Your town. Your news. Your take.

Local News: Los Angeles, CA 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

 
Advertisment
Freddie Mac

Jul 23, 2008

Bush Drops Opposition to Housing Bill

President Bush dropped his opposition Wednesday to legislation aiming to calm the chaotic housing market despite his objections to a $3.9 billion provision.

Read All 10 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10
Wake up FQQLZ

Jerseyville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 23, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bush needs to be "dropped" on his head again.

“Play Nice”

Joined: Nov 27, 2007

Comments: 3610

Orlando, Florida

ISP: Atlanta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jul 23, 2008
 
Here ye, here ye... all American taxpayers. Put hand in pocket, take out wallet, remove money, give to government.

Someone explain to me how this country is going to ever come close to paying off all the money that has been doled out over the last 8 years.

Joined: Jul 17, 2008

Comments: 145

Oakland Park, FL

ISP: Waukesha, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jul 23, 2008
 
Once again we are trying to legislate against stupidity, when they should have had laws in place to prevent greedy bankers from making lons to people that had no business buying a home. As far as I am concenred they should let it all colapse. Instead the middle class will once again have to flip the bill for their failure to act proactivly.
OMG

Lyndhurst, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jul 23, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

how come republicans aren't calling bush a flip-flopper?
john k

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jul 23, 2008
 
i'm still waiting to see who is going to jail over this.

Joined: Jul 17, 2007

Comments: 5006

Wyoming

ISP: Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jul 23, 2008
 
let's see 3.9 billion for the American people 28.9 billion for corporate fannies and freddies. Damn seems fair to me - why fight over a veto?
Lance Winslow

Newark, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jul 23, 2008
 
wyojake wrote:
let's see 3.9 billion for the American people 28.9 billion for corporate fannies and freddies. Damn seems fair to me - why fight over a veto?
Try $400 billion plus for the Wall Street bros.
And the legislation raises the national debt $800 billion which would buy out the loss of $200K equity of four million US homes...pretty much all of them at risk of default, if the money were spent on taxpayers rather than corporations.
leo from shanghai

Warrensburg, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Jul 23, 2008
 
story out of detroit that home that sold for $110,000.00 three years ago could not get a bid of $5,000.00 at foreclosure auction. the government should buy these homs at 5 cents on the dollar and GIVE the homes people scammed by boiler room tactics and let big lenders drop dead!

Joined: Jul 17, 2007

Comments: 5006

Wyoming

ISP: Saint Louis, MO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Jul 24, 2008
 
Lance Winslow wrote:
<quoted text>Try $400 billion plus for the Wall Street bros.
And the legislation raises the national debt $800 billion which would buy out the loss of $200K equity of four million US homes...pretty much all of them at risk of default, if the money were spent on taxpayers rather than corporations.
failed attempt at sarcasm my friend. We in a "Republican" free market are supposed to let these outfits fail. Tired of bailouts for these stooges and cronies. Think I would rather the corporations took the hit than add 800 billion more to the deficit in additional business welfare. I also would rather the money be spent on taxpayers.
Country Club Hills Man

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Jul 30, 2008
 
FL_Native wrote:
Once again we are trying to legislate against stupidity, when they should have had laws in place to prevent greedy bankers from making lons to people that had no business buying a home. As far as I am concenred they should let it all colapse. Instead the middle class will once again have to flip the bill for their failure to act proactivly.
All that talk about how the banks screwed the people. Most of those loans were backed by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae that let this happen. People were buying homes that they had no business buying and couldn't afford it at a fixed rate. These people that we tax payers are bailing out will still not pay their house payments. This bill is just promoting irresponsible people to take advantage of the government. I see all of these people in Country Club Hill, Il. living in $600,000 homes that are straight from the projects. They don't cut their grass, they use newspaper to cover their windows, and most don't have jobs. If the government wants to give hand-outs to these people, why not put them in a house they can afford. About 50% of these new homes in Country Club Hills, Il. are all in foreclusure.
Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Freddie Mac Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Where is the government bailout for homeowners? Nov 11 martin 5
Obama: Middle-class tax cuts a 'priority' Oct 28 tiffany redding 1
Zeroing In on Prospects for the Next Bull Market Oct 24 Bob Lee 1
Freddie Mac Secretly Paid Lobbyist To KO Bill Oct 22 the truth 16
Mortgage firm arranged stealth campaign Oct 20 ChicoPride 6
Freddie Mac Prices $1 Billion Reopening of 4.12... Oct '08 BAN Derivatives 1
Mortgage rates drop below 6% Oct '08 West Valley ... 2
Related Topix Forums: US Politics, George Bush, Home, Mortgage, Financial Services, Foreclosures, Fannie Mae