Mom Speaks Out After 15-Year-Old Son'...

Mom Speaks Out After 15-Year-Old Son's Fatal Shooting

There are 237 comments on the NBC4i.com story from Jan 18, 2013, titled Mom Speaks Out After 15-Year-Old Son's Fatal Shooting. In it, NBC4i.com reports that:

A Columbus mother is speaking out against guns and violence just one day after her 15-year-old son was shot and killed.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NBC4i.com.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#193 Jan 23, 2013
Murphys law wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a lawyer, he is defending them in court
Che prefers payment-in-kind.
Murphys law

Wakeman, OH

#194 Jan 23, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Che prefers payment-in-kind.
A prominent politician in Ohio was into cocaine in the 80s, perhaps he still is...
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#195 Jan 23, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Che, I've been dealing with Reader for three years. Same old BS, and she is well aware of my stand on the issues.
When you learn how things work between longtime posters in Columbus, maybe your light bulb will illuminate.
The fact that you associate with crackheads comes as no surprise. Are you a buyer or a seller?
Hear Ye, Hear Ye, Hear Ye'all.

His royal Highness, the Prince of pablum, King of Columbus topix hath spoken.

All Ye Northeastern Ohio scum are hereby on notice of double secret probation status being immediately imposed.

woof

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#196 Jan 23, 2013
Murphys law wrote:
<quoted text>
A prominent politician in Ohio was into cocaine in the 80s, perhaps he still is...
It goes along with his wife beating. Apparently leftists have no problem with that.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#197 Jan 23, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You make your points perfectly clear to yourself and other teabaggers. When pressed, you can't defend anything you say. I've seen crackheads do a better job of sticking to a story than you do.
People seem to better understand those of their own kind.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#198 Jan 23, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>It's called not playing your childish games, Reader. You, like Che, weasel around and try to bait people into a "gotcha" post. I've made my position perfectly clear to those with the ability to think without the fog of leftist hate obscuring their faculties.
Try somewhere else.
Funny--it looks to me like being unwilling to accept personal responsibility for your views.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#199 Jan 23, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny--it looks to me like being unwilling to accept personal responsibility for your views.
I've done it here for three years, and you're well aware of it.
We're sick of your games that you tend to play when you think you've found a kindred spirit or two.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#200 Jan 23, 2013
Murphys law wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a lawyer, he is defending them in court
You like the Constitution, don't you?

woof

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#201 Jan 23, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I've done it here for three years, and you're well aware of it.
We're sick of your games that you tend to play when you think you've found a kindred spirit or two.
Well, George, there's always the hope that you'll grow up.

You make some pretty bold statements about blacks and then claim that you harbor no biases--that you are simply dealing in the facts.

The reality is that you go far beyond the facts to reach conclusions NOT supported.

And when someone comes close to catching you with your hand in the cookie jar you start calling names, or claim to the be the victim of Catholic-bashing or hatred against your white manhood.

Yes--you have been consistent for three years.

But consistency doesn't make your right, or your beliefs any more just, sensible or attractive.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#202 Jan 23, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, George, there's always the hope that you'll grow up.
You make some pretty bold statements about blacks and then claim that you harbor no biases--that you are simply dealing in the facts.
The reality is that you go far beyond the facts to reach conclusions NOT supported.
And when someone comes close to catching you with your hand in the cookie jar you start calling names, or claim to the be the victim of Catholic-bashing or hatred against your white manhood.
Yes--you have been consistent for three years.
But consistency doesn't make your right, or your beliefs any more just, sensible or attractive.
52%
72%
Tell me how those stats from your beloved federal government aren't linked to supportable conclusions.
Murphys law

Wellington, OH

#203 Jan 23, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, George, there's always the hope that you'll grow up.
You make some pretty bold statements about blacks and then claim that you harbor no biases--that you are simply dealing in the facts.
The reality is that you go far beyond the facts to reach conclusions NOT supported.
And when someone comes close to catching you with your hand in the cookie jar you start calling names, or claim to the be the victim of Catholic-bashing or hatred against your white manhood.
Yes--you have been consistent for three years.
But consistency doesn't make your right, or your beliefs any more just, sensible or attractive.
You can't make an argument without calling us racist.

And you still can't dig up evidence from either of us where we have accused there of being a genetic superiority of whites or inferiority of blacks.

"White privilege" and "Institutional Racism" are your bread and butter, and all the excuses for minorities to blame whitey and the eeevil Republicans for their struggles.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#204 Jan 23, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
52%
72%
Tell me how those stats from your beloved federal government aren't linked to supportable conclusions.
Somebody please tell him because he obviously can't do it himself.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#205 Jan 23, 2013
Murphys law wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't make an argument without calling us racist.
And you still can't dig up evidence from either of us where we have accused there of being a genetic superiority of whites or inferiority of blacks.
"White privilege" and "Institutional Racism" are your bread and butter, and all the excuses for minorities to blame whitey and the eeevil Republicans for their struggles.
Remember...Reader campaigned for Jesse Jackson and voted for Barack Obama twice.
"'nuff said," as she likes to say.
Enzyte Bob

Columbus, OH

#206 Jan 23, 2013
He was turning his life around.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#207 Jan 24, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Semi-automatics are a part of a larger problem--particularly relate to mass killings.
Easy access to guns of all kinds (the sort of thing that universal background checks and weapon-tracing are likely to combat) cannot solve all of the issues leading to this, or a good many other deaths of young black men and kids.
But, it the guns were not there, perhaps they would, as George recently suggested, live to fight another day.
politics aside

have you ever heard of the Spartans?

300 Greeks held off over 1 million Persians; and killed an estimated 100,000 in 3 days.

Swords and bows.

If you do the math, that is 100 kills per Spartan per day. The true number is those alive on day 3 had much higher ratio.

my point being, killing has never been a problem.

limiting magazine capacity will limit crime about as much as the drinking age keeps under age from drinking.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#208 Jan 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
52%
72%
Tell me how those stats from your beloved federal government aren't linked to supportable conclusions.
There are numerous possible conclusions.

The question that you refuse to answer is what are YOUR conclusions?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#209 Jan 24, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
There are numerous possible conclusions.
The question that you refuse to answer is what are YOUR conclusions?
The three "Bs." Blacks Behaving Badly.
But you'll say it's all whitey's fault.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#210 Jan 24, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>The three "Bs." Blacks Behaving Badly.
But you'll say it's all whitey's fault.
Didn't you call somebody racist on another thread for those kind of statements?

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#211 Jan 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't you call somebody racist on another thread for those kind of statements?
Bad Black Behavior is a fact. The statistics don't lie.
Facts can't be racist.
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

#212 Jan 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't you call somebody racist on another thread for those kind of statements?
George is the king of projecting, including projection of projecting.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pull your pants up. 2 min Pam 17
Muslims beat woman for wearing bikini French ou... 5 min Pam 38
News Dive team wants to raise dam in effort to find ... 11 min jesse 7
ayfkm? 1 hr cowboy heroes 1
Review: CARPET KING FLOOR COVERINGS (Dec '11) 3 hr Corperate 3
Poll Panty hose vs bare skin What is your preference? 4 hr Seriouslady 149
For Cat Lovers Only! 4 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 178
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages