Jobless rate at 3-year low as payroll...

Jobless rate at 3-year low as payrolls surge

There are 905 comments on the Reuters story from Feb 3, 2012, titled Jobless rate at 3-year low as payrolls surge. In it, Reuters reports that:

The United States created jobs at the fastest pace in nine months in January and the unemployment rate unexpectedly dropped to a near three-year low, giving a boost to President Barack Obama.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#956 Mar 18, 2012
Awwwww, you trying to be cute.
.
"the reference a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe and some Air Jordan's" was supposed to mean what?
.
.
YOU FAILED.
Kenny wrote:
<quoted text>
Who said anything about race?

“Liberal Teachers ruin Kids”

Since: Mar 09

Paradise Valley Arizona

#957 Mar 18, 2012
It would appear that now 66% of all Americans intend to give Obama the boot in NOV
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#959 Mar 18, 2012
Obama will be re-elected because NO GOP is challenging him.
.
and John McCain is NOT running, Christie is too fat and the list goes on.
Vance1 wrote:
It would appear that now 66% of all Americans intend to give Obama the boot in NOV
grinder

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#961 Mar 19, 2012
Even though the Democrats KNOW that everything is worse under Obama, they are HAPPY to have the national dialog focus on something as petty as Rush vs. Maher's insults.

Let's continue to hold out hope that these liberals will come to realize that the problems Obama is bring on our country also hurt their families too. It is their kids that will work for months for the government to pay taxes before they earn any money for themselves. It is their grand-parents whose retirement savings is evaporating with the devaluation of the dollar. It is their parents who need to have less romantic dinners out so tha they can adjust for the rising cost of gas and food in their budgets. It is their friends who are being laid off as businesses need to control expenses for the shrinking economy and higher costs of regulation.

Ohhh-bama, Owebama, it is painful to watch him and his minions destroy our great country.
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#962 Mar 19, 2012
And in 2004 GW Bush said WE have to deal with real threats, like the invisable WMD's in IRAQ. He was busy, busy looking for the WMD at 'the' ranch.
grinder wrote:
Even though the Democrats KNOW that everything is worse under Obama, they are HAPPY to have the national dialog focus on something as petty as Rush vs. Maher's insults.
Let's continue to hold out hope that these liberals will come to realize that the problems Obama is bring on our country also hurt their families too. It is their kids that will work for months for the government to pay taxes before they earn any money for themselves. It is their grand-parents whose retirement savings is evaporating with the devaluation of the dollar. It is their parents who need to have less romantic dinners out so tha they can adjust for the rising cost of gas and food in their budgets. It is their friends who are being laid off as businesses need to control expenses for the shrinking economy and higher costs of regulation.
Ohhh-bama, Owebama, it is painful to watch him and his minions destroy our great country.
grinder

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#963 Mar 19, 2012
Dingo wrote:
And in 2004 GW Bush said WE have to deal with real threats, like the invisable WMD's in IRAQ. He was busy, busy looking for the WMD at 'the' ranch.
<quoted text>
Saddam killed over 100,000 Kurds prior to our attack. That qualifies as WMD.

Plus the DEMOCRATS said the same thing! It was their vote that cleared the way for the war. Seems you only recall information that supports your opinions.

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#964 Mar 20, 2012
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Saddam killed over 100,000 Kurds prior to our attack. That qualifies as WMD.
Plus the DEMOCRATS said the same thing! It was their vote that cleared the way for the war. Seems you only recall information that supports your opinions.
No....trying to equate Saddam's Tyranny with WMD is just an excuse for Bush being wrong and a liar!

The only reason Dems and ANYONE voted to go to WAR, was because they trusted their president, and didn't expect he'd lead them into a war under false pretenses.

Oh, and here is Bush ADMITTING that there were NO WMD...so your argument is moot!

Bush Admits they DID NOT have WMD!...in his own words:


So why are you arguing something he has already admitted there were none????

lol..

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#965 Mar 20, 2012
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Saddam killed over 100,000 Kurds prior to our attack. That qualifies as WMD.
No it doesn't!

Tyranny = Saddam killing Kurds.

