Exelon's 'Nuclear Guy': No New Nukes
Mar 29, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Forbes.com
Nuclear power is no longer an economically viable source of new energy in the United States, the freshly-retired CEO of Exelon , America's largest producer of nuclear power, said in Chicago Thursday.
#1 Mar 31, 2012
At best, Rowe is guilty of bad form for his school-yard comments about ComEd's Ayers.
What kind of limited leadership does it take to engage in the historical, volitile, short term economics of natural gas?
The nation deserves better. Fortunately, Obama has the foresight to look beyond the self serving interests and limited thinking reflected in Rowe's comments.
#2 Mar 31, 2012
30 US$/MWh * 1200 MW = 36,000 US$/hr.
300 million US$ per reactor, per year.
Not economically viable? My behind. Rather say US plutokrats want to milk the hydrocarbon cash cow for all its worth.
Add your comments below
|Irish envoy joins call for immigration reform (Feb '14)||Feb '14||wild child||8|
|Few nuclear shutdowns to cap fuel prices (Sep '13)||Sep '13||BDV||1|
|Nuclear Industry Withers in U.S. as Wind Pummel... (Mar '13)||Mar '13||ioconnor||1|
|The energy 'regulatory climate' is changing too (Feb '13)||Feb '13||Bernard Forand||9|
|Exelon to update earthquake risk at nuclear plants (Feb '12)||Feb '12||Sonic Booms||1|
|Reactor shuts down, releases steam at Illinois ... (Jan '12)||Jan '12||Magic UndergarMitt||3|
|Exelon to Provide Nuclear Advice to China (Nov '11)||Nov '11||Pug||3|
Find what you want!
Search Exelon Forum Now