I know, but Ross doesn't say HE'D make the changes either.<quoted text>
Yes, but none of our current leaders have the balls or desire to do either. Personally I am on the cut spending side of that fence.
Perot launches Web site about government spending
- Posted in the Perot Sys Forum
Comments (Page 2)
|
Joined: Jun 13, 2008
Comments: 113
|
|
|
Judged:
1
1 At least he wouldn't have Dan Q. as a VP. |
|
You all had your chance years ago and you blew it. Things would be a lot different today if Ross won back then. |
|
|
Joined: May 5, 2008
Comments: 365
St Paul
ISP Location:
United States
|
Mr. Perot,
How long will it be before you close your website, citing a conspiracy against it? |
|
Judged:
1
1
1 Ross could have saved a buck and just linked here: http://www.cagw.org/site/PageServer |
|
Its a far site better than what the Obama Man and McCain have to offer us! |
|
How so? McCain's and Obama's sites offer their plans with quick details about the changes they'd make, Perot's lists 4 things he hopes someone else will do. |
|
And besides, that is the pure beauty of Ross. He actually does whgat he says, plain and simple. Bush, Clinton, Obama, McCain, they are a bunch of lousy politicans, and by definition, are actually required to lie and cheat. plain and simple. Need I say more? Ross for Boss!! |
|
|
Joined: May 28, 2008
Comments: 50
|
It's easy to say that you will balance the budget, but Ross has never had to make a decision with millions of lobbyist pleading their cases at his doorstep. Plus, the CEO of a company is not responsible to the general public, he's responsible to shareholders and they only care about one thing.
While I don't think that the message on Ross' page is common knowledge, it's definitely not a new message. Clinton accomplished a lot toward balancing the budget. Bush has gone the opposite direction, and I'm not blaming or praising either of them, but the presidents and congress are well aware of this situation. The problem comes when you start making hard decisions, you start pissing people off and then you hear it from them. It makes you start questioning whether it's the right decision or not because "the people" don't support it. I guarantee that Ross Perot will never get elected and even if he did, he would never have as much impact on the budget as he promises. |
Just thousands of blood-thirsty vendors at his door step. So whats the difference? if you don't listen to em, and if you owe them nothing, they go off to try and get those pure "politicans" to listen to em. Plain and simple! Is it glamorous? No! Does it get the media whores foaming at the mouths, for their media shows? No. But is sure works! Plain and simple! Ross for Boss!! |
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staying behind the curve | Oct 9 | Mike Church | 12 |
| Historically, VP debates have little effect on ... | Oct 3 | Up-Chuck for VP | 2 |
| Katie, Barr (and Nader) the door | Sep 26 | true debate | 1 |
| The call for change | Sep 24 | Disgusted | 1 |
| Stephen C. Smith: Open up the presidential debates | Sep 23 | Ron Ralph | 11 |
| A senior moment? | Sep '08 | kyle | 16 |
| Aug. 16 49er | Aug '08 | liberals and... | 15 |
