Rochester Wasn't Eastman Kodak's Fatal Problem

Jan 17, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Wall Street Journal

I beg to differ with Rich Karlgaard's "Kodak Didn't Kill Rochester; It Was the Other Way Around" . Rochester has always been an entrepreneurial locale dating to the days of the construction of the Erie Canal.

Comments
1 - 2 of 2 Comments Last updated Jan 23, 2012

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 18, 2012
 
James wrote:
Whites in the burbs killed Kodak.
Ahh,there is nothing like a racist troll in the A.M. Grow up and get a life.What killed Kodak was their CEO who happens to be Hispanic idiot.
meeee

Rochester, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 23, 2012
 
lol

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••