Modern Family...Progressive-Style

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#570 Feb 28, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I understood long ago that your ilk is to stupid to feed themselves.
To figure simple math word problems is way over your head.
Your predecessors evolved into thinking beings......did you miss the meeting?
You keep laughing, as I prepare to run and hide in paradise from your ilk.
I am almost 32. I only have 15 to 20 years.
you can go soak your head, I am going to have fun; and you aren't invited even naked.
sucks to be you.
Almost 32 and four kids in college.

My, my, my.
Duke for Mayor

United States

#571 Feb 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
I wanna hear how to spend $4000 to make $8000!
Give me $4000.00 and I'll tell you.

woof

“Hi-Yo Silver! Away!”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#572 Feb 28, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
I understood long ago that your ilk is to stupid to feed themselves.
To figure simple math word problems is way over your head.
Your predecessors evolved into thinking beings......did you miss the meeting?
You keep laughing, as I prepare to run and hide in paradise from your ilk.
I am almost 32. I only have 15 to 20 years.
you can go soak your head, I am going to have fun; and you aren't invited even naked.
sucks to be you.
Do us all a favor and just stay there.

“Hi-Yo Silver! Away!”

Since: Aug 12

Location hidden

#573 Feb 28, 2013
6was9 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you don't as you have nothing and because you were wrong and a lying coward sack of liberal progressive shyte.....
As you know, you would not need a link because the story would have been national news.......
Still waiting for your apology......
go vikings....
From someone who admits not having watched the show in many years.

You got the only apology I'm giving. Maybe you missed it, the reading comprehension of conservatives is quite appalling.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#574 Feb 28, 2013
Kemosahbe wrote:
<quoted text>
From someone who admits not having watched the show in many years.
You got the only apology I'm giving. Maybe you missed it, the reading comprehension of conservatives is quite appalling.
Again MM, Sterling, Author...etc. If SNL had a skit re allah or the pedophile prophet mohammed....it would have been national news and you would have no problem documenting it.....
The South Park episode attempt was censored and was all over the news.......
No need to watch the BS SNL show to hear about it......

You were wrong and you lied......again you are wrong!!!!!!

I am waiting for your apology aysewype........

Re your comment on conservatives....LMFAO.......A pparently it is you who can not read or at least comprehend......

go vikings.....

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#575 Mar 1, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Almost 32 and four kids in college.
My, my, my.
Probably a typo. He claimed to be 52 an hour earlier.

Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
Daddy died 8 years ago of pancreatic cancer.
My Mommy is still very alive an kicking in the Villages down in Florida through 4/10.
Till Mommy dies, she does a great job of spending Daddy's money. She gives more to the church each year than you earn in 2. I know that because my wife is a social worker at a hospital with 25 years; and a Masters. So I doubled her salary for your comparison.
My guess is Mommy outlives me. 20 years older than I.
Daddy had a Harvard Masters in Business Management. Daddy started college when I was 2.
My Daddy worked for a Corporation for 45 years; and me 4.
Self employment is the ticket. When my Daddy retired he did my books for me for 3 years. Also floated quite a few loans. I bought my Daddy a Surburban for his birthday as payment for CFO function. He drove it 6 months and shriveled up to death.
I sold business; and took Corporate job.
Someday I will inherit Daddy's money, my sister too.
When you add what I earned to that, my kids future is quite less worrisome. Their college is already paid; and 2 of 4 gainfully employed. No grandchildren yet thank God.
I will be 52 in July. I make 3-5 new sales calls a week; and keep current customers business seamless.
my sales to date for 2013 are $1,863,879.00 rounded. 60 days worth. Was down 2.45% from last year with 2 new large clients. Not good. The orders shipping in March have picked up; and semi loads every single day already scheduled out.
can you figure 3.75% commissions? add the 8% price increase to above sales; and understand my importance in seamless implementation. Do the math. More than you earn. a month.
above is generated by one person....me...those sales are sold for commissions that keep over 1 hundred union employees in Cincinnati working.
2 girls in my office; and a graphics designer handle orders, books, phones. Costs are split between me and manufacturer. Their people, my office.
above business had LLC granted in March 2012, founded in 8/2010.
so since you vomited your stupidity again.
how does it feel to know a guy walked out of a 21 year marriage leaving everything including clothing behind, got fired from the corporate job just 4 years ago; and is re-married with a new business from scratch providing 35K a month commission stream?
ZERO debt.
all I have to do is gain CEO trust; and solve their problems. Entertaining while building relationships is what I do best. Technical stuff is for Engineers; and I prefer to Chauffeur them regularly. Cross calling also an expertise of mine.
Monday I closed a contract for $200,000 a month new shipments starting 4/1. My goal is 3 that size in 2013.
if I am such a failure.....how did I out of thin air create a position that paid in the first year, more than you earn in 9 years all benefits included?
and in May I have 9 fishing trips with clients lined up. 2 in April with diehards since you brought up the boat for the 1000th time.
I guess you liberals have re-defined everything, because comparing yourself to me should embarrass the heck out of you.
and guess what hoddie rat....I care less if you believe it or not.
if you wax the boat I will pay you $150, you provide the supplies. Must be completed prior to 3/30.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#576 Mar 1, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Give me $4000.00 and I'll tell you.
woof
you are always asking for handouts.

