In it for the Money!
Posted in the Monsanto Forum
#1 Jan 5, 2011
It all started by the government giving blanket approval to the "Frankenstein" tomato. You see, by 1994, the government made a stunning decision, one that reeks of something foul. They decided that since the Flavr Savr® performed "so well in its tests" that its results would stand for any further GMO produce. Because of that, no further testing would be required before presenting it to consumers for consumption.6
The FDA suppressed a report that described lesions being created in the stomachs of mice that had eaten the Flavr Savr®. As a matter of fact, "Seven out of forty rats tested died within two weeks for unstated reasons."8
Are there fees that farmers will have to pay to grow GMO crops?
Genetically Modified Foods are now being marketed as the crops of the future. You can have everything you want in produce, meat and milk, and they can make it happen. Don't doubt the economic gain that these agro-chemical companies are seeking.
The following two plans are under development by Monsanto of the US, and AstraZeneca of Britain. They fall under the trait-specific technology, called Genetic Use Restriction Technology (T-GURT).
"Technology Protection," is how they sell it. "Terminator" technology makes plants that would produce sterile seeds after one season. This means, farmers have to buy more seeds for the next harvest.
"Traitor" technology is a trait-specific technology that develops traits which would remain dormant in crops. Farmers can choose to activate this trait by spraying their crops with a proprietary chemical compound. This means, they'll have to buy the proprietary compound to treat their crops in order to activate it. There are even biochemical companies requiring farmers to sign agreements to not save any of their seeds for re-planting. This means that instead of using the seeds for the next planting season, they have to get rid of them and buy more seeds.
Why would business and the government do something like this?
The USDA, Monsanto and AstraZeneca, have contrived a way to make money on two fronts: First they make money on gene modification. Second, they make money because farmers have to pay them annually to continue to grow crops. It's apparently dollars and cents all the way, no sense of human protection involved. The USDA is actually in business with Monsanto in owning some of the genetic engineering technology patents.
Add your comments below
|Bayer verkoopt onderdeel.||Jun 19||pardon||1|
|Baas Bayer||May 29||pardon||1|
|Monsanto CEO Hugh Grant insists Roundup is safe...||Apr '16||Say no to GMOs||1|
|GMO critics protest at Monsanto meeting; resolu... (Jan '14)||Jul '15||holmes beeeach||10|
|Consolidation in seed industry could pressure D... (May '15)||May '15||Sterkfontein Swar...||2|
|Organic Consumers Association: Divest Monsanto ... (May '14)||May '15||Tomas_W||2|
Find what you want!
Search Monsanto Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC