Vioxx blameless in patient's death: jury

Vioxx blameless in patient's death: jury

There are 1 comment on the CNN story from Mar 27, 2007, titled Vioxx blameless in patient's death: jury. In it, CNN reports that:

An Illinois jury Tuesday found Merck & Co. Inc.'s withdrawn arthritis drug Vioxx did not cause a 52-year-old woman's fatal heart attack and awarded no damages in the case.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CNN.

lily

United States

#1 Mar 31, 2007
Victims of the pharmaceutical company Merck:
Are you, or one of your love ones next? If they are not made accountable you can count on it!

Please copy – past and send this as a e-mail to very one you know, word of e-mail like word of mouth is very powerful, ask them to keep it going for the victims that can’t get justice in our courts.

FACTS:
New England Journal of Medicine reaffirms that Merck lied about Vioxx safety
Three top scientists in the world Gregory D. Curfman, M.D., Stephen Morrissey, Ph.D., and Jeffrey M. Drazen, M.D. are taking on Merck that has the reputation of destroying the career of anyone who has ever questioned the safety of Vioxx - a drug that has killed as many as 60,000 Americans, according to the FDA.

FACTS:
Dr. Eric Topol, chairman of the cardiovascular medicine department at the Cleveland Clinic, is one of the top heart doctors in the world. He also happens to be the one of those rare American doctors who is not in bed with the pharmaceutical companies.

Dr. Topol also made another important point that shows how Merck is not disclosing the facts. According to him, Vioxx can be lethal any time after a patient starts to take the drug.
He also blasted Merck’s argument that the company knew about the risks of the drug only in September 2004 when it decided to recall it. Dr. Topol thinks that the risks were known as early as 1999.

FACT:
Merck relentlessly continued its ongoing attack on Vioxx victims. In a series of statements released yesterday by the firm, Merck is treating Vioxx victims as if they are the ones who have done something wrong. Forget about even a word of apology for the deaths and injuries or even a mention of the pain caused to those who consumed its product. On the other hand, the management team of Merck went on an all-out attack against Vioxx lawyers and victims and proclaimed that it was ready to fight anyone who ends up in court with a Vioxx lawsuit.

Fact
Lot of documents have emerged that show that not only did Merck knew about the dangerous side effects of Vioxx as early as 2000, the company also hid these from the public and the FDA

Lily
LV. NV

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

McKesson Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Q1 2016 EPS Estimates for McKesson Co. (MCK) De... (Jan '16) Jan '16 Syntax Error 1
News 29 states settle Medicaid Rx drug overpayment case (Jul '12) Mar '13 Johnny boy 2
News Pitting Us Against Each Other (Oct '11) Oct '11 Niedermire 1
News Weekly Top Insider Sells: GOOG, MAR, MCK, KO (Oct '10) Oct '10 Jermias Roberth 1
News First swine flu shots shipped (Sep '09) Sep '09 Scared by Big Pharma 4
News McKesson completes Per-Se deal (Mar '07) Jun '09 Sunlite_Or 2
News McKesson technology executive Pamela Pure depar... (Apr '09) May '09 ric 2
More from around the web