if you won the power ball jackpot, you would be bankrupt again in 3 years.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#577 Mar 1, 2013
Kemosahbe wrote:
<quoted text>
Do us all a favor and just stay there.
only favor I would do for you, is throw dirt on you so the coyotes don't poison themselves snacking on your corpse.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#578 Mar 1, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Just yesterday you said the world was going to end Saturday. Now it's tonight?
If the world ends tonight, how will all of this stuff you predicted happen tomorrow?
Wrong again, Walter. The world apparantly didn't end and there are no marauding throngs in the streets. What's your next prediction?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#579 Mar 1, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
have you not been listening to our President?
I quoted him.
Tyically, when one quotes another in written word, one surrounds the quoted words with punctuation called "quotation marks." They look like this "". At the least, when quoting someone, the author should attribute the words to the quoted indvidual. Usually, it's something like this (using your example): According to President Obama, the world will end tonight.

You didn't do either of those things. That leaves the conclusion that your world ending prophecy was yet another stupid thing you said that you are trying to pass off onto someone else.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#580 Mar 1, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Tyically, when one quotes another in written word, one surrounds the quoted words with punctuation called "quotation marks." They look like this "". At the least, when quoting someone, the author should attribute the words to the quoted indvidual. Usually, it's something like this (using your example): According to President Obama, the world will end tonight.
You didn't do either of those things. That leaves the conclusion that your world ending prophecy was yet another stupid thing you said that you are trying to pass off onto someone else.
what ever you say

your failed God Obama has been for 2 weeks traveling the country with his doom speech of the world ending today.

he lied like always.

you spin and lie as cover.

it is a scream to watch; and is only going to get better.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#581 Mar 1, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
what ever you say
your failed God Obama has been for 2 weeks traveling the country with his doom speech of the world ending today.
he lied like always.
you spin and lie as cover.
it is a scream to watch; and is only going to get better.
I would like to read the quote from Obama stating that the world was going to end today. I will wait for that right after your link supporting your 9000 gun law claim. And your Texas division claim, and your.....
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#582 Mar 1, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I would like to read the quote from Obama stating that the world was going to end today. I will wait for that right after your link supporting your 9000 gun law claim. And your Texas division claim, and your.....
hold your breath too

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#583 Mar 1, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
what ever you say
your failed God Obama has been for 2 weeks traveling the country with his doom speech of the world ending today.
he lied like always.
you spin and lie as cover.
it is a scream to watch; and is only going to get better.
I haven't heard Obama say that the world is going to end.

There are, however, some real elements contained in the sequester that people need to know about.

Recall that the point of the sequester [regardless of who you believe came up with the idea (Boehner)] was to set in place a default so undesireable that Congress would gain the motivation that they seem to have been lacking to tackle more sensible solutions.

Some folks are just slow learners.

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#584 Mar 1, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
I haven't heard Obama say that the world is going to end.
There are, however, some real elements contained in the sequester that people need to know about.
Recall that the point of the sequester [regardless of who you believe came up with the idea (Boehner)] was to set in place a default so undesireable that Congress would gain the motivation that they seem to have been lacking to tackle more sensible solutions.
Some folks are just slow learners.
Your lies know no bounds:

Whose sequester?

To determine the question of ownership, we turned to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics.

Woodward’s reporting shows clearly that defense sequestration was an idea that came out of Obama’s White House. But the intention was to force Republicans to negotiate, not to actually put the cuts into effect.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#585 Mar 1, 2013
First and foremost, the voters have seen President Obama at his very worst. The Post editorial board observes,“Washington has reached a strange place indeed when the opposition party offers the president more control over spending — and he refuses it.” If the GOP is on the ball they will remind voters of this day in and day out. If nothing else, it may dissuade the White House from finding “horror” stories. For each one the Republicans’ reply is simply,“President Obama chose to inflict this pain.”

In fact Obama enacted a gag order preventing Cabinet heads from discussing it until the scare-the-living-daylights-out -of-the-rube operation began.

The take away for many voters might be that their political leaders are dishonest and that the only way to get these people to focus on fiscal restraint is shock therapy akin to the sequester. You can understand then why the White House has been hysterical for a couple weeks. Sequestration is a nightmare, but mostly for the liberal proponents of an ever-increasing welfare state. As Glenn Kessler puts it,“The administration may rue the day that it issued so many scary statistics with such specificity. If sequestration remains in effect for the rest of the fiscal year, reporters will certainly attempt to check whether the administration’s predictions came close to reality.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-tur...

