts then we must decide if the apprehension of those criminals is worth the consequences of getting them. But it is within our right.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

#13 Oct 16, 2011
What is Wrong With You wrote:
<quoted text>Legal, or not, it was an attack and we had the right to peruse the attackers. If a country decided to harbor, sponsor, or refuse to aid in our efforts then we must decide if the apprehension of those criminals is worth the consequences of getting them. But it is within our right.
By the end of September 2001 the Taliban had offered to give up Bin Laden and all members of al quaida even though offering sanctury is a massive part of their culture. All they asked in return was that the USA proved that Al Quaida were behind the 9/11 attacks.

So, did you have a right to invade Afghanistan? You certainly had no right to invade Iraq. You certainly have no right to detain people without charge in guantanamo and you certainly have no right to claim to be the good guys when you kill more people than they do and piss all over justice or morality if it happens to suit your needs.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#14 Oct 16, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
By the end of September 2001 the Taliban had offered to give up Bin Laden and all members of al quaida even though offering sanctury is a massive part of their culture. All they asked in return was that the USA proved that Al Quaida were behind the 9/11 attacks.
So, did you have a right to invade Afghanistan? You certainly had no right to invade Iraq. You certainly have no right to detain people without charge in guantanamo and you certainly have no right to claim to be the good guys when you kill more people than they do and piss all over justice or morality if it happens to suit your needs.
It would seem that you have no clue about Iraq.

When we booted Sadaam out of Kuwait, we continued on to Bagdad after the invader. Knowing his fate, he quickly offered a truce to stay in power. One of the conditions for the truce was that a no fly zone be installed over most of Iraq. He agreed. Not only did he violate his agreement, he even fired on our planes. He broke his agreement, so we continued our initial invasion. We had EVERY right.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

#15 Oct 16, 2011
What is Wrong With You wrote:
<quoted text>It would seem that you have no clue about Iraq.
When we booted Sadaam out of Kuwait, we continued on to Bagdad after the invader. Knowing his fate, he quickly offered a truce to stay in power. One of the conditions for the truce was that a no fly zone be installed over most of Iraq. He agreed. Not only did he violate his agreement, he even fired on our planes. He broke his agreement, so we continued our initial invasion. We had EVERY right.
So thats the reason you're going to pretend you went into Iraq?

Just out of interest, what percentage of people do you think would agree with you?

As another piece of your education which will undoubtedly piss you off: The main reason for a ceasefire being rushed in gulf war one was the French forces were most of the way to bagdhad and Stormin' Norman didn't want his own victory eclipsed.

You know the french right? European chaps, the ones who had their soldiers attacked and killed in one of the Worlds first terrorist attacks by a guy name George Washington (you may have heard of him). Later they decided it was better to have some terrorists on their side so they bankrolled your war of independance and kept the vast majority of British forces involved fighting Napoleon.

More recently they've made America look like wqarmonger fools by asking for proof that there were WMD's in Iraq, forcing America to throw away her excuse for invasion.

You do know the French right? Your superiors in every way except language unless you take into consideration how badly you've murdered English.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#16 Oct 17, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
So thats the reason you're going to pretend you went into Iraq?
Just out of interest, what percentage of people do you think would agree with you?
As another piece of your education which will undoubtedly piss you off: The main reason for a ceasefire being rushed in gulf war one was the French forces were most of the way to bagdhad and Stormin' Norman didn't want his own victory eclipsed.
You know the french right? European chaps, the ones who had their soldiers attacked and killed in one of the Worlds first terrorist attacks by a guy name George Washington (you may have heard of him). Later they decided it was better to have some terrorists on their side so they bankrolled your war of independance and kept the vast majority of British forces involved fighting Napoleon.
More recently they've made America look like wqarmonger fools by asking for proof that there were WMD's in Iraq, forcing America to throw away her excuse for invasion.
You do know the French right? Your superiors in every way except language unless you take into consideration how badly you've murdered English.
I'm not like you...I don't take a pole of the most popular opinions then side myself with that. I'm old enough to know what happened. I was there. Were you? I don't need to regurgitate some indoctrinated pablum as if I know what I'm talking about. I do. Look it up. It's ALL there. But beware. Your Leftist instructors might not want you thinking for yourself.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#17 Oct 17, 2011
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
So thats the reason you're going to pretend you went into Iraq?
Just out of interest, what percentage of people do you think would agree with you?
As another piece of your education which will undoubtedly piss you off: The main reason for a ceasefire being rushed in gulf war one was the French forces were most of the way to bagdhad and Stormin' Norman didn't want his own victory eclipsed.
You know the french right? European chaps, the ones who had their soldiers attacked and killed in one of the Worlds first terrorist attacks by a guy name George Washington (you may have heard of him). Later they decided it was better to have some terrorists on their side so they bankrolled your war of independance and kept the vast majority of British forces involved fighting Napoleon.
More recently they've made America look like wqarmonger fools by asking for proof that there were WMD's in Iraq, forcing America to throw away her excuse for invasion.
You do know the French right? Your superiors in every way except language unless you take into consideration how badly you've murdered English.
You're just mad, because we had to bail your butts out in WWII, because had we not, you'd be speaking German. The fall of one of the World's greatest Empires to near defeat by a little megalomaniac with a bad mustache. It must really eat at you to know that you were getting spanked, until we entered into the war.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#18 Oct 17, 2011
Not only did we send you packing in the Revolutionary War, we had to save your butts in WW2. I can understand how our mere existence would be a constant reminder of your ineptness.
What is Wrong With You

Apple Valley, CA

#19 Oct 17, 2011
One man in America has bigger gonads than your entire country.
I can read

Falkirk, UK

#20 Oct 17, 2011
What is Wrong With You wrote:
One man in America has bigger gonads than your entire country.
Sadly they muffle your voice.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

The Washington Post Company Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man shoots himself, wife in church after discus... 9 hr Rick Perry s Closet 4
News Child-care workers in D.C. would get more time ... Sat USA Today 1
News Republican accused of sexual encounter with gir... Sat roymoorescrotchle... 289
News Alabama GOP Officials Giving Roy Moore A Pass O... Nov 16 Groper Joe In Ala... 9
News The Latest: Strange says a write-in bid 'highly... Nov 15 Bryan Fischer s H... 4
News SNL's Roy Moore sketch is one big joke about Al... Nov 15 Cosby 8
News Democrats come close to retaking Virginia House Nov 8 USA Today 1
More from around the web