Freight train traffic to shift in March in wake of rail merger

Full story: Chicago Tribune

More freight trains will be rolling through suburbs lining the Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway starting March 4 now that the line has been acquired by the Canadian National Railway, the Montreal-based railroad ...
Comments
341 - 346 of 346 Comments Last updated Feb 25, 2009
First Prev
of 18
Next Last
beagle

Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#346
Feb 24, 2009
 
I was extremely saddened when I read a news report on Jan 28, 2009 that indicated that the town council of Aurora had decided to disregard the studies/deliberations of their support staff -- the employees and engineering staff of Aurora and contest the STB ruling. The elected officials decided that receiving CN funding for 68% of an overpass on Ogden Avenue was not adequate.
They wanted more.

No doubt Aurora's politicians thought there would be no downside for their contesting the STB ruling. They were wrong. They do not have an mitigation agreement with CN. They are merely the benificary of a ruling by the STB. Since they chose to dispute the ruling their "bounty" is not protected.

What becomes exceedingly disturbing is the political "slant" that the politicians have continually assigned to any documentation. Obviously, they hope that none of their constiutents actually read the originals. As an example the information in the press story below completely misrepresents the information from the ICC filing to the STB.

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews...

http://www.stb.dot.gov/filings/all.nsf/ba7f93...

beagle
Bill-Elgin

Elgin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#347
Feb 24, 2009
 
JBChitown wrote:
<quoted text>
.... CN needs to abide by the mitigation measures placed on them by the STB...
That's like saying BARRINGTON needs to abide by the STB decision. Barrington can object, as can CN. In fact they BOTH are doing so. We understand why CN is objecting.
My GGGeneration

Bensenville, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#348
Feb 24, 2009
 
JBChitown wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...there you go. Way to use the stimulus funds, to the benefit of CN Rail! Are you f'n kidding me?? CN needs to abide by the mitigation measures placed on them by the STB AND I will continue to contend that the STB was short sighted in it's review and there should be MORE mitigations placed on CN. Hunter..KEEP YOUR HANDS OUT OF MY POCKET!!
Well let's see.... there's over $2 billion in there for groups like ACORN. That would build a couple nice bridges I'd guess. Feel better now?

http://74.125.95.132/search?q= cache:n9OSWE_BMQcJ:james4ameri ca.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/th e-full-stimuls-package-pork-an d-all-acorn-is-back-in/+stimul us+package+pork&hl=en& ct=clnk&cd=8&gl=us
PMD

Jacksonville, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#349
Feb 24, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

Not a Railroader wrote:
<quoted text>
Your point is excellent. I didn't want to get too technical in my post. For whatever reason the opponents of this deal seem to think that double track and/or long passing sidings will mean that the trains will block the crossings for longer time periods. From what I know the opposite is generally true.
As to the use of high speed turnouts I would be shocked if CN did not install them on all of their passing sidings, crossovers and interconnections. It would make sense because they don't want to see their trains sitting idle, the reason that they bought the EJ&E in the first place was to get their trains moving. The only place I would think they would not use high speed/powered turnouts is on industrial sidings/leads. You might enlighten me if there is a benefit to using them on those as well.
NaR and JRR got it right
Sometimes people see a side track parralel to a main line and incorrectly think it a double main line. Installing track like this does not necessarily mean more traffic; they are designed to make existing traffic more efficient. The high speed turnouts are installed on main line track, not industry sidings. The turnouts allow the road trains to get out of each others way more efficiently. Sidings parralel to single main lines allow trains to move along the single line sections in both directions, leap frog fashion. Road crossing delays are reduced because trains do not spend as much time speeding up and slowing down to change tracks, moving into and out of the side tracks.
Alt

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#350
Feb 25, 2009
 
JRR wrote:
<quoted text>They're not building a new LINE, they're building a new TRACK ... on property they already own.
Sadly, you have nothing of substance to say or you wouldn't resort to accusing people of being corporate brown-nosers.
As I've said numerous times, I have no financial relationship with CN. I simply want to see an existing railroad property used to its fullest and want to see the most efficient transportation system possible. Caving in to parochial interests who loathe the idea of daring to use a railroad line to run trains is not the way to look out for the best interests of all.
You mean the best interests of CN not the best interests of all. Your disdain for opponents of the deal and obsessive support of CN suggests that you have more than a passing interest in this deal. What exactly is your interest in CN ? The explanation you gave is hogwash

“More human than human.”

Since: Jan 09

North Suburbs of Chicago

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#351
Feb 25, 2009
 
Alt wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean the best interests of CN not the best interests of all. Your disdain for opponents of the deal and obsessive support of CN suggests that you have more than a passing interest in this deal. What exactly is your interest in CN ? The explanation you gave is hogwash
I would say efficient use of railroads is in the interest of just about everyone. I understand no one wants increased rail traffic near them, but it has to go somewhere.
FYI, Last time I checked I have no financial stake in CN, but many own in (CNI) in their penison plans. Also, I live about 400 yards from CN's line.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 18
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Canadian National Railway Discussions

Search the Canadian National Railway Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Former Toronto York and Front Street CN Offices. Jun '14 Casey Jones 1
E. Hunter Harrison Earns $29,281 PER DAY !!! (C... (Feb '07) Jun '14 Irene 154
Several major projects resume, planned for Sout... May '14 Mary Hirsch 1
Canadian native groups cancel CN Rail blockade (Jun '06) Apr '14 Rusty Dyck 872
conductor wannabe (Apr '13) Apr '14 Bob Johnson 3
CN provides confidential dangerous goods data t... Mar '14 carolann 2
Let's hear from CN Employees (Mar '09) Mar '14 Jim 14
•••
•••