“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#42 Feb 12, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I seem to remember Tippy and his brothers and sisters in arms singing loudly "What's love got to do with it?" when opposing gay marriage.
Now "loving couples" are trotted out as the gilded prerequisite for raising well adjusted children.
woof
Since homosexual couples cannot naturally reproduce, the question is, "What's biology got to do with it?"

And Darwin says, "Everything."

Biology 101 --

Children are the product of a father [male] and a mother [female].
Every single time.

And the most ideal child-rearing occurs when that child is reared in a home with both parents present.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#43 Feb 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the difference to the kid?
How lucky for the progressive cause that you don't think.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#44 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
And you are missing out on the plain fact that the children of these avowed non-committed individuals will never see themselves as a product of, or witness the model of, a mother and father committed to each other and to their children for the benefit of the family unit, willing to sacrifice and celebrate, as a team, through thick and thin.
Instead, what these children will realize is that they are the product of two virtual strangers who once contracted with each other solely for the purpose of creating that child for their very separate and very individual purposes.
For a married couple to divorce and relegate their child to a once-weekly visit with Dad is sad enough. For two virtual strangers to intentionally create a child relegated to such a life from birth is reprehensible.
Be that as it may, I would suggest that this is an incredibly small subgroup of folks. And furthermore, I would suggest that those few kids are likely, on balance, to do as well as most of the rest.

Couple decades back when I adopted there were still folks in positions of authority swearing that single people shouldn't even be allowed to parent kids who weren't necessarily going to ever see the inside of Ozzie and Harriet's world, let alone the proverbial "healthy white infants" that always seem to be in short supply. If a forty-something woman wants to take her chances with the sperm of a gay guy to make a baby, and thence a family, I'm not going to invest energy into getting everyone whipped up to go tell the king that the sky is falling.

If you are going to get into a lather about kids growing up in bad situations, why don't you concern yourself more with poverty, public education, lack of quality child care and the environment?

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#45 Feb 12, 2013
Kemosahbe wrote:
<quoted text>
It's metaphor, Einstein, not euphemism.
It was silly of me to expect a filthy conservative to know the difference.
Carry on in your hateful delusions.
OMG. I used the wrong word.
Hi-Ho, Silver...and away with you.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#46 Feb 12, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
Of course, Pat Robertson has all the answers:
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/roberts...
You're Pat Robertson's fan? Who knew?
I wasn't sure he was still alive.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#47 Feb 12, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
in abortion....life or death
all your other talk has no meaning
Oh, oh.

RS is using is alcohol points early this week.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#48 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
How lucky for the progressive cause that you don't think.
That's not an answer to the question.

If a kid is 2 years old and lives with a single parent as a result of two unmarried adults having a child or lives with a single parent as a result of a divorce, what difference does it make to the kid?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#49 Feb 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not an answer to the question.
If a kid is 2 years old and lives with a single parent as a result of two unmarried adults having a child or lives with a single parent as a result of a divorce, what difference does it make to the kid?
Not to mention, they are no longer likely to be strangers.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#50 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You're Pat Robertson's fan? Who knew?
I wasn't sure he was still alive.
Seems to be.

At least, I thought I saw his lips moving.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#51 Feb 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not an answer to the question.
If a kid is 2 years old and lives with a single parent as a result of two unmarried adults having a child or lives with a single parent as a result of a divorce, what difference does it make to the kid?
Neither case is ideal for the child, as we recognize as a society.

But specifically, in these cases, the two unmarried individuals are strangers who contracted with each other for the sole intent of bringing a child into existence to be jockeyed back and forth between their separate worlds -- one heterosexual, the other homosexual. Pure chaos.

And progressives laud these actions as commendable.

Meanwhile, in the very next breath, they...[see Reader's post, above] have the gall to suggest that conservatives can stem the trend of single-parenthood by tackling "poverty, public education, lack of quality child care and the environment."

