Greenpeace says beware of Enexus

Full story: Brattleboro Reformer

Despite the Department of Public Service's assertion that recent concessions made by Entergy will benefit Vermont ratepayers, the company's plan to spin off Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant into a new subsidiary is bad news for the Green Mountain State.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18
flat lander

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Oct 12, 2009
 
IS THIS GREENPEACE'S TWO CENTS WORTH. SO THIS IS MINE. how stupid do you have to prove to get in this club BAND OF IDIOTS.
Whit

Randolph, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Oct 12, 2009
 
Surely we can trust the federal government to be as responsible a regulator of the nuclear industry as they have proved to be of the banks and Wall Street.

Still, this article is written more as a Greenpeace advertisement than genuine reportage. Not that I don't tend to agree, but couldn't you have found someone to argue the affirmative on the good of the spin off?
Go Pats

Jeffersonville, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Oct 12, 2009
 
We need nuclear power, but I won't pretend to believe that Enexus isn't anything more than business decision that will benefit the business. We need to ask ourselves if Vermont needs or wants business in the state. If we want business then fine, just keep them to existing law. If we don't want business (zero growth) then fine, close the doors to all. We need to stop picking and choosing like hens looking for the tastiest bugs in the garden. It can't be legal to create new exclusionary laws for ants while at the same time subsidizing butterflys.
TNB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Oct 12, 2009
 
I guess Entergy should develop strategies to HURT their shareholders?? What a flimsy, one sided piece of trash article....
kb richard

Burlington, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Good article Thanks
SAK

Merrimack, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Oct 12, 2009
 
Once again, the corporate world is going to put the screws to the public in general.
The shareholders and upper management will profit mightily from this but, those of us who will pay for it will get little except for soaring bills, lousy service, messing up the environment even more, and pleas for "understanding the plight of the newly formed entity".
All one has to do is check out the mess that Fairpoint is in. Another gov't bailout coming up I'm sure. Ever wonder whose palms get greased to in order to have these things happen?
HDI

Barre, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Oct 12, 2009
 
Like Verizons spin-off of our phone service to Fairpoint this is just a way of sucking the capital out of the business. Entergy realizes Vermont Yankee is at the end of it's working life and wants out. I don't understand how the DPS could approve this, but I didn't understand how they approved the Fairpoint deal either.
Take the money and run, this is the guiding principal of management today.
Go Pats

Montpelier, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Oct 12, 2009
 
It's good comedy to see the anti-everything group attempt to tie Verizon and Entergy up into one neat package. Throw everything out there and see what sticks.
Gloria

Montpelier, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Oct 12, 2009
 
TNB wrote:
I guess Entergy should develop strategies to HURT their shareholders?? What a flimsy, one sided piece of trash article....
You should know that Greenpeace has set its sights on Vermont and they are spending a great deal of time and money lobbying their cause within our boarders. They have taken out numerous full pange adds across the state. Negative growth is not an oxymoron in their dictionaries. This is a full scale campaign blitz and as such I would hope that our media would hold them to full transparency. Blatant endorsment of Greenpeace is the more likely course however.
flat lander

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Oct 12, 2009
 
Vermont is a place to start or pick up speed in your mission because of the massive amount of Idiots that will march for any reason not what they believe in as long as it is against the old school. All their life on someone's dime "aka" college to find a direction [drugs and protest]now have hit the great divide in life and it's time to prove their worth since society is on to useless people they turn to rebellion and anti anything. hey this weekend their is a big rally and the free ride on the bus oh wow I never been there lets go what kind of sign ahh it don't matter pack some granola bars and we will shack up opps use some one pad
Rod Adams

Annapolis, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Oct 12, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Why is it relevant to quote the opinion of former NRC Chairman Ivan Selin regarding economic pressures for nuclear power plants in a competitive market? He last served in that position from July 1991 - June 1995.

Times have changed considerably since then. For example, in the mid 1990s, oil sold for as low as $10 per barrel and natural gas sold for less than $2.00 per million BTU. In contrast, the cost of nuclear fuel is less today than it was in 1995, even without any correction for inflation.

The economic proposition for operating nuclear power plants in a competitive market against low priced fossil fuels was significantly different when Selin was NRC chairman than than it is today.
TNB

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Oct 12, 2009
 
Rod,

Don't confuse the issue with facts and truth!

It will totally discombobulate most in this crowd.

Keep up the great posts!
Vermont Parent

Bangor, ME

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Oct 13, 2009
 
http:www.activistcash.com/orga nization_overview.cfm/oid/131

"Here in the United states,....(Greenpeace) spending about $10 million a year..."
Vermont Parent

Bangor, ME

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Oct 13, 2009
 
Link is broken, the information is from ActivistCash.com

http://www.activistcash.com/organization_over...
Brian

Rustburg, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Oct 13, 2009
 
Not only is quoting the NRC Chairman from a decade and a half ago somewhat questionable, but Greenpeace also relies on the conclusions of "former consulting firm" Authur Andersen to make its case. Authur Andersen is a "former" consulting firm only because it was taken down in the aftermath of the Enron scandal. Its reputation was irrevocably tarnished when it shredded documents related to its audit of Enron and also by the discovery of faulty audits of other companies, such as WorldCom, which also went bankrupt.

Authur Andersen went out of business in 2002, after being convicted of obstruction of justice, so the conclusions quoted here must be almost a decade old or more. How is their opinion relevant today? Is this the best that Greenpeace can do? Have they no shame?
mike mulligan

Roslindale, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Oct 13, 2009
 
We had a little experience with Arthur Anderson in this neck of the woods. I was banging around with the American Tissue paper mill in Winchester NH...they were polluting the Ashuelot River. They couldn’t come with the money to fix it...cause the CEO was siphoning the borrowed monies based on inflated business. Anderson was their bookkeeper...and the feds forced them to turn on America Tissue. The CEO was convicted and is serving about a twenty year sentence....he stole 350 million dollars.
bfterrier

Bellows Falls, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Oct 15, 2009
 
things that make u go hmmmm.
Birdzilla

Yreka, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jan 15, 2010
 
Greenpeace so full of greenpricks they opposing drill in the ANWR they feed us this bunk about the earth being fragile and they claim it will harm the wildlife WHAT A LOAD OF HORSE POO FROM THESE ECO-FREAK TROUBLEMAKER ECO-PRICKS

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 18 of18
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Entergy Discussions

Search the Entergy Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
S&WB taps New Orleans capital projects director... Jan '14 setup 1
Entergy Provides Preliminary Third Quarter Earn... Oct '13 Fukushima Radiation Updat 1
Entergy Corp. (ETR) Updates FY13 Earnings Guidance Oct '13 Fukushima Radiation Updat 1
Entergy Recognized as Worldwide Leader in Clima... Oct '13 Fukushima Radiation Updat 1
Nuclear power plant in Mississippi emits smoke ... (Sep '13) Sep '13 BDV 2
VY still lobbies for new license (Oct '10) Oct '12 Mike Mulligan 134
Troubled Michigan nuclear plant shut down for m... (Apr '12) Apr '12 BDV 1
•••
•••
•••
•••