WMD = WMD
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Plus the DEMOCRATS said the same thing!.
No they didn't!
They simply believed their president, and let him LEAD us.....little did they know he was lying:)

So you can't blame those who merely believed our leader and Cheif, or hold them responsible.....

The buck stops with Bush!
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>! It was their vote that cleared the way for the war.
...because they trusted that the PRESIDENT wasn't LYING, or trying to trick us into a was for personal gain and false pretenses.

The fault lies on the DEMS for trusting Bush!...not for the WMD lie:)
grinder wrote:
<quoted text> Seems you only recall information that supports your opinions.
....pot meet kettle!

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#966 Mar 20, 2012
grinder wrote:
Even though the Democrats KNOW that everything is worse under Obama, they are HAPPY to have the national dialog focus on something as petty as Rush vs. Maher's insults.
Let's continue to hold out hope that these liberals will come to realize that the problems Obama is bring on our country also hurt their families too. It is their kids that will work for months for the government to pay taxes before they earn any money for themselves. It is their grand-parents whose retirement savings is evaporating with the devaluation of the dollar. It is their parents who need to have less romantic dinners out so tha they can adjust for the rising cost of gas and food in their budgets. It is their friends who are being laid off as businesses need to control expenses for the shrinking economy and higher costs of regulation.
Ohhh-bama, Owebama, it is painful to watch him and his minions destroy our great country.
How is everything worse under Obama?

Everything is improving from the Bush recession.....He saved the US from economic collapse, he saved the auto industry, stock market UP, DOW up, Jobless rate down, saved many people from losing their homes, highest oil production in years, unemployment getting better not worse, and that little Bin Laden thing!

We are moving in the right direction...can you explain what's getting worse?

I bet you would like it if it was worse,, merely to sooth your own ego, and make Obama look bad.

You'd be willing to sacrifice your own country to be "right"....pathetic!

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#967 Mar 20, 2012
Kenny wrote:
a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democratic for a lifetime.
....if you are denying this was a comment with a racist undertone, you're an idiot!

...the only thing you left out is fried chicken and watermelon!

At least be honest...if you feel that way own it!

Don't be chicken sh!t and try to claim it had nothing to do with race:)

Don't be scared, own your true feelings!
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#968 Mar 20, 2012
Who gives a flying flowke? was it worth 4,500 DEAD American Troops?
.
Iraq killed 10's of thousands Iranians, Iran in turn killed thousands of Iraqi's.
.
STOP trying to mixed apples to pink unicorns.
.
and MORON, the chief reason GW Bush said was to rid Saddam of WMD's when that lie didn't work, they started upon another fuckery how he killed his own people.
.
WE have been supporting dictators since 1976, even reagan was supporting Saddam with the war they were fighting with IRAN.
.
So, was 4,500 dead Americans worth that debacle in IRAQ?
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Saddam killed over 100,000 Kurds prior to our attack. That qualifies as WMD.
Plus the DEMOCRATS said the same thing! It was their vote that cleared the way for the war. Seems you only recall information that supports your opinions.
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#969 Mar 20, 2012
Up Vote for you Snow Bunny.
.
.
REASON; keeping it real.
.
Snow Bunny_ wrote:
<quoted text>
How is everything worse under Obama?
Everything is improving from the Bush recession.....He saved the US from economic collapse, he saved the auto industry, stock market UP, DOW up, Jobless rate down, saved many people from losing their homes, highest oil production in years, unemployment getting better not worse, and that little Bin Laden thing!
We are moving in the right direction...can you explain what's getting worse?
I bet you would like it if it was worse,, merely to sooth your own ego, and make Obama look bad.
You'd be willing to sacrifice your own country to be "right"....pathetic!
grinder

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#970 Mar 20, 2012
Snow Bunny_ wrote:
<quoted text>No it doesn't!
Tyranny = Saddam killing Kurds.
WMD = WMD
<quoted text>No they didn't!
They simply believed their president, and let him LEAD us.....little did they know he was lying:)
So you can't blame those who merely believed our leader and Cheif, or hold them responsible.....
The buck stops with Bush!
<quoted text>
...because they trusted that the PRESIDENT wasn't LYING, or trying to trick us into a was for personal gain and false pretenses.
The fault lies on the DEMS for trusting Bush!...not for the WMD lie:)
<quoted text>....pot meet kettle!
Wow! You really bought the whole liberal/democratic spin on the whole thing - hook, line and sinker!

