Blue Shield of California won't cover breast cancer drug Avastin

There are 3 comments on the Inside Bay Area story from Oct 10, 2011, titled Blue Shield of California won't cover breast cancer drug Avastin. In it, Inside Bay Area reports that:

For the past two-and-a-half years, Terry Kalley's wife has battled breast cancer with Avastin, the world's bestselling cancer drug.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Inside Bay Area.

Checkpoint3

Berkeley, CA

#1 Oct 10, 2011
Medical marijuana is the answer thats why our bright lawmakers passed the law authorizing its use when prescribed by a licensed physician. Advocates claim it is the medicine of the future with the side benefit of recreational highs. What does she have to lose, yet it may prove to be the only cure that will help. Go for it!
Ronald

Westminster, CA

#2 Oct 10, 2011
Checkpoint3 wrote:
Medical marijuana is the answer thats why our bright lawmakers passed the law authorizing its use when prescribed by a licensed physician. Advocates claim it is the medicine of the future with the side benefit of recreational highs. What does she have to lose, yet it may prove to be the only cure that will help. Go for it!
Checkpoint3.

Actually, there is no such thing as "medical" Marijuana. In fact, "medical" Marijuana is a carcinogen that can increase suffering by causing cancer.

During the 60s 70s revolution, the druggie revolutionaries *(now in power)* dreamed of being supplied "free pot", the cost of which would be paid by the hard working "drug-free" taxpaying minority. Following the revolution, the druggies went on to seize academia at all levels - including high Government teaching positions at the elementary and secondary levels, the fat-cat holders of which are sucking from the public teat.

The really hard core revolutionary druggies went on to occupy high paid taxpayer funded positions at the Government controlled university level. Among their many schemes designed to "get back" at normal society was their associating mind rotting pot with Government provided and controlled, taxpayer funded, medical "care". The Orwellian NEWSPEAK they created to achieve this end was "medical" Marijuana.

Americans tend to view "works in progress" as the finished product, but we can expect the next argument the revolutionary druggies make will be that they should be provided taxpayer funded Government administered "free pot" because of their "medical condition".

Source: http://goo.gl/O9cCM

Source: http://goo.gl/afwcz

Source: http://goo.gl/Xlzhi

Source: http://goo.gl/xnWvk

Ronald
Checkpoint3

Berkeley, CA

#3 Oct 10, 2011
Well, like it or not it is now a household term and used by the media.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Genentech Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
What gives Feb '15 Bookrep 1
News Company seeks approval for skin cancer drug Jan '15 Cathy Smith 1
News UCSF geneticist joins Google's Calico project (Apr '14) Apr '14 Guest 1
Zelboraf Ripoff of Melanoma Patients (Nov '11) Nov '13 Ye li 4
News Tarceva meets goal in first-line lung cancer trial (Nov '08) Nov '13 Avi 5
News Studies: Avastin may fight early breast cancers (Mar '12) Sep '13 Sabastian 2
News Questions Swirl Around Avastin (Jun '09) Sep '13 Jesus 2
More from around the web