And absolutely none of those issues has anything to do with the heart of this issue: MORALITY.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#52 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither case is ideal for the child, as we recognize as a society.
But specifically, in these cases, the two unmarried individuals are strangers who contracted with each other for the sole intent of bringing a child into existence to be jockeyed back and forth between their separate worlds -- one heterosexual, the other homosexual. Pure chaos.
And progressives laud these actions as commendable.
Meanwhile, in the very next breath, they...[see Reader's post, above] have the gall to suggest that conservatives can stem the trend of single-parenthood by tackling "poverty, public education, lack of quality child care and the environment."
And absolutely none of those issues has anything to do with the heart of this issue: MORALITY.
Once they enter into such an arrangement and share the rearing of a child, they are hardly strangers.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#53 Feb 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Once they enter into such an arrangement and share the rearing of a child, they are hardly strangers.
You have such high standards for parenting and family.
Good for you.

/s
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#54 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You have such high standards for parenting and family.
Good for you.
/s
Is that your way of agreeing that they aren't strangers?

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#55 Feb 12, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that your way of agreeing that they aren't strangers?
Not at all.
It's your way of demonstrating what a loon you are.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#56 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Since homosexual couples cannot naturally reproduce, the question is, "What's biology got to do with it?"
And Darwin says, "Everything."
Biology 101 --
Children are the product of a father [male] and a mother [female].
Every single time.
And the most ideal child-rearing occurs when that child is reared in a home with both parents present.
Biology has everything to do with reproduction and absolutely nothing to do with parenting.

If you don't believe me, walk into any Juvenile Court, find a Magistrate or Judge, and ask them.

Just so we're clear on that.

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#57 Feb 12, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Biology has everything to do with reproduction and absolutely nothing to do with parenting.
If you don't believe me, walk into any Juvenile Court, find a Magistrate or Judge, and ask them.
Just so we're clear on that.
woof
However, since homosexuals are confused about their own biology, they are automatically poor parenting candidates.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#58 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
However, since homosexuals are confused about their own biology, they are automatically poor parenting candidates.
once again...consult your local juvenile court, where there are lots of trained professionals who are much more qualified and experienced than you in that subject matter.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#59 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all.
It's your way of demonstrating what a loon you are.
I'm a loon for suggesting that two people who raise a child together cease to be strangers upon setting out on that venture?

“Hi-Yo Silver! Away!”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#60 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
OMG. I used the wrong word.
Hi-Ho, Silver...and away with you.
You first.

BTW, shyt-for-brains, infertile straight couples also cannot reproduce naturally.

Please revisit my comment about pickups and sedans.

Hater.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#61 Feb 12, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
However, since homosexuals are confused about their own biology, they are automatically poor parenting candidates.
tip--when it comes to biology, and physiology, I think you are the one who may be confused, or at least ignorant.

Modern research has determined distinct brain patterns in people who are gay, as well as patterns of response to sexual stimulii.

And the most important sexual organ has always been the brain.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Anti islam protesters in TEXAS 21 min Pope Che Reagan C... 46
Could Columbus schools data scandal sink mayora... 25 min They cannot kill ... 1
Spook....fox report 52 min They cannot kill ... 31
Fugitive treasure hunter nabbed in Florida afte... 3 hr They cannot kill ... 3
Update: dangerous Muslim travels 5 hr Duke for Mayor 61
Review: Moroccan Steam Spa 5 hr Big Johnson 14
Gang leader reportedly dead in officer-involved... 5 hr proud american 3
homosexuality is a "lifestyle choice" 9 hr They cannot kill ... 191
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 10 hr Reality Speaks 5,585
Columbus Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:43 am PST

NFL 8:43AM
Jimmy Haslam: Browns have to get a QB in 2015
Bleacher Report 9:17 AM
Jimmy Haslam Speaks on Browns' 2015 QB Situation
Bleacher Report12:23 PM
Manziel's Teammates Discuss QB's Rookie Season
Yahoo! Sports12:24 PM
Report: Cleveland Browns 'wrecked' by Johnny Manziel's rookie season
NBC Sports12:46 PM
Teammate: Manziel was a "100 percent joke" as a rookie