Do you have any explanation for why most of the other foreign countries had the same intel? Were issuing the same conclusions? Or why was our own military saying the same thing? Hmmm? They were all under Bush's spell too? lol

And isn't the purpose of a vote to allow people to vote their view?
grinder

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#971 Mar 20, 2012
Snow Bunny_ wrote:
<quoted text>
How is everything worse under Obama?
Everything is improving from the Bush recession.....He saved the US from economic collapse, he saved the auto industry, stock market UP, DOW up, Jobless rate down, saved many people from losing their homes, highest oil production in years, unemployment getting better not worse, and that little Bin Laden thing!
We are moving in the right direction...can you explain what's getting worse?
I bet you would like it if it was worse,, merely to sooth your own ego, and make Obama look bad.
You'd be willing to sacrifice your own country to be "right"....pathetic!
Another person who readily accepts that good leadership is demonstrated by "things" that did not happen and "events" that can never be proved or contested.

Because of Obama, the Aliens still have not destroyed the earth. Can the Republicans say the same? well? can they? NO!

Sure... Owebama, Rham and the rest toast to their lemming faithful over prime rib and lobster.
grinder

Fort Lauderdale, FL

#972 Mar 20, 2012
Dingo wrote:
Who gives a flying flowke? was it worth 4,500 DEAD American Troops?
.
Iraq killed 10's of thousands Iranians, Iran in turn killed thousands of Iraqi's.
.
STOP trying to mixed apples to pink unicorns.
.
and MORON, the chief reason GW Bush said was to rid Saddam of WMD's when that lie didn't work, they started upon another fuckery how he killed his own people.
.
WE have been supporting dictators since 1976, even reagan was supporting Saddam with the war they were fighting with IRAN.
.
So, was 4,500 dead Americans worth that debacle in IRAQ?
<quoted text>
Yeah, keep denying. We knew these Kurds were gased even before we invaded.

And why did Obama launch cruise missiles in Libya again? How many innocent were killed there? Or perhaps you will deny that... after all he is a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#974 Mar 21, 2012
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! You really bought the whole liberal/democratic spin on the whole thing - hook, line and sinker!
Nope, I simply do my research, and I know how to do math...and the numbers can't be disputed:)

It is "you" that hopes the repub propaganda is true...but over and over again, it is proven false.

You will never be able to prove what I posted is false:)
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have any explanation for why most of the other foreign countries had the same intel?
I don't care about other countries!
I care about THIS country...and the facts are BUSH was president, he led us into a war based on a LIE and faulty "intel".....and caused the death of many of our OWN boys, girls, men, women, and not to mention all thew innocent people in Iraq.
I would have to say that they believed and followed Bush...the idiot aka republican.
grinder wrote:
<quoted text> Or why was our own military saying the same thing?
The Buck stops with Bush:) The military was sent on ORDERS...they really have no say.
His special Intelligence and Bush had REASON to gain from a war with Iraq.
He was the president.
The pen in HAND, to START a war was signed by HIM!
...and he did it...and he was wrong, and he almost destroyed this country.
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
They were all under Bush's spell too? lol
Military has to (no choice) follow orders...how do you not know that?
There doesn't have to be a "spell"....they get orders, they HAVE to follow, whether they agree or disagree.
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
And isn't the purpose of a vote to allow people to vote their view?
...vote?
The military didn't vote for the war.
The people and citizens of the US didn't vote for the war.
Congress, and the PRESIDENT have ALL the power....they are the only vote when it comes to war.

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#975 Mar 21, 2012
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Another person who readily accepts that good leadership is demonstrated by "things" that did not happen and "events" that can never be proved or contested.
Because of Obama, the Aliens still have not destroyed the earth. Can the Republicans say the same? well? can they? NO!
Sure... Owebama, Rham and the rest toast to their lemming faithful over prime rib and lobster.
This really makes you look desperate!

If what you write is true, when why not dispute it?
Prove otherwise???

