Comments
|
I've got two servers a x235 and an x3400 series with the IBM. A strange thing happens, I can access the x3400 remotely but the x235 gives me an error that I can't connect on the cards 192.168.x.x address. This is strange as I would've expected a reference to the Internet address of firewall.
If I'm connected via VPN this works fine, however the x235 is the vpn server. Has anyone seen this issue? It's also extremely frustrating that results will vary based on the client version of JAVA. |
||||
|
I have verified my firewall is working properly by reconfiguring the 2 RSA IIs to mimic each other. Again, the x3400 works fine running on the previous configuration used for the x235.
I've even gone as far as running wireshark which shows that my workstation is trying to communicate with the 192.168.x.x address on the expected port. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| maxidex dexamethasone warning | Dec 20 | WEL | 1 |
| IBM to Turn Iowa Town Into `Smart City' as It S... | Nov '09 | Jack Dunwoody | 2 |
| Highwoods says IBM move good for both properties | Nov '09 | RoboBlogger ... | 1 |
| IBM to open center in Dubuque, create 1,300 jobs (Jan '09) | Nov '09 | Jack Dunwoody | 6 |
| vga driver for netvista 6881 (Sep '07) | Nov '09 | aaa | 5 |
| IBM in talks to buy Sun Microsystems | Sep '09 | John mclaughlin | 1 |
| IBM Earns Top Ranking in Global Application Out... | Aug '09 | jennyt69 | 1 |