Martha Stewart ruling: What it means ...

Martha Stewart ruling: What it means for Macy's

There are 2 comments on the Christian Science Monitor story from Apr 11, 2013, titled Martha Stewart ruling: What it means for Macy's. In it, Christian Science Monitor reports that:

Martha Stewart departs the New York state Supreme Court after testifying, March 5. Macy's claims that Martha Stewart violated her exclusive contract with them when her company designed products for JC Penney.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Christian Science Monitor.

What good is a contract

Hampton, VA

#1 Apr 12, 2013
Means I am not doing business with JCP, I have a choice where I buy things and that old bat and JCPs behavior is something I am not supporting. This is clearly wordsmithing,. I didn't buy Stewart's crap at Kmart, not going to buy it with or without the label, is a good thing. I am supporting Macy's.
Boobie Flattery

Oshkosh, WI

#2 Apr 12, 2013
Nice beasts!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

JC Penney Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Icaps vanished Sun Bx baby 1
Employee Handbook Sun Associate 3
News J.C. Penney Announces Accelerated Expansion Int... Apr 21 HOWSthat 15
Customer Service with No Employees Apr 21 HOWSthis 29
Why am I receiving a failure to report ? Apr 20 HOWSthat 4
Cheating to get Icaps Apr 16 Anomaly202 12
Incorrect signing and replenishment Apr 15 Yes same thing 2
More from around the web