NOPE...you simply say it's "wrong"...and then throw out some comment about aliens:)

1. Are you saying the economy getting better is NOT happening?
Is it a big conspiracy by economists (repub and dem), Bureau Of Statistics, and all the other studies?
LOL....right:)

2. Are you saying the Auto industry was not saved? That didn't happen? Really?

3. Are you saying we DID not go from a RECESSION to OUT of the recession?
Is that a conspiracy as well? Dated back to when Bush was in office? All to make Obama look good in 2012, because the recession ends?
lol...riiiiiiiiiight.

4. Are you saying the Stock and DOW being UP is NOT happening?
Do you know how many PEOPLE would have to be involved in that conspiracy reagarding stock , and dow, etc??????
That would take people around the world, repubs, dems, and business owner to "fudge" the entire economy to make Obama look a little "good"....lol
Are you drunk?

5.....oh, and are you saying that The Death Of Bin Laden did NOT happen?
LOL...you are SO pathetically desperate:)

“Imaginez tous les gens”

Since: Sep 09

Sunbury, OH

#976 Mar 21, 2012
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, keep denying. We knew these Kurds were gased even before we invaded.
And why did Obama launch cruise missiles in Libya again? How many innocent were killed there? Or perhaps you will deny that... after all he is a Nobel Peace Prize winner.
Do you ever research current events...or even know whats going on around you?

The repubs were demanding it!

FYI...it was an INTERNATIONAL MIssion:)

Here's some light reading, educate yourself, and get back to me on WHY you think it is wrong of 'Obama":
All Target's Hit!
"More than 112 Tomahawk cruise missiles struck over 20 targets inside Libya today in the opening phase of an international military operation the Pentagon said was aimed at stopping attacks led by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and enforcing a U.N.-backed no-fly zone.

President Obama, speaking from Brazil shortly after he authorized the missile attacks, said they were part of a "limited military action" to protect the Libyan people.

"I want the American people to know that the use of force is not our first choice and it's not a choice I make lightly," Obama said. "But we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy"

"hey targeted Libyan air defense missile sites, early warning radar and key communications facilities around Tripoli, Misratah, and Surt, but no areas east of that or near Benghazi. Because of darkness over Libya, Gortney said it was too early to determine the strikes' effectiveness."
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#977 Mar 21, 2012
WRONG again you koolaid drinker.
.
Cheney cherry picked the intel to suit his and GW Bush's Agenda.
.
.
most of the other foreign countries had the same intel?
Which other Foreign Country? and don't mention England and Tony Blair, Blair was just a puppet used by GW Bush.
.
List them?
.
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow! You really bought the whole liberal/democratic spin on the whole thing - hook, line and sinker!
Do you have any explanation for why most of the other foreign countries had the same intel? Were issuing the same conclusions? Or why was our own military saying the same thing? Hmmm? They were all under Bush's spell too? lol
And isn't the purpose of a vote to allow people to vote their view?
Dingo

Sacramento, CA

#978 Mar 21, 2012
We knew these Kurds were gased
ok, why didn't Senior Bush invaded? the gassing happened in 1988 under his watch.
and like I said I don't give a blasted flowke if mooslims gassed each other, was it worth 4,500 Dead American Troops?
.
Obama launched Cruise missiles, sure he did, but NO Ground Troops.
.
and if you gonna flapp your ignorant gums about civilian caualties, put it into perspective with that debacle in 2003 under GW Bush,'Remember the shock and Awe"
.
grinder wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, keep denying. We knew these Kurds were gased even before we invaded.
And why did Obama launch cruise missiles in Libya again? How many innocent were killed there? Or perhaps you will deny that... after all he is a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Reuters Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Dozens of police departments are seeking expand... Nov 27 tomin cali 1
News Paul Ryan opens door to delayed corporate tax r... Nov '17 America Bogus Eco... 5
News Pence to go to Capitol Hill as lawmakers work o... Nov '17 Trumpsajoke 4
News The Numbers Show Just How Strong Trump Has Been... Sep '17 tomin cali 4
News Wells Fargo sued over rate-lock extension fees Sep '17 corp crime report 4
News Lawyer says client attended Trump Jr meeting wi... Aug '17 C Kersey 19
News INSIGHT-Globalization's castaways haunt central... Aug '17 Winning 10
More from around the web