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#586 Mar 1, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Your lies know no bounds:
Whose sequester?
To determine the question of ownership, we turned to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics.
Woodward’s reporting shows clearly that defense sequestration was an idea that came out of Obama’s White House. But the intention was to force Republicans to negotiate, not to actually put the cuts into effect.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
But then there's this:

The latest semantic spin is to call the looming $1.2 trillion in cuts, which could throw the whole economy back into recession,“Obama’s Sequester.” House Speaker John Boehner indulged this approach half a dozen times in a floor speech before he went on break, establishing its place in the talking-points firmament.

There are a couple problems with this tactic, as my colleague Michael Tomasky pointed out Tuesday. Congress passed sequestration before the president signed it, and the whole self-defeating exercise was carried out in response to Tea Party Republicans’ insistence that we play chicken with the debt ceiling, which ultimately cost America its AAA credit rating.

But here’s the thing. I happened to come across an old email that throws cold water on House Republicans’ attempts to call this “Obama’s Sequester.”

It’s a PowerPoint presentation that Boehner’s office developed with the Republican Policy Committee and sent out to the Capitol Hill GOP on July 31, 2011. Intended to explain the outline of the proposed debt deal, the presentation is titled:“Two Step Approach to Hold President Obama Accountable.”

It’s essentially an internal sales document from the old dealmaker Boehner to his unruly and often unreasonable Tea Party cohort. But it’s clear as day in the presentation that “sequestration” was considered a cudgel to guarantee a reduction in federal spending—the conservatives’ necessary condition for not having America default on its obligations.

The presentation lays out the deal in clear terms, describing the spending backstop as “automatic across-the-board cuts (‘sequestration’). Same mechanism used in 1997 Balanced Budget Agreement.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...

Hugh Victor Thompson III

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#587 Mar 1, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
But then there's this:
The latest semantic spin is to call the looming $1.2 trillion in cuts, which could throw the whole economy back into recession,“Obama’s Sequester.” House Speaker John Boehner indulged this approach half a dozen times in a floor speech before he went on break, establishing its place in the talking-points firmament.
There are a couple problems with this tactic, as my colleague Michael Tomasky pointed out Tuesday. Congress passed sequestration before the president signed it, and the whole self-defeating exercise was carried out in response to Tea Party Republicans’ insistence that we play chicken with the debt ceiling, which ultimately cost America its AAA credit rating.
But here’s the thing. I happened to come across an old email that throws cold water on House Republicans’ attempts to call this “Obama’s Sequester.”
It’s a PowerPoint presentation that Boehner’s office developed with the Republican Policy Committee and sent out to the Capitol Hill GOP on July 31, 2011. Intended to explain the outline of the proposed debt deal, the presentation is titled:“Two Step Approach to Hold President Obama Accountable.”
It’s essentially an internal sales document from the old dealmaker Boehner to his unruly and often unreasonable Tea Party cohort. But it’s clear as day in the presentation that “sequestration” was considered a cudgel to guarantee a reduction in federal spending—the conservatives’ necessary condition for not having America default on its obligations.
The presentation lays out the deal in clear terms, describing the spending backstop as “automatic across-the-board cuts (‘sequestration’). Same mechanism used in 1997 Balanced Budget Agreement.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...
Sorry, but PolitiFact trumps the failed rag formerly known as Newsweek every day of the week.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#588 Mar 1, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Your lies know no bounds:
Whose sequester?
To determine the question of ownership, we turned to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics.
Woodward’s reporting shows clearly that defense sequestration was an idea that came out of Obama’s White House. But the intention was to force Republicans to negotiate, not to actually put the cuts into effect.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
Whaddya know. Woodward does have a new book he's trying to sell.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#589 Mar 1, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Your lies know no bounds:
Whose sequester?
To determine the question of ownership, we turned to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics.
Woodward’s reporting shows clearly that defense sequestration was an idea that came out of Obama’s White House. But the intention was to force Republicans to negotiate, not to actually put the cuts into effect.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...
What is it with you and every thing being a lie? Can't someone rely on a different source or different perspective without it being a lie? You are pretty obsessive when it comes to that accusation.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ohio bans sex with animals; violators could fac... 1 hr Nick Monaco 5
News Trump order has Ohioa s undocumented immigrants... 1 hr TAAM 10
Girls what your dirtiest fantasy? 1 hr Protest the Patri... 14
Coal States- keep that deadly Fuel out of Ohio 2 hr Ted 1
Middle Class will now be paying for the wall. 2 hr 404 not found 4
Can We Get a Refund onTrump ? 3 hr Hail Hydra 7
Trump and Pence losing popularity 3 hr Thunder Paws 43
Worlds fastest growing religion is..... 5 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 246
Donald Trump Administration 6 hr White Fangs 795
Odds of Trump's impeachment 14 hr Reality 330

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages