Fatboy Gets Seat of Honor Next to Mic...
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#21 Feb 25, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Except you wouldn't have had a restored PRC, at least not then. You would have had a decade of Chinese civil war that might have gotten very ugly if a nervous Japan, Taiwan and ROK were affected.
I was guessing that as in the rest of the Eastern Bloc, once the military turned on the leaders regarding firing on the crowds, that there would be a transition of power to an elected government from the Taiwan leaders.

Though considering Chinese history, civil war could have been the result.
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#22 Feb 25, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
Where have you been, Roberto? I agree with you on the latter. I don't understand why 'getting' bin laden was a big deal. It has not weakened the terrorists, emboldened them if anything.
I'll tell you what, under Bush 1 or II, Benghazi would have had far faster reaction and farther reaching consequences. And Connie Rice would not have run off to Peru for a month after. I think they were both transparent as possible.
And if Clinton had reacted to the Cole and embassy bomings and deaths, 9-11-01 may not have happened.
Hey, SL.

I don't mind going after Bin Laden and Al Queda so much for one simple reason: Ever hear the saying you can't fight City Hall? No private organization can match forces with any government just because of the expense involved. If nothing else, Al Queda is going through the same thing by fighting our military.

Iraq, however, was a major blunder and it had nothing to do with Bin Laden or Al Queda. They thought they could bring "Democracy" to 5,000 year old civilizations when they can't even bring it to Greece. Blinded again by their Zionist love for Israel.

All the Arabs told 43 he was a fool and that Iran was the problem, not Iraq.

Major, major blunder.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#23 Feb 25, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
"I was for it before I was against it"
"The fundamentals of the economy are strong"
"47%"
You can count Candy Crowley's intrusion into the debate as another.
Every campaign since '76 has had a defining moment.

There was also, "There you go again," and "Are you better off than you were four years ago?"
Enzyte Bob

Blacklick, OH

#24 Feb 25, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I would have been willing to take that chance.
Maybe 41 would have gotten a second term, but no Republican Congress of 1994 and no balanced budget. That has really been one of the few political bright spots since we became adults.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
August 21 - When it All Hits the Fan 9 min 404 not found 3
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 10 min Mojo Risen 1,249
breaking: antifa members protesting soros deman... 1 hr Mud, James Mud 2
News Fair tragedy: Victim enlisted in Marines 1 hr Stevie Wonder 41
News 2 Columbus council members endorse Nan Whaley f... 8 hr Duke for Mayor 1
Party In Crisis–Anti Trump Approach/Identity Po... 12 hr Duke for Mayor 6
Democratic voter base declines 12 hr Duke for Mayor 2
Why Ask about Obama? America has Only One Presi... 16 hr ImPeach 156

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages